If every person devoted all efforts that we seem to throw at
this pointless debate to enlighten someone else's mind, and focused on, let's see I du n no, a clean renewable source of energy!!
Individual interpretation, for the sake of diversity, in this sense, leads to pure chaos and
pointless debates.
I definitely recommend it no matter what side of
the pointless debate you are on.
Like I said,
pointless debating because no Arsenal player can be dissected after we win a cup, standard Arsenal fan mentality....
We think it's a completely
pointless debate and explain our reasoning in this article.
I believe that a lot of our attention needs to shift away from
pointless debates (for example, low carb vs. high carb is getting really old so like get over it everyone, its a calorie deficit that makes you lose weight, not the amount of carbs).
Please no
pointless debates on this!
At this point, it's
a pointless debate / concern — nobody buys into a company / stock expecting revenue to reverse substantially.
Often, though, I find myself in
a pointless debate of the most basic, well - established physical principles.
In summary, this new appellate case is a valuable tool in the Plaintiff's arsenal and should eliminate
some pointless debates with Uninsured Motorist insurers about what is coming into evidence in a DUI injury case in Georgia.
Not exact matches
But this entire
debate is
pointless when neither decision nor indecision is even an option.
So all this
debate is
pointless to me.
Creationism / evolution
debate is
pointless, and worse, misleading to lay people.
The idea of
debating militants who behead innocent journalists may seem
pointless or even foolish to some observers.
You want to
debate stereotypes which is
pointless.
Though I have no intention of engaging you in a substantive
debate of the scriptural evidence against your views (you have made it abundantly clear it would be
pointless) I would like to comment on your behavior.
Adam and Eve are fiction, so
debating which came first is
pointless, although I think one can only conclude that it was likely Adam who then promptly rolled over and went to sleep...
Therefore this trivial
debate about the implications of the word «Atheism» seems
pointless in substance.
Using the Bible as the basis for your position in any
debate is
pointless — it doesn't persuade anyone to change their position.
We know nothing, all this
debate is
pointless, God does not require your faith to exist and either does the universe, these things exist therefor I am and so are you.
Oh religion, causing the most
pointless of
debates.
Also, the morality that was «set in stone» predated the Exodus by about 2000 years so Godspeople doesn't know what he's talking about so it's
pointless to
debate him / her / it.
I'm not one for these
pointless, heated
debates that are here, but if you sincerly have questions at all about who Jesus really is... feel free to give me a call.
Thus, any meaningful
debate is
pointless, as said believer has a fundamental lack of understanding and, more importantly KNOWLEDGE of said subject matter.
The
debate of which striker we should sign is
pointless until we find out who is going to be in charge of the team.
I'm not going to
debate it with you, it's
pointless given we've just won the FA cup and nobody can accept any player critique at that point in time.
Either way it's
pointless to
debate since he's untouchable with Wenger there.
At the end of the day I don't care what other clubs are doing, we can
debate the why and how all day long but don't forget the clubs you are referring to lost some of their best players going into this season,
pointless article.
This whole
debate is
pointless.
It is
pointless to get into any further
debate about the stadium as there is no going back; although I understand that steps would seem necessary to improve the matchday experience for spectators.
I for one will not get into the Wenger in, Wenger out
debate as it is
pointless.
Debating «truth» is rather
pointless, but Wikipedia generally tends to be a well cited resource of information.
An ant researcher called the
debate «largely
pointless» — and urged better cooperation among those who study it.
We could have a long (and probably
pointless)
debate over just how that's measured, but one of their claims is that «our general air quality has increased», as «evidence» of which they present their Figure 3 - 3, showing a (slight!)
At that point, the only interest the movie has is
debating which is more frustrating: that David Loucka's screenplay abandons its already shaky psychological logic for a twist (twice if one counts the movie's
pointless coda) or that it lowers the characters» intelligence to the point that they all line up on at a time to fall victim to the horrors inside the titular house.
No I just mean, I don't want to say something in my write up on the trailer and have people starting some
pointless political / religious
debate because of that.
There was a time when
debating the greatest Marvel Cinematic Universe villain of all time before «Avengers: Infinity War's» theatrical debut would have seemed
pointless.
Yet, because we — and Doctor Strange — know the eventuality that is Thanos's success, these ethical
debates seem
pointless and shortsighted.
Considering the engine's triple whammy of improved performance, drivability and efficiency, splitting hairs over its origins becomes a
pointless existential
debate.
I'm not really going to enter the
debate about whether this is fair or not — because it's a
pointless one.
This is not true to begin with, so kind of
pointless to
debate.
Discussing a social issue with someone who blatantly denies the facts of the
debate is
pointless beyond attempting to educate the denier.
For the most part, these often - inflammatory
debates are nothing more than
pointless background noise akin to your next - door...
Sources at Square Enix USA have confirmed with Kotaku the reports from yesterday, which have settled a long - running - if ultimately
pointless -
debate amongst fans of the series.
This entire
debate is
pointless the game obviously isn't being released «early 2013 ″ so why continue to argue over it?
This
debate, just like the Bali
debate is
pointless because clearly events have overtaken us anyway.
But it does suggest that if both sides of the
debate paid close attention to the social consequences of policies, rather than the present intractable
debate on the reality of AGW, then we might get to a point where we can agree on some action — you might think it is
pointless with regard to the climate (but a substantial proportion of people think it will), but if it produces some other good outcomes it might be ok.
But it does suggest that if both sides of the
debate paid close attention to the social consequences of policies, rather than the present intractable
debate on the reality of AGW, then we might get to a point where we can agree on some action — you might think it is
pointless with regard to the climate (but a substantial proportion of people think it will), but if it produces some other good outcomes it might be OK.
If the observation that CO2 lags temperature by 800 years is accurate, then
debating short term variations of atmospheric CO2 when compared to short term temperature variations of that atmosphere seems
pointless.
But as ugly,
pointless and as unpleasant for those involved as it was, if there is something to be said about the character of the
debate about climate change, it is that raised passions and low tactics are not unique to either putative «side».