Sentences with phrase «no right to free speech»

The right to free speech simply means that when you attempt to speak (or write) no one may rightly take action to forcibly stop you from doing so.

While it speaks volumes that many Americans value their right to free speech, this does not mean that we have to pay for their vitriol.

The trolls would in turn invoke the First Amendment right to free speech — and, occasionally, they won the arguments.

Facebook, which got the case moved to San Francisco from Illinois, argued the users hadn't suffered a concrete injury such as physical harm, loss of money or property; or a denial of their right to free speech or religion.

«The Turkish government's news media shutdown shows how the State of Emergency law is being used to deny the right to free speech beyond any legitimate aim of upholding public order,» Human Rights Watch said in a statement.

He suggested that although the jurors might find the video, Gawker and Hogan's sex life distasteful, they must protect the First Amendment right to free speech.

«Kanye West has a right to free speech, and he has the right to spout lies and misinformation and misplaced opinions — but we as consumers have the right to fight back against this type of dangerous propaganda,» it read.

The right to free speech and the right to bear arms can be limited — even though both are constitutionally safeguarded.

The right to free speech and the right to privacy are basic human rights but large organisations and governments are increasing eroding these rights.

Too many people in the USA misunderstand the First Amendment's right to free speech.

I think what I'm getting at is this: Imagine 100 like - minded people (each with an obvious right to free speech) band together to speak on electoral politics.

If you ask them, I'm pretty sure that most liberal mainstream journalists are against punching conservatives who are peacefully exercising their rights to free speech - and they will probably mean what they say.

I agree with his right to free speech but he will never gain «converts» by being aggressive, insulting and condescending.

Where's the ACLU when their rights to free speech are being violated?

The issue is that free speech was provided for anti choice proponents, but an alternative plate giving the same right to free speech to pro choice proponents was voted down by the legislature.

Just like with Phil Robertson, matt has the right to free speech, but not freedom from consequences or people showing him the door

> I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.

When the U.S. Muslim community sounds out LOUD and CLEAR, without equivocation, and immediately against all forms of terrorism, including all aggressive religious intolerance for human rights, women's right, children, equal protection under the law, the respect for other religions to coexist, the right to free speech, and the ability to separate church from state, IF THEY FINALLY DO THAT AND LOUDLY, then we will begin to feel comfortable that they are truly embracing American ideals and here to join us, not to oppose, defy, or undermine what we hold dear.

So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak about there faith I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.

It's their right to free speech.

Thu - mping bible babble anywhere is part of our right to free speech guaranteed by the Const - itution.

I do think they should have the right to free speech and prayer is speech.

Besides, are you suggesting that we suppress anyone's right to free speech because if you are than you need to move to one of these bass ackward countries where a less than middle school quality production of a total farce can insight people to act as a pack of rabid dogs blaming America for why they live in dirt... We are LUCKY and BLESSED to live in a land where we can smile and walk away from an opinion that we disagree with... that South Park can but Jesus in a boxing ring against Satan and depict Moses as a glowing spinning dreidl... and these nutcases want to burn and pillage because one lunatic makes a childish and stupid play on videotape?

Americans will be to scared to exercise there right to free speech because today is the day we lost it america sleep well.

If I am to have a right to free speech, for example, then I must be empowered to speak and be heard, which means using the power of the state to give me the resources I need and to suppress anything that might disempower me.

We also agree today on many basic features of a democratic society: the right to vote, the right to due process of law, the right to free speech.

Although Wilders was completely out of line in his creation of that film and also in his comments, he still holds the right to free speech, which any laws against hate speech would be compromising.

Here in the US, we have the freedom of religion and the right to free speech (though people tend to be persecuted if they step too far away from «political correctness» these days.

People have the right to free speech in this country (supposedly), no matter how hateful, malinformed or uninformed.

Theocratic evangelical christians are scary and anti-American and would take away our rights to free speech and freedom of religion (or lack there of).

Once again, the right to free speech and freedom of expression is suspended when it comes to criticism of a certain Semitic ethnic group.

I support the Cathy family's right to free speech and morality.

Your right to free speech?

Christians get up in arms whenever anybody messes with the «rites» of baptism and the Lord's Supper, and we get up in arms whenever anybody messes with our legal «rights,» such as the right to free speech, the right to practice our religion, or the right to bear arms.

Hobbes dismantled the rights to free speech, association, and religious practice.

I fully support the KKK's right to free speech and to believe that gays and blacks are less than human.

Or, should conservative America rally around Eich's right to free speech, as they have around Dan Cathy and Phil Robertson, Firefox might surpass the other browsers and come out stronger than before.

We have rights to free speech just as you do and I, for one, am SICK TO DEATH of hearing just your side of things!

They too have a right to free speech.

Because we have the right to free speech here in the U.S. means that we should be and act responsibly with this right, otherwise... you might get someone killed.

The right to free speech covers both good and bad ideas.

Some of you may think that we are giving up our right to free speech by giving in to the extremists.

But that freedom is just one of many that we enjoy in the United States — and religious tolerance is no more, or less, valuable than are rights to free speech, to bear arms, to be free from search and seizure, to be presumed innocent until proven otherwise, to be tried by our peers, to have our day in court, to not be imprisoned or fined without cause, to ensure State's rights, to be free from slavery and involuntary servitude, and on, and on, and on.

Sure... they (Chik - fil - A have their rights to free speech.

But, they have they have a right to free speech without being shouted down.

F forcing them along these lines violates their right to free speech because it mandates a behavior, by the Greens, which they conscientiously object to.

Nobody is going to deny your right to free speech.

Also, keep in mind that the right to free speech is not an absolute right.

So, being a person of Faith you lose your right to free speech?

And I guess the line «Silverman acknowledges that the pair of new billboards will likely cause a stir» does not support my argument that this is an angry group of individuals who use their right to free speech to incite controversy.