About the closest he came to expressing support for prevailing - wage laws came during an interview with
the news organization WisPolitics.
In other words, this would constitute a permeation of the traditional «wall» between the business and editorial sides of a legacy
news organization.
That basic question came up in the Politics Online Conference session on Web 2.0 and politics, soon after the mention of the role of comments on
news organization sites in helping activists bypass media filters.
I believe it is fair to say that no responsible, legitimate
news organization would NOT report such an incident.
A news organization should be embarrassed this give away to our anti democratic leaders.
«We agree that «NY1 is a New York City based, legitimate
news organization.»
It must be said that it's kind of odd Cuomo would make this claim, given there's been plenty of off - narrative stories written before that have sometimes resulted in pre-emptive statements attacking
the news organization's credibility.
I was eager to climb the career ladder, with aspirations to manage my own
news organization someday.
I'm appalled that you think that when you post your story publicly on the internet as part of advertisement or justification for your business that
a news organization is «stealing» it when they read it and report on it.
Just this week, Hurtado issued a letter of apology after Peck sent an e-mail to a Plainfield Patch reporter claiming
the news organization for which she worked was not «legitimate» and that the district was discontinuing communications with the news outlet.
In that e-mail, Peck also told the reporter to «find another fish to fry» and that the park district no longer was
the news organization's «piñata.»
Just this week, Plainfield Township Park District Board President Peter Hurtado issued a letter of apology after Peck sent an e-mail to a Plainfield Patch reporter claiming
the news organization for which she worked was not «legitimate» and that the district was discontinuing communications with the news outlet.
They said the lawsuit poses a challenge to the right of
a news organization «to explore matters of obvious public interest — what is in the food we eat and how that food is labeled.»
The Huffington Post this week reported that a Jimmy John's employment agreement was shared with
the news organization and it includes a «non-competition» clause for its sandwich makers.
B. Major international
news organization is nefariously conspiring to censor your very important posts.
When CNN allows this kind of stuff to be published it shows that it is not a serious
news organization — not serious about scholarship and will let anyone write whatever sort of junk they want.
Isn't it odd
a news organization which insists on «free speech» protection for itself doesn't for others?
I'm getting confused with the right wing Christian
news organization called FOX.
Isn't CNN
a news organization?
Really... «WWJD» articles from a national
news organization like CNN?!
This ridiculous piece of so called «journalism» just underscores the cowardice of a so - called
news organization that is so enamored with Obama that they will run this and not even question the events in Libya and the mounting evidence that our president acted irresponsibly and is now engaged in a cover - up deserving of impeachment?
Seems more befitting some goofy blog rather than a supposedly professional
news organization.
With CNN being such a quality and unbiased
news organization, I suspect they'll be publishing, any day now, a list of businesses that actively promote gay marriage.
As
a news organization, should you not be committed to facts, the truth and evidence based reporting?
You are supposed to be
a news organization.
Any reason to believe that a professional
news organization didn't check the facts?
And if per chance no one did and this Mosque sprung up out of nowhere you would be shaming
every news organization for not letting the public know what was going on.
Are you accusing
a news organization of being pro human rights?
I would strongly favor a constitutional amendment that creates, and permanently funds, an independent
news organization.
Whether or not they are actually
a news organization is yet another debate...
It makes perfect sense to me that
a news organization wouldn't want to offend its customers.
Brewster said he'd told CNN the women were Vietnamese, not Cambodian, and CNN had botched its reporting (CNN released its own statement, saying
the news organization stood by its reporting, though they changed a headline that identified the women as Cambodian.).
I find it irresponsible that a major
news organization like CNN even has this belief blog, given what usually appears to be a right - wing theocratic agenda to keep the gullible masses ignorant.
CNN is
a news organization and can write what it believes to be news.
Once it was made part of the mission statement, I thought it was weird that
a news organization would take such a strong position because it is quite bizarre.
Exactly why does
any news organization consider Rush qualified to speak on the subject of the Bible or Catholicism?
This is not a fitting headline for
a news organization.
On another day, I saw a post by
a news organization about some new protests over the national anthem.
It has no place at all in
a news organization, which is supposed to be uncovering * facts *, not propagating dangerous myths.
How very, very pitiful for
a news organization, or shall we say, an gossip entertainment organization?
If you are so bothered by
a news organization writing on such a topic, why did you bother to read it in the first place?
CNN is a stupid liberal trash
news organization
That a major
news organization reports on exorcism in 2011 as if it were real, is astonishing.
Fox «News» is not a legitimate
news organization.
In a column that he wrote for the Center for Public Integrity, a nonprofit investigative
news organization, where he works as a senior analyst, he wrote:
Sarah Palin and others have started rumors of an Obama «death panel» in which the elderly and mentally handicapped will be sentenced to death as a result of a public option, rumors that every reputable
news organization and independent analysis group has denounced as ridiculous.
cnn is not a real
news organization.
Rather than simply read the article, a scant few inches up the page, a few finger - flicks of a scroll wheel, he demonstrates that he would rather assume and blame
a news organization for something that did not occur.
Oh, how I miss it when CNN was a legitimate
news organization, rather than a political ad for the liberal agenda.