There is currently a federal law against
non-citizens voting in an election for a federal office (president / vice president, senator, or representative), but there is no federal law against non-citizens voting in any other state or local election.
In fact, several cities and towns in Maryland currently allow non-citizens to vote in local elections, and, historically, over 40 states or territories have, at some point in the past, allowed
non-citizen voting in some elections.
So maybe you are asking what if California hypothetically allows
non-citizen voting in all elections that it runs, including those for president / vice president, senator, and representative.
Not exact matches
The authors of that study have downplayed its findings, saying that while «we stand by our finding that some
non-citizens have
voted in recent
elections,» the study's findings about noncitizen
voting had been exaggerated and misrepresented.
Subsequently, another peer - reviewed article argued that the findings reported
in this post (and affiliated article) were biased and that the authors» data do not provide evidence of
non-citizen voting in U.S.
elections.»
Or whether you're
voting in all
elections, or a
non-citizen voting only
in BoE
elections under new law.
A few places
in America allow
non-citizens to
vote in local
elections, these citizens also enjoy an effective «plural
vote» if they can
vote overseas
in elections in their home countries.
However, given lax proof requirements at registration, and even laxer requirements of identity proof at the time of
voting, the results of every local / regional
election in areas highly populated by
non-citizens is
in doubt.
There would presumably be no legal problem if California were to hypothetically allow
non-citizens to
vote in all
elections except those for federal offices.
As another aside, I don't think CA even checks citizenship even if it could - because legal
non-citizen are eligible to
vote in local
elections in CA as far as I know, so they are actually permitted to register to
vote.
@JonathanReez To be clear, I specifically said that significant
non-citizen voting could plausibly impact
election outcomes
in Florida if it took place at a high rate
in the very last paragraph, even though it is very unlikely to have an impact anywhere else.
The Green Party has long supported allowing
non-citizens to
vote in local
elections.
NYC Council President Melissa Mark - Viverito wants to grant
voting rights to
non-citizens — including, perhaps, illegal immigrants —
in all municipal
elections.
Mark - Viverito wants to grant
voting rights to
non-citizens — including, perhaps, illegal immigrants —
in all municipal
elections.
This legislation, «Voting By
Non-Citizen Residents,» would allow immigrants who are «lawfully present
in the United States» and have lived
in New York for «six months or longer» on the date of a given
election to
vote provided they meet all the other current requirements for voter registration
in New York State.
The proposal, which would allow certain
non-citizens to
vote in local
elections, appears to have a veto - proof majority
in the New York City Council — enough to overcome opposition by Mayor Michael Bloomberg.
The mayor - elect, this source speculated, may be reluctant to step
in because a Mark - Viverito speakership would immediately confront him with issues such as
non-citizen voting in municipal
elections, a question he is not interested
in taking up at the outset of his administration.
Queens Councilman Mark Weprin, often characterized
in the media as one of the more «moderate» contenders, repeatedly noted that his mother is Cuban, his district is teeming with minorities and that he supports
non-citizen immigrants
voting in municipal
elections as well as reforms to stop - and - frisk.
While they are afforded many of the same benefits and protections as citizens,
non-citizen nationals are not able to
vote in federal
elections, such as the presidential
election.
Similar to
non-citizen nationals, permanent residents are not able to
vote in the presidential
election.