The newer image of god, Jesus, clearly states that if you believe in him you are just swell, looked after, but if you dare disbelieve in Him you will suffer the old timey wrath of god.
Well, it seems to have been «not so muc... a supernatural external miracle but... the dawning internal realization that this life of Jesus reflected
a new image of God, an image that defied the conventional wisdom, an image that called into question the exalted king as the primary analogy by which God could be understood.»
Not exact matches
Rather, the theological and scientific advisers to the section included a Canadian member
of parliament, who is also a United Church minister, quoting William Stringfellow, Rachel Carson, and John Cobb; a theologian from Hong Kong who called for rejecting the «commander»
image in Genesis
of God giving shape and order to what he has made, in favor
of the (female) «brooding spirit»
image «which best addresses our current crisis»; and Larry Rasmussen
of New York's Union Seminary, who linked the work
of the Spirit with the growing environmental movement.
What has changed is that we are no longer the
gods of the Victorian
image, omniscient and decreeing; but in the
new theological
image, with freedom our first principle, not authority....
God's promised fulfillment includes, among other things, the
image of a
New Jerusalem where «death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning nor crying nor pain any more, for the former things have passed away» (Rev. 21:4) As we begin to engage in the business
of genetic co-creation, how can we be sure that our path goes toward this fulfillment rather than toward some irreversible destruction?
Of course, the great
new dispensation will occur in that fabulous place
imaged in the spiritual songs as «heaven» where
God reigns supremely and with justice.
What is created at that moment is a single
new creature — a human person — with the capacity to become conscious and free «in the
image and likeness
of God».
And it is a dismissive, hurtful way to speak about women, who Piper seems to have forgotten were also created in the
image of God, were appointed by
God as leaders at critical times in the history
of Israel and the Church, and were the first to whom Jesus appeared when he inaugurated his
new Kingdom on Resurrection Day.
Its imagistic character means it stands as a corrective to the bias
of much constructive theology toward conceptual clarity, often at the price
of imagistic richness.11 Although it would be insufficient to rest in
new images and to refuse to spell out conceptually their implications in as comprehensive a way as possible, the more critical task is to propose what Dennis Nineham calls a «lively imaginative picture»
of the way
God and the world as we know it are related (Nineham, 201 - 2).
Other interpreters looked to verses in the
New Testament presenting Christ as the «
image of the invisible
God» (Col. 1:15).
But when we miss out on trying
new things and taking risks, we're missing out on what it looks like to live fully alive as humans made in the
image of God.
There is no possibility
of understanding history as the
image of God unless we reach a
new theological understanding
of both imagery and the imagination.
It is a
New Testament theme which Miss Krook here rightly articulates, the love
of man and woman is an
image of the love
of God.
[22] Once that
image of love was desecrated by sin, it had to be recast in the furnace
of divine love.The Incarnation marks the moment when the
image of the invisible
God became man, renewing man's
image in a
new creation so that men might become in Him who they were forever intended to be in
God's eyes, the
image of the
God who is love (Eph.
I would suggest also that one way into such a
new doctrine
of analogy is a
new understanding
of man or history as the
image of God, wherein historical development and evolution could be seen as a reflection or embodiment
of the development and evolution
of God.
The Incarnation marks the moment when the
image ofthe invisible
God became man, renewing man's
image in a
new creation so that men might become in Him who they were forever intended to be in
God's eyes, the
image of the
God who is love (Eph.
God's work
of love in history requires a reconception
of its meaning, the discovery
of new forms
of its expression, and the transformation
of those
images of love which have become stereotyped and impotent in this epoch.
So again in the
New Testament, the love
of God means the complete spiritual communion for which the human
image of father and son offers the most important analogy.
If we are to speak theologically, must we not finally say that this
image of God as Satan is either itself a satanic and all too modern form
of deicide, or else a
new and radical form
of the Christian faith?
In reclaiming the woman, feminist hermeneutics gives
new life to the
image of God female.
Thus
God takes away our sins, restores His
image in our hearts, and grants to us a
new birth, another chance, through the unmerited love
of His Son and our Savior, Jesus Christ.
Nils» overriding goal in life is to be further transformed into the
image of Christ and to help bring
God's
new society into this world.
Thus
God takes away our sins, restores His
image in our hearts, and grants us a
new birth, another chance, through the unmerited love
of His Son and our Savior, Jesus Christ.
A Nair reported to the missionaries that after the arrival
of Christianity among the Pulayas the «evil spirits were obliged to run away from the places» and there was «scarcely any instance
of demonical possession» among them.49 Some
of the priests
of the Pulayas who converted to Christianity demolished the
images of their deities in the presence
of the missionaries, thereby suggesting belief in the power
of the
new God which they had found in Christianity.
«Freedom,» he said, «is ever
new,» and the Church will do her part in «building a world ever more worthy
of the human person, created in the
image and likeness
of God.»
Heidegger, for example, intimates that after our present imageless era — the era in which «
God is dead» — a
new procession
of divine
images may begin.
