In recent years I have experimented with different kinds of involvement in social issues — with limited success — and I have done some thinking about what form
a new social gospel movement might take.
Where one works in full - time employment and how one approaches that work is of crucial importance for
the new social gospel movement that I envision; volunteer work is not enough.
The theology of
the new social gospel movement will be as diverse as its members.
Everyone in
the new social gospel movement should have the opportunity to belong to a support group that meets regularly.
We of
the new social gospel movement can draw on the insights and power of this tradition as we argue for our positions.
Not exact matches
Matt asks:»... What I'd like to see from you and the other prophets of
social media publish are the top 10 things I can do immediately that will help me spread the
gospel of home ownership and drive brand preference to CENTURY 21...» Interestingly, my response quickly reached the first page of the Google results for the phrase «Century 21 Real Estate» a company with 8,000 offices worldwide, proof that
new marketing works.
Every
New Testament
Gospel portrays Jesus influencing the people around his
social circle when he wasn't preaching to the masses in a number of subtle ways.
Gabe Lyons rightfully points out that although many traditional Christians accuse this
new breed of Christians of abandoning the
gospel for «
social justice» issues, the exact opposite is true.
For all of the
new imperial
social entitlements they received, the ancient bishops — even with mixed motives — insisted on being who they were: teachers of the
gospel.
The argument is that the Chicago school arose in the context of the
social gospel, a movement that had much in common with contemporary political theology and that, under the stimulus of political theology, this school can recover something of what it had lost as well as move forward in
new ways.
In spite of the war's terrible blow against the advance of the Kingdom and in the face of this
new German scholarship, the
social gospel held its grip on the gay «20's.
If one means, for instance, an epistemological privilege of the oppressed, in the sense that the poor, the suffering and the dispossessed have some intuitive knowledge of God, righteousness and
social reality not available to others; if one means that victims know best how to overcome their condition and build new institutions; and if one means that knowledge based on «experience» makes academic excellence unnecessary, then liberation thought and the Social Gospel di
social reality not available to others; if one means that victims know best how to overcome their condition and build
new institutions; and if one means that knowledge based on «experience» makes academic excellence unnecessary, then liberation thought and the
Social Gospel di
Social Gospel diverge.
What I have found most relevant is Colossians ch.3 in the light of which it is legitimate to speak of the
gospel as the news of the
New Man Jesus Christ («Put on the new self, the new humanity»); and more especially it is valid to present the new fellowship of mutual forgiveness created by the Divine Forgiveness in Christ and expressed in the Eucharist and the social koinonia of the church as the foretaste of true human community as the essential gospel («Forgiving one another as the Lord forgave you»
New Man Jesus Christ («Put on the
new self, the new humanity»); and more especially it is valid to present the new fellowship of mutual forgiveness created by the Divine Forgiveness in Christ and expressed in the Eucharist and the social koinonia of the church as the foretaste of true human community as the essential gospel («Forgiving one another as the Lord forgave you»
new self, the
new humanity»); and more especially it is valid to present the new fellowship of mutual forgiveness created by the Divine Forgiveness in Christ and expressed in the Eucharist and the social koinonia of the church as the foretaste of true human community as the essential gospel («Forgiving one another as the Lord forgave you»
new humanity»); and more especially it is valid to present the
new fellowship of mutual forgiveness created by the Divine Forgiveness in Christ and expressed in the Eucharist and the social koinonia of the church as the foretaste of true human community as the essential gospel («Forgiving one another as the Lord forgave you»
new fellowship of mutual forgiveness created by the Divine Forgiveness in Christ and expressed in the Eucharist and the
social koinonia of the church as the foretaste of true human community as the essential
gospel («Forgiving one another as the Lord forgave you»).
The Eastern Orthodox delegation asked to be excused from voting on the other reports; but they heartily supported this one, which affirmed that the message of the church to the world must always remain the
gospel of Jesus Christ — the gift of a
new word from God to this old world of sin and death, being the prophetic call to sinful men to turn to God as the only way by which humanity can escape from those class and race hatreds which devastate society, and fulfill humanity's longing for intellectual sincerity,
social justice and spiritual inspiration.
This progressive
New England family is headed by Kenneth C. MacArthur, pastor of the Federated Church in Sterling Massachusetts, lecturer at Andover Newton Seminary, advocate for the
Social Gospel, and spokesman for the American Eugenics Society.
Second, whereas the
social gospel had seen a series of
social goals that could be achieved, one by one, by mobilizing the loving energies of Christians, Niebuhr saw that the achievement of one set of goals, however meritorious, always led to a
new balance of power that would in its turn be corrupted.
Already in the twenties, a few sensitive American Christians were hearing the
new voices from central Europe and reappraising the
social gospel in light of these.
Many young people in Latin America, who were motivated by the
Gospel to love their neighbor and be concerned for justice and freedom in their society, have often become Marxists simply because their churches did not provide biblical instruction about Christian discipleship, or because they [their churches] were blind to clear demands from the Bible and opportunities and challenges provided by
new social situations.80
Here was a
new prophet of the
social gospel!
Theology has not given adequate attention to the
social idealizations of evil... The
new thing in the
social gospel is the clearness and insistence with which it sets forth the necessity and the possibility of redeeming the historical life of humanity from the
social wrongs which now pervade it... The
social gospel seeks to bring men under repentance for their collective sins and to create a more sensitive and more modern conscience.
