Thus we would argue for the classical Christian doctrine of
the non-physical human soul, inter-defined with the human body.
Not exact matches
The words are at best a very rough translation and they convey a sense which is in tension with Church Tradition concerning the uniquely spiritual (
non-physical)
human soul.
But if we can no longer accept the reality of a disembodied
human soul, then what does it mean to attribute consciousness, thinking powers, will and emotions to a
non-physical bodiless being, however greatly exalted?
In a society where the «magnificent» discovery of and «obedience to the truth» of the physical realm is so influential it is crucial that we have the means to interpret it non-reductively and in such a manner that it points to the
non-physical, spiritual realities of divine and
human mind, thatis God and the
soul.