sod (12:29:42) You should have read
the next couple of paragraphs, the data goes to beyond 1935.
Of course, if you'd prefer to stay unsullied on that front, we'd advise you to skip
the next couple of paragraphs and remain — as Bird might prefer — on the other side of the curtain.
Not exact matches
As he puts it: «I'd like to CHALLENGE every woman in tech who's a) got a nice care, b) owns a nice house, or c) is making over $ 125K a year to start thinking
of themselves as the
next Ron Conway or Esther Dyson in the making and commit to investing in startups...» I'll forgive him for the poor grammar, ditto for the wisecrack a
couple of paragraphs later about how some
of us might have spent $ 5,000 to $ 10,000 on our MBAs... or our wardrobes.
The second has to do with the bigger plot elements that includes gobs
of spoilers, so skip the
next couple paragraphs if that sort
of thing is antithema to you.
Next is a
couple of body
paragraphs detailing some
of the plot details without too many spoilers and in that space the literary merits
of the manuscript can be mentioned.
Next, each
paragraph should focus on a single point which it can then elaborate on in a
couple of sentences.