Sentences with phrase «nominal rate of»

Autofire — Allows holding down the primary weapon key / button for a nominal rate of fire.

Our cat suites are available at a nominal rate of $ 15 to $ 17.50 for 24 hours and canine suites at $ 20 to $ 24.50 for 24 hours.

So, a general rule of thumb is that if the nominal rate of the card is significantly higher than your other debts, pay it off first even if there is a 0 % introductory period.

What are you using for your predicted nominal rate of return for stocks / bonds and the rate of inflation?

Isn't the 80 year nominal rate of return nearly 10 %?

This method expresses the nominal rate of return in real terms, which keeps the purchasing power of a given level of capital constant over time.

In other words, even though the nominal rate of return on your savings is 5 percent, the real rate of return is only 2 percent, which means the real value of your savings only increases by 2 percent during a one - year period.

The real rate of return is the nominal rate of return minus the inflation rate.

The nominal rate of interest minus the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (i.e. the rate of inflation).

I believe a mid-single digit nominal rate of return over the next 5 - 10 years in the current interest rate environment would be a somewhat optimistic outlook for U.S. stock market returns.

The math calculation of RRSP and TFSA benefits ($ 1,165) equals the difference between the future values of the after tax savings ($ 3,500) compounded for 10 years, at the nominal rate of return (10 %) vs. at the after - tax rate of return (8.5 %).

«Tax Efficiency» (or the «Tax Haircut») measures «the difference between an asset's nominal rate of return and its after - tax rate of return» in a taxable account.

While the nominal rate of return reflects the investor's earnings as a percentage of his initial investment, the real rate takes inflation into account.

Second, it meant (and means) that investors are finally receiving at least a nominal rate of interest on their cash equivalents and short - term bond holdings going forward — a welcome change for patient value investors.

The nominal rate of return is the annual percentage return realized on an investment before being adjusted for inflation and taxes.

The nominal rate of return gives you an idea of how your money / investment is growing, while the Real Rate of Return tells you how much your purchasing power is growing.

You need to give importance to both nominal rate of return and real - rate of return.

The formula to calculate real return given nominal return is r = (1 + R) / (1 + i)- 1, where r = real rate of return, R = nominal rate of return, and i = inflation rate.

It is possible for real interest rates to be negative if the inflation rate exceeds the nominal rate of an investment.

nominal rate of... gross price discounting ban... dating export credit g...

Even if we agree that «doing nothing» means «doing nothing with the nominal rate of interest», that leaves open the question of how long the Bank holds the nominal rate of interest constant.

Despite some investors waxing rhapsodic about things like «mass collaboration and sharing enabled by technology and global communications networks,» S&P 500 Index revenues have grown at a nominal rate of just 3.2 % annually over the past 20 years, and just 1.6 % annually over the past decade, and that includes the benefit of stock buybacks.

Between 1967 and 2007, the US economy grew at an average nominal rate of 7.3 % per annum.

Not exact matches

If the Fed were to adopt an operating policy of achieving a steady rate of growth in nominal thin - air credit, it could return to its prior anonymity.

«A decrease in nominal GDP growth resulting solely from a one - year, 1 - percentage - point decrease in the rate of GDP inflation» reduces the budgetary balance by $ 1.9 billion.

Financial outlook assumes EUR / USD exchange rate of 1.15; nominal launch schedule and satellite health status and includes the impact of IFRS accounting changes.

(The Bank of Canada estimates that the nominal neutral interest rate, or the rate at which the level of interest is neither stimulative or contractionary, is between 2.75 % and 3.75 %, compared with 4.5 % and 5.5 % before the crisis.)

«The recent behavior of both nominal and real wages point to weaker labor market conditions than would be indicated by the current unemployment rate,» Yellen said in a speech to central bankers last week.

After accounting for the impacts of measures and adjustments, the Sales Tax revenue base is projected to grow at an average annual rate of 4.3 per cent over the forecast period, roughly consistent with the average annual growth in nominal consumption of 4.0 per cent over this period.

Real interest rates, which subtract inflation from the nominal rate to show the true cost of borrowing, soared as high as 8 % in the aftermath, as demand for goods and services evaporated and prices tumbled.

Finally, in a nominal GDP targeting regime, a decline in r - star caused by slower trend growth automatically leads to a higher rate of trend inflation, providing a larger buffer to respond to economic downturns.

Table 3 shows the changes in the average private sector economic forecasts for nominal GDP (the most applicable tax base for budgetary revenues), and for short - and long - term interest rates, from the first estimate of the deficit to the final outcome.

This occurs when the nominal interest rate is equal to the growth rate of nominal wages.

There is, of course, a great deal of skepticism about the 7 % real GDP growth rate that China has reported, but we should remember that in the first quarter, nominal GDP growth was much lower, 5.8 %.

Because nominal wage growth for a large fraction of workers has been held to zero, a somewhat higher rate of inflation would grease the wheels of the labor market by allowing real wages to fall (Akerlof, Dickens, and Perry 1996).

Since the average nominal wage rate has now risen to $ 21 an hour, the amount given back by the borrower is still equivalent to 1,000 hours of labour - time.

They include upwards revisions in economic forecasts, expectation of monetary tightening, rising real and nominal long - term interest rates, fiscal stimulus on a huge scale in a full employment economy, rising protectionism that should choke off import flows, and tax reform directed at reducing capital outflows and increasing capital inflows.

I use the term «forecast» somewhat loosely, since these are conditioned on a range of assumptions, such as a fixed nominal exchange rate and a particular path for the cash rate, and hence could better be described as «projections».

Low inflation and the impossibility of pushing nominal interest rates significantly below zero meant that there was little scope for lowering real interest rates and easing credit conditions by conventional means.

The only important thing a Neo-Wicksellian would add is that it's important to distinguish between nominal and real rates of interest (real = nominal minus inflation), so if we have a 2 % inflation target we add 2 % to the natural rate to get the «neutral» nominal rate.

Neither group of countries, in other words, could help us determine what a «normal» interest rate is compared to nominal GDP.

In this case the «cost» of financial repression to households was the gap between nominal GDP growth and nominal lending rates, plus an additional 1 - 1.5 % to account for the larger than normal gap between the lending rate and the deposit rate.

While stocks have a terminal value beyond a 10 - year period, the effects of interest rates and nominal growth on those projections largely cancel out because higher nominal GDP growth over a given 10 - year horizon is correlated with both higher interest rates and generally lower market valuations at the end of that period.

Most importantly, with nominal GDP growth rates having dropped from 20 % to 8 - 9 % the greatest of all the distortions, the interest rate distortion, has been the one most dramatically to adjust in the past three years.

First, it is now much harder for borrowers to justify investment in non-productive projects because they can no longer count on the huge gap between nominal GDP growth and the lending rate to bail them out of bad investments.

In the last year or so, however, the official lending rate has risen to 7.5 % and nominal GDP has dropped to 8 - 9 % (and just under 8 % in the first quarter of 2014).

The more appropriate measure of financial repression is not the deflator, whichever one we choose to use, but rather very roughly the gap between the nominal lending rate and the nominal GDP growth rate, the latter of which broadly represents the return on investment within the economy.

Well, we know that earnings, revenues, and nominal GDP have historically proceeded at a peak - to - peak growth rate of 6 % annually across economic cycles.

And that is a nominal rate; if, for example, a government were to take on excessive debt and inflate itself to regain solvency, real rates of return could easily be negative for equity holders.

But regardless of the debate, the point to remember is that when the nominal lending rate is much below the nominal GDP growth rate, two very important things happen.