For one thing, in getting a waiver from the federal No Child Left Behind Act, Indiana (like other states) promised the Obama administration it would adopt standards that met federal criteria; align curricula and teaching; select, pilot, and administer
new tests aligned to the standards; and integrate the standards into both school - and teacher - accountability systems.
Parents will soon receive for the first time their children's scores on
new tests aligned to the standards.
With Pence's support, it becomes more likely Indiana will become the first to leave the Common Core initiative, though many others have taken a step back from national consortiums designing
new tests aligned to the standards.
The state promised to turn around its poorest performing schools over the course of four years, evaluate teachers based in part on student test scores, increase the use of technology in the classroom, and use more rigorous academic standards along with
new tests aligned to those standards.
Not exact matches
Backlash over the rollout of the Common Core learning
standards, along with
aligned state
tests and
new teacher evaluations, came
to a head last April when more than 20 percent of the state's eligible students refused
to take the state standardized math and English language arts exams.
He criticized Cuomo's efforts
to improve the implementation of the
standards during this legislative session, which included
new laws that prevent Common Core -
aligned tests from being used for students» permanent records or in promotion decisions.
Last year, 20 percent of
New York students refused
to take state
tests,
aligned to the Common Core
standards for higher achievement.
The mandatory
tests are supposed
to align with the
new standards, but teachers for several years have complained that the curriculum guides and
tests have been poorly implemented by the state.
With six weeks
to go before students take
new Common Core -
aligned state
tests, the Department of Education on March 4 finally announced recommended curriculums designed
to meet the
standards.
Publishers are aggressively pushing curricula that claim
to be
aligned with the
new standards, but district purchasing officers can not just go
to the clearinghouse and search for
tested Common Core curricula.
Parents are reacting
to a comment made by Arne Duncan that some of the opposition
to Common Core
standards comes from white suburban moms who are upset that their children are not doing well on the
new common core -
aligned tests.
The state contracted with private, nonprofit organizations
to develop
new curricula
aligned to the common core, developed a web site that included sample lessons and professional - development materials, and then developed a
new assessment tied
to the
standards and administered it in the spring of 2013 — two years before most states had planned
to put
new tests in place.
Providing a more honest assessment of student performance was one of the goals of the Common Core initiative and the
new tests created by states that are meant
to align to the
new, higher
standards.
At least one of the two
new assessment - development consortia could — probably in the name of «performance assessment» and «career readiness» — easily drown in the soft stuff, in which case the
tests it is building may not do justice
to the academic
standards with which they are meant
to be
aligned.
As I have repeatedly said would eventually happen, the teacher unions are turning against Common Core in
New York and threatening
to do the same in other states if high stakes
tests aligned to those
standards are put in place.
Montgomery County, Md. is creating a comprehensive elementary school curriculum
aligned to the Common Core
standards as part of a $ 2.25 million agreement with Pearson, an education publisher that will make the
new curriculum (as well as supplemental training materials and
tests) available worldwide.
With the release last week of half of the
test questions from the most recent round of
New York State Common Core ELA / Literacy and math
tests, we can now begin
to see if the
tests are, as one
New York principal insisted last spring, «confusing, developmentally inappropriate and not well
aligned with the Common Core
standards.»
First, misaligned assessments undermine the critical link between what is reported in accountability systems (
test - score and teacher - evaluation data) and what districts purport
to value (Common Core —
aligned instruction, student success with the
new standards).
I expect that PARCC and Smarter Balanced (the two federally subsidized consortia of states that are developing
new assessments meant
to be
aligned with Common Core
standards) will fade away, eclipsed and supplanted by long - established yet fleet - footed
testing firms that already possess the infrastructure, relationships, and durability that give them huge advantages in the competition for state and district business.
In Tennessee the union got the legislature
to approve a delay in rolling out
new tests aligned with the
standards.
ExamView offers a bank of thousands of
test items
aligned to state
standards across subjects which teachers can use
to create and administer online quizzes and
tests, and which refreshes with
new items if the same student takes the quiz again.
The Common Core
standards initiative was launched in 2009 but by the time
new tests aligned with those
standards were rolled out 4
to 5 years later, there was mounting opposition
to using those
tests to evaluate teachers and schools.
They went whole - hog, all - in, with a scope - and - sequence, instructional units, interim assessments
aligned to the
new standards, and a year - end summative
test aligned as well... (contd)
Despite fraying of the two national consortia developing assessments tied
to the
new standards, schools are preparing for the first full - scale administration of those common - core -
aligned tests.
Educators are concerned because so much is still unclear about the implementation of the
tests, and whether the resources being created
to align with the
new standards will truly teach what students are meant
to learn.
Race
to the Top rewarded states with hundreds of millions of dollars in exchange for the adoption of
new college - and career - ready assessments
aligned to higher
standards, among other requirements, but the Education Department didn't define those
standards or
tests.
