Sentences with phrase «no less goals»

That's Le's vision, anyway, and she is almost dismissive of lesser goals.

Protestant sexual ethics in general have a more celebrative and less goal - oriented understanding of sexuality, and it is on this basis that contraception is not proscribed by Protestant theology.

We also have to consider that Monaco have conceded less goals than we scored tonight in their entire campaign.

Raheem Sterling is over hyped by the english media, there's no way he's worth 50mil, I would rather we keep Walcott and focus on more crucial positions like a Goalkeeper along with the defence so we concede less goals

In 14 of the 23 Pl seasons the title winning team's top scorer had 20 or less goals.

Name / games played / goals conceded / saves per goal / clean sheets Ospina / 18/0.61 / 3.18 / 0.44 Courtois / 32/0.96 / 2.10 / 0.38 Hart / 36/0.94 / 2.38 / 0.39 De Gea / 37/0.98 / 2.17 / 0.3 In other words, Ospina conceded less goals, made more saves per goal conceded and had more clean sheets than the others.

We scored 30 less goals than the top two last year which is the obvious comparative flaw.

We've conceded 2 less goals than Swansea.

Scoring less goals?

Ronaldo may have scored less goals than Messi in 2012 but the former Manchester United man scored when it mattered; Messi did not.

Might be cheaper and equally effective to buy Cech and try and concede 3,4 or 5 less goals a season.

3 at the back should give us insurance to leak less goals, it works when wing backs are mobile and effective when attacking?

So, Ospina lets in less goals and makes more saves per goal conceded than the goalies for the other top four teams.

In other words, Ospina concedes less goals, makes more saves per goal conceded and has more clean sheets per 90 minutes played.

With out top 4 defenders coming back, we can surely leak much lesser goals.

If Cech happens then # 10M to perhaps concede 2 - 4 less goals (not forgetting less conceded goals carries as much weight as additional goals scored) appears top value and a no - brainer compared to these # 30 - 50M centre forward investments.

Did you know that as at the time that Chelsea won the league they had conceded just five less goals than Arsenal and same number of goals with Southampton?

You can spend money on getting more goals scored or less goals conceded.

You know know he means business, When Arsene signed Xhaka (long ball master) and now vardy (counter attacking wizard) on top of Ozil and Alexis, Change of tactics of curse, with those in the line up I expect us to play faster and more direct, and I also expect us to lick less goals.

Szcz should be kept for 12 months, I know Szcz needed to grow up but he appears to be doing so at Roma, he has played 2 games more than Cech and he has kept 8 more clean sheets while conceding 6 less goals.

Walcott is unreliable source who performs on a limited scale, welbeck has less goals, giroud is just not enough.

Chelsea scored just 2 goals than us last season but conceded less goals and that is why Wenger was quick to get Cech to address that.

Benzema is not Real Madrid standard and the last season of Sanchez in La Liga, Benzema as a striker had less goals than Sanchez who played as a winger in a team with Messi.

We've scored 5 less goals than Chelsea in on less game, despite having Giroud injured for 3 months and having to be carried by Alexis.

This thing is now gonna help us through the whole season, whenever a team will try to score against us they will feel the need to score a perfect goal and thus they will end up with less goal attempts.

Turns out ox is as rubbish as we all think and has less goals and assists the both those mid level players.

In the second leg, when the match is already lost and no hope, the players will play their hearts out and maybe draw or loose narrowly and some wenger fans will be like the team tried and gave their all and will say Giroud is improving and that we should wait until next season and see the real Giroud and we don't need new signings and we just need to concede less goals.

All that «pace and trickery» and stuff «in his locker» and last season he scores less goals than OG, at a lower goals / min rate, a lower conversion rate and he is a Chelsea reject at Everton.

He has scored less goals than OG in the last 5 years and if he plays then Giroud doesn't — so you have to deduct OG's goals so not sure where the extra goals come from.

All of you haters rever Freddie Ljungberg who played similar position but scored much less goals for similar number of years (71 in eight years).

With sound defense and dependable defensive midfielder we will concede less goals.

We are definitely short in defence we need to buy more class defenders so we can improve as a team, if you concede less goals there's more chance of winning games

TargetEnglish defenders — 70 % of English defenders have seen a top 6 club concede less goals.

and yet Costa has a lesser goal record.

As a matter of fact Arsenal scored 4 less goals than the eventual winners Chelsea, and this should tell you that the goal return was not as bad as you want us to believe.

Target full backs rather than goalkeeper - an upgrade at full back sees a top 6 club concede less goals 42 % of the time.

just a quick point that giroud has been injured with a broken leg this season so obviously he would have scored less goals.

They have hailed Chelsea as the team with the best defensive record despite the fact that the Saints have more clean sheets and less goals conceded compared to Chelsea.

In other words, Ospina conceded less goals, made more saves per goal conceded and had more clean sheets.

Despite key injuries to Ozil, Giroud and Walcott, we scored 2 less goals than Chelsea, and 9 more goals than United, who finished 4th in both standings and goals for.

PL has been won 11 times with that team's top scorer amassing 19 or less goals.

His average in Philly is 0.36 (3 less goals per 82 games).

all other team got less goals.

But we only scored 2 less goals than Chelsea all season, despite missing Giroud, our main striker, for a couple of months in the autumn.

Our front 3 scored one less goal than theirs in the PL — and that with TW out most of the season.

Only Chelsea conceded less goals than the South coast side, who let in 33 as they managed to finish seventh despite several high profile departures the summer before.

We only scored 2 less goals in the PL than the Invincibles managed in 2004.

Surprisingly, and frankly I was shocked, over 60 % of the title winning teams in the past 5 years have had their designated / main centre forward scoring 16 or less goals (either with or without penalties).

But come on, give it your best shot, if nearly 2/3 of the last 60 European League titles have gone to teams with a centre forward scoring 16 or less goals from open play then how can you be SO sure?

Instead of fixating on replacing Giroud to get maybe 4 - 6 extra goals a season (and contrary to accepted popular belief there are very few if any supporters who would be upset if an upgrade came in) why can't we a bit more imaginative about this; conceding 10 less goals could have won us the title just as easily, further refining our balance between defence and attack, building on the cohesion and fledgling confidence we have built - up may, just may, bring bigger benefits than ripping the spine of the team out and starting again.