[7] The term «classical liberalism» was applied in retrospect to distinguish earlier 19th - century liberalism from
the newer social liberalism.
Not exact matches
Liberalism and Marxism, which both saw natural law as carrying history upward to a
new, glorious age, have been challenged by the
social dynamics of Spengler, Nietzsche, Toynbee, and Sorokin.
The dominant interpretation on the left was that we were now entering a
new era of
liberalism and that
social liberalism was a winner outside of a few Southern backwaters.
This is important, I believe, in order to contextualize the real import of liberation theology as calling for a
new realization of
social justice in dialectical contradiction to conservatism and
liberalism.
Rather, the man who had first worked at the intersection of ideas and power during his World War II service at the British Embassy in Washington was a Russo - English exponent of classic American
New Deal
liberalism: a liberal who believed that government had an obligation to secure the economic,
social, and educational conditions under which people could truly exercise their liberty.
But the great tradition was kept alive in the
social liberalism of the «Right Reverend
New Dealer,» Msgr. John A. Ryan, and was revived among the bishops in the late 1940s and 1950s under the episcopal leadership of men like Detroit's Edward Mooney, Chicago's Albert Meyer, and St. Louis» Joseph Ritter.
The Dolan Project, in other words, is much less a matter of
new facts than of
new interpretive filters, of «a tendency to endorse as theological
liberalism what the old [historiography] endorsed as
social and procedural
liberalism.»
We (I was the Liberal Democrats» director of policy between 1999 and 2004) developed a modern restatement of the
social liberalism, called «New Liberalism» in its day, espoused by Hobhouse: social liberalism, greened and decentralised to meet the challenges of the 21s
liberalism, called «
New Liberalism» in its day, espoused by Hobhouse: social liberalism, greened and decentralised to meet the challenges of the 21s
Liberalism» in its day, espoused by Hobhouse:
social liberalism, greened and decentralised to meet the challenges of the 21s
liberalism, greened and decentralised to meet the challenges of the 21st century.
This strangely purist and anti-pluralist version of «
new liberalism» ignores the fact that all successful governing projects involve building ideological and
social coalitions.
A number of features stand out: gender; left - wing identity;
social liberalism; campaign activism; feelings about the leadership; and the possibility that the ranks of the
newer members, and those that support Jeremy Corbyn, may have been swollen by what we call «educated left - behinds» — people who, given their qualifications, might have been expecting to earn more than they currently do.
Under our
new leadership we will build on the proud history of
social liberalism within our Party and work towards the rejection of tribalism, class based politics and anti-state libertarianism.
We will host a discussion around economic policy over on our
new blog dedicated to
social liberal economics, PlanC.socialliberal.net, and there will of course be a full an open debate on ownership, democracy and power, at the SLF Conference in Manchester on July 13th — here, we will focus on the wider politics of
social liberalism.