Sentences with word «nominalization»

Maintain a high verb - to - noun ratio and avoid nominalizations.

Professor Sword also recommended that her readers check out her website — The Writer's Diet © — which she claims can give nascent writers an «operationalized assessment of [their]... propensity for nominalization dependence (translation: to diagnose your own zombie habits).»

In that post, Helen Sword, a professor at the University of Auckland, also called for eliminating nominalizations, which she affectionately labels Zombie Nouns:

Except for passive voice, the use of nominalizations (a / k / a buried verbs) is perhaps the best sign of poor legal writing.

Of course, it's common for non-lawyers to use nominalizations and related wordy phrases.

At their best, nominalizations help us express complex ideas: perception, intelligence, epistemology.

A paragraph heavily populated by nominalizations will send your readers straight to sleep.

They might even insert a few nominalizations for good measure.

So I decided to put the test to a test using excerpts from my eliminating - nominalizations post.

They can start by targeting two main enemies of efficient legal writing: buried verbs (aka nominalizations) and unnecessary prepositions.

Both results, though, were skewed toward the «Flabby» end of the scale because I needed to use the word nominalization multiple times in the samples because of the purpose of the post.

WordRake 3 converts hundreds of dull nominalizations to lively verbs («make a recommendation» becomes «recommend»), turns negative statements into positive statements («the auditor didn't find any discrepancies» becomes «the auditor found no discrepancies»), and removes windy «windups» («It should be stated that» and «Please note that»).

The heavy reliance on nominalizations and the verb «to be» sucks all the action from the story.

It will cross-out words, edit things you don't need or dull words, it will help you get rid of something that we call nominalizations, most lawyers have never even heard that word, but that's part of what makes our writing so dull sometimes is writing with nouns that could be verbs or WordRake will recognize a lot of those and brighten your writing, get rid of the clutter around them.

So why do legal writers use so many nominalizations containing - ion words?

Below, I discuss what nominalizations and buried verbs are, and how to eliminate them from your legal writing.

Garner's Modern American Usage defines nominalizations as «verbs that have been changed into nouns.»

In short, nominalizations wreck the clarity and concision of legal writing.

Here are 30 nominalizations taken from Garner's Legal Writing in Plain English, Garner on Language and Writing, and Garner's Advanced Legal Writing & Editing seminar textbook, and the action verbs you should replace them with:

In the third sentence, the active voice you can not store any items in your parking space is substituted for the passive voice / nominalization phrase the garage is not intended for storage of any items.

avoid nominalizations, turning a verb into a noun, use the word conclude rather than they draw conclusions;

Recently, I recommended how to eliminate nominalizations and buried verbs from your legal writing.

Nominalizations and buried verbs are a huge problem in legal writing.

Avoiding nominalizations are one way you can allow the reader to quickly digest your story.

Nominalizations are a tried and true way to make one sound smart.

Avoid nominalizations, which are nouns formed from other parts of speech, i.e., where form becomes «formation;» «indicate» becomes «indication,» and «object» becomes «objection.

Let's remove the nominalizations, wordy phrases, and passive voice:

In the second sentence, To prepare to clean it is substituted for the nominalization in preparation for our freshen - up (is freshen - up even a word?).

Striking the nominalization in accordance with, and changing the passive voice smoking is prohibited to active voice, we get: «The Minnesota Clean Air Act prohibits smoking.»