Only two of the 11 models used to project future warming in the most recent report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) considered the effects of limited
nitrogen on plant growth; none considered phosphorus, although one paper from 2014 subsequently pointed out this omission.
Not exact matches
We continue to pour
on the
nitrogen, even as scientists report the existence of 50 «dead zones» where
nitrogen has flowed from fields to water, and resulted in an excess of
plant growth, a depletion of oxygen and the extinction of life.
«For all types of ecosystem the results show that high carbon dioxide levels can impede
plants» ability to absorb
nitrogen, and that this negative effect is partly why raised carbon dioxide has a marginal or non-existent effect
on growth in many ecosystems,» says Johan Uddling.
The claim that CO2 immediately increases
plant growth and acts as a fertilizer is a highly oversimplified argument, since
plant carbon uptake is dependent
on water, temperature, and
nitrogen suppy.
In the wake of the latest findings, Ronald Amundson, a soil biogeochemist at the University of California at Berkeley, told Chemical and Engineering News that «If there is more
nitrogen there than expected, then the constraints
on plant growth in a high - CO2 world may not be as great as we think.»
And we found the rate of permafrost thaw and its effect
on the decomposition of deep carbon will have a much bigger impact
on the carbon cycle than the availability of deep
nitrogen and its ability to spark
plant growth,» says Charles Koven of Berkeley Lab's Earth Sciences Division.
Most climate models used for the latest Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC) report assume that enough additional
nitrogen and phosphorus would be available for extra
plant growth.