Sentences with phrase «nominal growth»

Here are my findings: Investment A: 3.5 % initial yield with an 8 % per year nominal growth rate.

Investment B: 6.1 % initial yield with a 2 % per year nominal growth rate.

It is well known that when measuring economic change it is critical to adjust for inflation so that real growth is not confused with nominal growth in prices.

As you can see, there was nominal growth for both brick / mortar and online retailers.

In order to really impact style performance, they will need to boost nominal growth as well.

This will lead to even higher nominal growth, which is great for our debt problem.

Instead, faster nominal growth suggests more reliance on value stocks, which tends to perform best when growth is improving.

Bond yields are low because nominal growth is remarkably weak, not a great environment for corporate earnings.

In order to really impact style performance, they will need to boost nominal growth as well.

The reason: Typically investors place a smaller discount on value when growth is faster, particularly nominal growth.

If I were a betting man, I would wager that average nominal growth will be slightly lower than this, but not by much.

Currently the reported nominal growth in credit is around 12 %, and in fact is probably higher.

With that information ready at hand, economists can ascertain whether the economy is actually moving forward or whether nominal growth in the GDP is simply the result of inflation.

[And yes, that's real, not nominal growth..!

Your income stream will come within about 1 % of the initial dividend yield plus the annualized, nominal growth rate of the dividend minus the inflation rate.

Investment A: 3.5 % initial yield with an 8 % per year nominal growth rate.

Finally, higher nominal growth should translate into higher nominal interest rates, to the detriment of the so - called bond market proxies (equities that provide high dividends).

In addition, faster nominal growth is also associated with faster earnings growth.

The reason: Typically investors place a smaller discount on value when growth is faster, particularly nominal growth.

Simply put, one might believe that short - term interest rates will still be zero a decade from now, but if that's true, it will be because nominal growth over the intervening period has also been dismal.

Reflation is alive and well according to our definition: rising wages (albeit slowly this cycle) feeding stronger nominal growth, allowing lingering slack from the last recession to be gradually eliminated, stirring higher inflation over time.

We see reflation — rising nominal growth, wages and inflation — accelerating globally in 2017, led by the U.S..

While stocks have a terminal value beyond a 10 - year period, the effects of interest rates and nominal growth on those projections largely cancel out because higher nominal GDP growth over a given 10 - year horizon is correlated with both higher interest rates and generally lower market valuations at the end of that period.

And so while US potential GDP is projected to rise back toward something like 4 % in the coming years, post-recession nominal growth trends have been lackluster.

Because nominal growth equals real growth plus inflation, both nominal wage and NGDP targets implicitly account for inflation while also focusing on indicators more likely to promote the goal of full employment.

But we believe a moderate rise in the dollar is more likely, and the support for profit margins from better wages, spending and nominal growth reinforces our broadly positive view on risk assets and equities in particular.

It is in my opinion almost impossible that China would be able to improve its financial efficiency so dramatically without a significant slowdown in growth, but at least mechanically it is clear that if China were able to do so while maintaining nominal growth rates on average of 5 - 6 %, by the end of ten years China's debt to GDP ratio would be largely unchanged, although this would only happen after having risen to 235 % during the first five years.

Plus, structural trends — such as modest nominal growth, aging populations and low rates in Europe and Japan — should cap any rise in long - term U.S. yields.

During this period, a smoothed average of nominal growth explains almost 60 % of the variation in long - term rates (see the chart below).

Now, we're sympathetic to the idea that prospective real growth and inflation may be sufficiently lower in the future to place us into a low nominal growth world, which would also justify lower equilibrium interest rate levels.

The Fed will revive nominal growth after a year or two.

Only in the third quarters of 1958 and 1982 did the Fed shift when nominal growth was undershooting 4.5 percent and the latter action was even reversed a month later.

Abenomics Positive, But Not Final Japan appears to have exited the cycle of deflation and contraction in nominal growth since the launch of «Abenomics.»

Since 1950 (actually, since the 1940s), S&P 500 dividends have had a remarkably steady nominal growth rate of 5 % per year.

Why cross the Gross Domestic [GD] Product nominal growth with [GD] Purchases deflator?

From my viewpoint, this is due to an increase in expected nominal growth for the Gross World Product.

The GD Purchases deflator should correspond to the GD Purchases nominal growth rate.

The S&P 500 dividend nominal growth rate has been remarkably stable.

Here is a summary: Investment A: 3.5 % initial yield with an 8 % per year nominal growth rate.

As such they are forced to prioritise low interest rates and nominal growth over inflation control which could herald in the beginning of the end of the global fiat currency system that begun with the abandonment of Bretton Woods back in 1971.»

Reflation is alive and well according to our definition: rising wages (albeit slowly this cycle) feeding stronger nominal growth, allowing lingering slack from the last recession to be gradually eliminated, stirring higher inflation over time.

Regarding stock prices: money illusion affects stock prices because investors use a higher nominal discount rate to value stocks, but fail to project cash flow growth at the correspondingly higher nominal growth rate.

Although the low interest rate environment over the past decade has compressed bank NIMs, we expect U.S. - led reflation — rising nominal growth, wages and inflation — to accelerate.

In terms of the real economy, the simple answer is faster nominal growth.

According to Nielsen Bookscan, sales were up 1.65 % in the first quarter of 2015, but this can only be seen as nominal growth as the official inflation rate was pegged at 6.41 % last year, the market size actually decreased when compared to 2014.

Condition E: Investment A: 3.5 % initial yield with a 10 % per year nominal growth rate.