In a statement, Martin Amidu said: «Instead of rushing to disqualify them [the aspirants] contrary to the due process of law (particularly the right to alter or amend as provided by law and natural justice) and gloating on her competence in the unlawful application of C.I. 94 she should have resigned for failing in her functions to educate the aspirants for the complex
nomination electoral process and its purpose.»
Instead of rushing to disqualify them contrary to the due process of law (particularly the right to alter or amend as provided by law and natural justice) and gloating on her competence in the unlawful application of C.I. 94 she should have resigned for failing in her functions to educate the aspirants for the complex
nomination electoral process and its purpose.
«Instead of rushing to disqualify them [the aspirants] contrary to the due process of law (particularly the right to alter or amend as provided by law and natural justice) and gloating on her competence in the unlawful application of C.I. 94 she should have resigned for failing in her functions to educate the aspirants for the complex
nomination electoral process and its purpose.»
Not exact matches
According to the Director of Chatham House, Dr. Robin Niblett CMG, the
nomination of Charlotte Osei was also based on her admirable supervision of Ghana's peaceful and transparent
electoral process in December 2016.
Students also experience the
electoral process through a complete sequence of
electoral activities including candidate
nominations, party platforms, campaign speeches, how to vote cards, a mock - election (including printed ballot papers) and a preferential vote count.