Sentences with phrase «non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts»

By entering the Awards, you agree to submit to the laws of New South Wales and you submit to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of that place and the courts of appeal from them.

The Trustee and the Sponsor both consent to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York and the federal courts located in the borough of Manhattan in New York City.

These Terms of Use are governed by the law in force in the State of Iowa, United States, and the parties irrevocably submit to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of Iowa and courts of appeal from them for determining any dispute concerning the Terms of Use.

Each party irrevocably and unconditionally submits to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of New South Wales to determine any dispute arising out of these Terms of Use.

The parties shall submit before the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in Israel.

Not exact matches

The parties agree that the state or federal courts in New York shall have non-exclusive jurisdiction of any Section 27 Dispute.

The terms set out in these pages shall be governed, construed and in accordance with, laws of the Republic of Ireland and the user irrevocably agrees that the Courts of the Republic of Ireland are to have non-exclusive jurisdiction to settle any disputes that may arise out of or in connection with these terms.

17.6 These terms and conditions and your use of our website and Service are governed by English law and you submit to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts.

These Terms will be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of District of Columbia, and you submit to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in District of Columbia for the resolution of any disputes.

These Terms will be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and you submit to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in California for the resolution of any disputes.

The terms and conditions of use of this Website shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and the English courts shall have non-exclusive jurisdiction over any dispute relating to these terms and conditions or the use of this Website.

In joining the Programme, you are agreeing to submit to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the English Courts in relation to any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with the Programme, these Flying Club Terms, their subject matter or their formation (including non-contractual disputes or claims).

British Airways and AGL and all Members who do not reside in the USA or Canada submit to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts to resolve any disputes that may arise out of them.

12.2 The courts of England shall have the non-exclusive jurisdiction to settle any dispute that may arise out of, under, or in connection with these Terms or the legal relationship established by them.

We both agree that the courts of England and Wales will have non-exclusive jurisdiction.

You and we both agree to that the courts of England and Wales will have non-exclusive jurisdiction.

You agree that any action arising under these Terms of Use & Disclaimer shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of Singapore courts.

By accessing this Site and providing information requested, you submit to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the Singapore courts.

62 «Taking an AXA to Acts of the Scottish Parliament» [2010] 15 J.R. 163 «Towards a Codified Constitution» (2010) Justice Journal 74 (co-author) «Procuring the End of the Promptness Requirement» [2010] 29 C.J.Q. 297 «Practice and Procedure in the New Supreme Court» [2010] 15 J.R. 1 «Anti-Suit Injunctions and Non-Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses» [2010] 69 C.L.J. 25 «Contracting Out of Homelessness Functions» [2009] 14 J.R. 333 «The Permission Stage and Subsequent Use of Disclosed Material» [2009] 14 J.R. 249 «Arbitration and Litigation after West Tankers» [2009] L.M.C.L.Q. 285 «Bi-Polar Sovereignty Restated» [2009] 68 C.L.J. 361 «Promptness and Judicial Review» [2009] 14 J.R. 113 «A Framework for Fettering» [2009] 14 J.R. 73 «The Continued Rise (and Future Fall?)

Similarly, they can call for disputes to be under the non-exclusive jurisdiction of US courts - if an action was brought in an Australian court the court would probably decide that they do not have jurisdiction and tell the plaintiff to take their case to the US.

The IMA contained a non-exclusive jurisdiction agreement in favour of the English courts.

That includes English jurisdiction on the basis of non-exclusive choice of court, covered by Article 25 of the Recast Regulation.