He erroneously tries to dismiss the reference in Philippians 2:6 to Jesus being in «the form
of God» as a mistranslation
of «the
image of God,» ignoring both many parallels with the figure
of Wisdom in early Judaism and many other
New Testament texts that speak to Jesus's pre-existent divine state.
Alternatively, if the readers see that this concept
of God is rejected and can not find a
new one to which to relate the powerful
images of political theology, they may decide that the meaning
of what is said can be clarified without use
of this word.
Not only does his revision retain the original hymn's
image of God as ruling sovereign, but it gives the hymn
new credibility.
The idea that man was made in the
image of God was an affront to the belief that Soviet power could make a
New Man.
Biblical visions and
images of the rule
of Christ such as a heavenly city, the household
of God, a
new heaven and earth, a marriage feast, and an unending day culminate in the
image of the kingdom.
The myth
of America as «
God's
new Israel» was a part
of the national self -
image quite apart from formal theological considerations or specific biblical references.
The expectation that
God was bringing the Reformation to completion in America has been part
of the national self -
image since the seventeenth century when English Puritans settled
New England and Scottish Presbyterians settled in the middle colonies.
Although Paul uses other figures to describe this saving work
of Christ (as, for example, his having become a
new Adam, a
new representative man, thus restoring in the race the
image of God which sin had marred), this is his most characteristic interpretation
of the meaning
of the man Jesus and his work.
God's righteousness is his justice, and his justice is manifest in his working to put down the unrighteous, expose idols, show mercy, and achieve reconciliation in a
new order which expresses man s dignity as bearer
of the divine
image.
Thus our surrender in faith to the paradoxical
image of God's own proximity to the lost and repressed aspects
of the world (and therefore to the excluded aspects
of our own selves, which are also a part
of that same lost world) can bring a
new intelligibility and truthfulness into the understanding
of our own lives.
In faith's response to its kenotic
image of God there lies a surprising way
of bringing
new meaning to our normally confused sense
of mystery, to our puzzlement about evolution and other recent discoveries about the physical universe, to our perplexity at the broken state
of social existence, and finally to our own individual longings and sufferings.
In performing an act that is traditionally limited to
God, as Job 9:8 indicates, Jesus by his use
of «I AM» reveals the identity and destiny
of the
new humanity, that community
of «life - giving spirits» that is willed by
God to be transformed into the
image and stature
of the risen Lord.
Attendantly, from within this millenarian orientation, Jesus himself was identified with the bar nasha
of Daniel 7:13 — 14, a type
of new Adam, who, on the basis
of his appearance before the Ancient
of Days, recovered the characteristics that distinguish the human being created in the
image and likeness
of God: dominion, glory, and kingship (see Ps.
The process theology which informs our interpretation
of Christian faith agrees wholeheartedly with this view
of the
image of God in man; but it proposes a distinctive addition to the doctrine, for process theology sees love disclosed in a history in which the spirit
of God creates
new forms.
In his essay, «The Christology
of the
New Testament,» Rudolf Bultmann runs through a catalogue of Christological images — Messiah, Son of David, Son of God, Son of Man, Lord (Kurios), Word (Logos)-- and claims that none of them are n
New Testament,» Rudolf Bultmann runs through a catalogue
of Christological
images — Messiah, Son
of David, Son
of God, Son
of Man, Lord (Kurios), Word (Logos)-- and claims that none
of them are
newnew.
I would only hope we recognize that our
new nature (which can not sin) is alien to our old - nature we drag with us, and it is by
God's grace any
of us are subject to
God's conforming us into the
image of The Son and building us up as a whole with all the saints into the full measure
of spiritual adulthood belonging to the Humanity
of our great
God and Savior Jesus our Lord and Master.
David Cairns, The
image of God in Man (
New York: Philosophical Library, 1953).
In reviewing different metaphors and
images of the atonement in the
New Testament and the works
of Brunner, Aulen, Luther and others, the author posits that the best approach is through an understanding
of God's reconciling love as seen in Christ and as experienced in disclosure, suffering, communication and community.
No, we honor and revere
new life because we know all people are created in the
image of God and are... dare I say... worthy
of being loved by Him and by us.
Herodotus tells us that the coastal Ionian city
of Phocaea, faced with the likelihood
of conquest by the Persians, up and left, packing «even the
images of their
gods,» sailing out eventually to found a
new city at Rhegium in Italy.
We start with a sketch
of the mental
image conveyed by the word «
God» in the world view which obtained in Christendom before the
new world began to emerge.
Following the lead
of the Council, the
new Catechism
of the Catholic Church begins with theology» the human person made in the
image of God and called to share in the life
of the Trinity.
The
image of God as a supernatural being, who from time to time intervenes in the affairs
of the natural world in clearly recognizable ways, and who can suspend or reverse the usual behavior
of natural phenomena, if He so wishes, in order to perform His will, is one which has become less and less tenable as the
new world has emerged.
Gustaf Wingren in Skapelsen och Lagen (Creation and Law) says that the
New Testament calls Christ himself the
image of God.