I know there is pressure to present a >
nice tidy story as regards «apparent unprecedented warming in a thousand > years or more in the proxy data» but in reality the situation is not quite > so simple.
This one, dating back a decade, particularly seems to show pressures within the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to send a strong message: «I know there is pressure to present
a nice tidy story as regards «apparent unprecedented warming in a thousand years or more in the proxy data» but in reality the situation is not quite so simple...»]
Keith Briffa, whose team reconstructed the contradictory temperature graph, was furious, and wrote: «I know there is pressure to present
a nice tidy story as regards «apparent unprecedented warming in a thousand years or more in the proxy data.»»
Until someone can explain why there was pressure to tell
a nice tidy story, and why (if) that pressure went away, I'm not going to take reconstructions like this seriously.
Again, a scientific consensus was implied — providing
a nice tidy story.