Now that the
tests in many states are getting harder in order
to align with the
new Common Core
standards and being used
to grade teachers, not just students, they're also producing a lot of anxiety among parents and teachers, too.
With threats of federal repercussions waylaid by the government shutdown, Gov. Jerry Brown on Wednesday signed a bill that suspends most standardized
tests and replaces them with a no - stakes field
test aligned to the
new Common Core
standards.
First - year scores on the
new standardized
tests aligned to the Common Core
standards showed that 34 percent of California's students met achievement targets in math, and 44 percent met achievement targets in English language arts.
Last spring more than 3 million students in California, the largest number ever
to take an online
test in the state, took field
tests of
new assessments
aligned to the Common Core state
standards without major technical breakdowns or system crashes, according
to state officials.
Most of the dropping out, so far, hasn't taken the form of repudiating the Common Core
standards themselves but, rather, exiting from the twin assessment consortia that were created
to develop
new Common Core -
align tests.
In «The Common Core Takes Hold,» Robert Rothman of the Alliance for Excellent Education acknowledges a number of McShane's concerns: states» shrinking budgets will likely impact the funding necessary for implementation; there is little
to no quality monitoring of the
new resources that are being created; the
new assessments — and the technology required
to implement them — are hugely expensive; the public at large is poorly informed and their support for the
standards is waning; and a significant drop in student
test scores following implementation of Common Core -
aligned assessments is a real concern.
Parents are reacting
to a comment by Arne Duncan that some of the opposition
to Common Core
standards comes from white suburban moms who are upset that their children are not doing well on the
new common core -
aligned tests.
First, misaligned assessments undermine the critical link between what is reported in accountability systems (
test - score and teacher - evaluation data) and what districts purport
to value (Common Core —
aligned instruction and student success with the
new standards).
We know states are changing their
tests to align to the
new standards, and those changes have inevitably bred uncertainty, anxiety, and even hostility, especially when results could carry high stakes someday.
And at first blush it looked like they had achieved it, with about 45 states committing
to adopt the
new set of
standards and federally - sponsored standardized
tests aligned to those
standards.
But because the
standards emphasize critical thinking and citing evidence, most teachers expect that
new tests aligned with the Common Core will require students
to write essays based on multiple reading passages.
The IDOE is already soliciting vendors for a brand
new test beginning the 2015 - 2016 school year, but the state still has
to provide a
test aligned with the
new academic
standards to students this coming spring.
The
new state
tests aligned to the
standards were harder, and scores dropped right away.
Based on conditions in the state's No Child Left Behind waiver, that meant officials also had
to provide a
test aligned with the
new standards to students this coming spring.
Bill Would Overhaul Student
Testing in California A key hearing is set today for consideration of what may prove to be landmark legislation that would replace the state's existing statewide student performance testing program with one that is designed to be taken online and is also aligned with the new common core curriculum sta
Testing in California A key hearing is set today for consideration of what may prove
to be landmark legislation that would replace the state's existing statewide student performance
testing program with one that is designed to be taken online and is also aligned with the new common core curriculum sta
testing program with one that is designed
to be taken online and is also
aligned with the
new common core curriculum
standards.
But by pushing back the timeline for adopting the framework, the board may now face a dilemma as
to whether it should similarly extend the timeline for the next two major phases of implementing the science
standards: adopting a list of curriculum materials
aligned with the
new standards, and developing and administering a science assessment or
test to measure how well students are understanding the
new standards.
This spring, about 600 schools across the state will pilot parts of a
new end - of - year exam developed by the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC), a group of states working together
to develop
new computer - based assessments
aligned to the
new standards that they hope will
test deeper understanding of concepts.
Since the 2015 - 2016 school year marked the second year of
new tests aligned with the Common Core, policymakers and advocates can finally start
to compare
test scores over time and see how student achievement has changed under the
standards.
A key hearing is set today for consideration of what may prove
to be landmark legislation that would replace the state's existing statewide student performance
testing program with one that is designed
to be taken online and is also
aligned with the
new common core curriculum
standards.
This spring, as Indiana lawmakers debated whether
to leave the Common Core initiative, students in neighboring Kentucky were taking
new state
tests aligned to the nationally - crafted academic
standards.
The drop in
test scores is attributable
to the transition
to new national academic
standards that have yet
to be
aligned with the state assessments — and that's lead some
to question the
new standards or call for a moratorium on
testing.
In
New York, fewer than one - third of students were found
to be up
to Common Core English Language Arts
standards in the 2012 - 2013 school year — down from 55 percent on non-Core
aligned tests the previous year.
By Spring of 2015, most of these states plan
to administer state
tests that have been
aligned to the
new standards.
She pointed
to the positive steps taken by
New York with its adoption of Common Core
standards and
aligned testing, which offers more rigorous assessments than NAEP.