The alleged subordination of the
gospel to Karl Marx is illustrated, for example, by charging that «false» liberation theology concentrates too much on a few selected biblical texts that are always given a political meaning, leading to an overemphasis on «material» poverty and neglecting other kinds of poverty; that this leads to a «temporal messianism» that confuses the Kingdom of God with a purely «earthly»
new society, so that the
gospel is collapsed into nothing but political endeavor; that the emphasis on
social sin and structural evil leads to an ignoring or forgetting of the reality of personal sin; that everything is reduced to praxis (the interplay of action and reflection) as the only criterion of faith, so that the notion of truth is compromised; and that the emphasis on communidades de base sets a so - called «people's church» against the hierarchy.
As for early influences, probably no one has directed my thinking more than Walter Rauschenbusch, a Baptist minister who was born in 1861 in upstate
New York, and whose emphasis on the
social gospel and the church of Love rather than the Church of Law spoke to me in seminary in a way that changed my thinking forever.
To make clear what is
new in this approach to the
social gospel let us take the analogy of the family.
In the heyday of the liberal
social gospel which occurred at the same time that form criticism and other important
New Testament studies were making a fresh impact on Christian thought, the kingdom was considerably explored.
Charles Elliott in Prayering the Kingdom, Towards a Political Spirituality (
New York: Paulist Press, 1985) also links the
gospel with the coming of the Kingdom and argues for an approach to the
social needs of the world that emphasizes grace rather than guilt and powerlessness.
ii, vii; D. D. Williams, The Andover Liberals (
New York: King's Crown Press, 1941); C. H. Hopkins, The Rise of the
Social Gospel in American Protestantism 1865 - 1915 (
New Haven: Yale University Press, 1940).
It was a
social gospel they proclaimed, yes — but only as the
gospel of the coming Reign of God over all the earth, and as the
new Halakak, the description of «life in accordance with the sayings of the Lord» who was God's final Messenger to his elect.
After Oxford, the
social Gospel began to have a
new orientation.
With the emergence of
new concern in our own century for the people caught in problems of urbanization, racial discrimination, industrialization, and the like, the churches moved first — through the so - called
social gospel movement — to correct the previous emphasis on soul - saving as dealing only with individual persons.
It would not be surprising if a
new «Indian
Social Gospel» were to come from these developments.
The
Social Gospel contributed to Franklin Roosevelt's
New Deal, which preserved capitalism by giving some support to labor and relief and security to the poor.
Secondly, if Christian leaders use the concepts of the
new ethic without explicitly clarifying what distinguishes them from the
social doctrine of the Church and from the
gospel, as is often the case, the faithful will be at a loss and will tend not to discern the difference.
The revolutionary
social, economic, and intellectual developments in post-Civil War America stimulated within Protestantism attempts to develop a
new prophetic ministry which would exercise critical judgment on the injustices which accompanied the radical changes of the period and would point the way to a
new application of the
gospel to the
social needs of the time.
There are
new theological articulations arising from black awareness, from women's consciousness and from movements for
social justice.8 But the heart of the Christian
gospel is still the experience of forgiveness, love and grace in personal life.
If by
social gospel they mean the good news that God loves the world and intends to redeem it, that God is building a
new kingdom in our midst under the authority of Jesus Christ, and that we show our allegiance to this kingdom whenever we love our enemies, serve the poor, turn the other cheek, pursue holiness, preach the
gospel, and care for the least of these — then yes, I suppose I have.
It has been the merit of the
social gospel and of political theology to emphasize this point in the twentieth century, but it is certainly not
new.
Actually as Brown himself admits, this «
new key» in theology is very similar to the
social gospel movement instituted by Walter Rauschenbusch and other Protestant liberals.
Robert McAfee Brown, one of the most vigorous defenders of this brand of liberation theology (Theology in a
New Key, Westminster, 1978), claims that its major concern is to «see the world in the light of the
gospel through the eyes of the oppressed,» using Marxism as the chief instrument for
social analysis.
In the 1880s Walter Rauschenbusch was a Baptist pastor in the Hell's Kitchen district of
New York City, where he served a poor, hurting, immigrant congregation and where he converted to the
social gospel.
Florida, USA About Blog Brian D. McLaren is an author, speaker, activist and networker among innovative Christian leaders.He has written dozen - plus books & assisted in the development of several
new churches.His public speaking covers a broad range of topics including the
gospel and global crises; theology & postmodernity; liturgy, preaching & spiritual formation; evangelism & inter-religious dialogue; faith &
social justice.
Florida, USA About Blog Brian D. McLaren is an author, speaker, activist and networker among innovative Christian leaders.He has written dozen - plus books & assisted in the development of several
new churches.His public speaking covers a broad range of topics including the
gospel and global crises; theology & postmodernity; liturgy, preaching & spiritual formation; evangelism & inter-religious dialogue; faith &
social justice.
Florida, USA About Blog Brian D. McLaren is an author, speaker, activist and networker among innovative Christian leaders.He has written dozen - plus books & assisted in the development of several
new churches.His public speaking covers a broad range of topics including the
gospel and global crises; theology & postmodernity; liturgy, preaching & spiritual formation; evangelism & inter-religious dialogue; faith &
social justice.