The appointees had been chosen through
the new judicial application process introduced by the federal government last year.
The Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, Jody Wilson - Raybould, has announced several new judges in Quebec, British Columbia, Alberta and Newfoundland and Labrador — all under
the new judicial application process the government announced last fall.
Not exact matches
In his dissent, though, Justice Hugo Black warned of this
new application of
judicial power:
(3) Neither the Executive Committee nor the County Leader shall designate, nominate or propose any candidate for
judicial offices which are to be elected county - wide in
New York County, or which are to be proposed for appointment by the Mayor of the City of
New York or by the Governor of the State of
New York, exclusive of recommendations for interim appointment by the Mayor or the Governor, unless such candidate shall have been approved in that calendar year for such office by the independent panel., except that once a candidate for the office of Justice of the Supreme Court has been reported as highly qualified by at least two of the last four independent screening panels for that office, that candidate shall be considered as having been approved by the panel for such office during each of the four calendar years after the year in which the candidate shall have last achieved such status, (not counting a year in which there are no vacancies for the office of Justice of the Supreme Court other than a vacancy resulting from the expiration of the term of office of a justice eligible for and seeking re-election to that office, or a vacancy which has been filled by an interim Supreme Court justice seeking re-election who has been appointed by the Governor and who satisfies the requirements of sub-paragraph 4 (b), provided in each case that such justice has been determined by the independent panel to merit continuation in office), and such candidate shall not make
application to the panel during any of such years unless the Committee on the Judiciary shall require the candidate to make such an
application.
In early May, the Independent
Judicial Screening Committee of Bronx Democratic County Committee (IJSC) concluded the application submission period for candidates interested in the elected judicial positions that will occur in the 2017 election cycle in and for the County of the Bronx, City and State of N
Judicial Screening Committee of Bronx Democratic County Committee (IJSC) concluded the
application submission period for candidates interested in the elected
judicial positions that will occur in the 2017 election cycle in and for the County of the Bronx, City and State of N
judicial positions that will occur in the 2017 election cycle in and for the County of the Bronx, City and State of
New York.
Earlier this month, the provincial government announced
new policies around
judicial appointments, including options on
application forms» to self - identify as Indigenous,... [more]
In our contribution to Ars Aequi we reveal the Roman roots of the preliminary reference procedure, explain the inception and
application of the instrument by the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg and discuss the potential of this
new instrument for
judicial law making by the Dutch Supreme Court.
She has acted on behalf of applicants, objectors, responsible authorities and licensing authorities across the whole spectrum of licensing
applications, from
new applications to reviews and appeals in the Magistrates» Courts, and
judicial review
applications.
Representing a leading motorsports and technology business in the Court of Appeal on a
Judicial Review
application made by several parties in respect of the Council's approval of its proposed move to
new headquarters.
As there is, so far, very little
judicial comment on this
new duty, the
application of s 172 in Franbar and Mission Capital is of considerable interest.
We've learned of a
new Practice Direction on Filing Electronic Versions of Documents in Civil Appeals and
Judicial Review
Applications in the Divisional Court which will be implemented next month — it establishes a regularized process to satisfy the requirement to file electronic versions of factums and transcripts — a requirement that is already in place under Rules 61.09 and 61.12 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.
In particular, the FCA reasoned that because the outcome of the environmental assessment and regulatory review (the report of the Joint Review Panel in this case) was merely a recommendation to Cabinet under the
new legislative scheme, «no decisions about legal or practical interests had been made» and thus no
application for
judicial review lay from the report.
Over the past year I've written about the Emoluments Clause; the No Religious Tests clause; limits on presidential power as defined in the steel seizure case; the meaning of the oath of office; how the Appropriations Clause constrains lawsuit settlements involving the federal government; how and whether gerrymandering by race and for partisan advantage affects constitutional rights;
judicial independence; the decline and fall of the Contracts Clause; the
application of Obergefell to issues of public employees and birth certificates; Article V procedure for calling a
new constitutional convention; and too many First, Second, Fourth, and Fifth Amendment controversies to list.
Both the judge hearing the original
application and the Court of Appeal held that the proper standard of
judicial review was set forth in the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Dunsmuir v.
New Brunswick, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190.