Sentences with phrase «noncustodial parent in the case»

Not exact matches

In cases where a noncustodial parent is claiming a dependency exemption, the noncustodial parent must file Form 8332 or its equivalent.

(A) when a court orders sole custody to one parent, the custodial parent, except in cases of abuse, neglect, or abandonment, should facilitate opportunities for reasonable telephonic and electronic communication between the minor child and the noncustodial parent, as appropriate, as provided for by court order if the court determines that this type of communication is in the best interest of the child; and (B) when a court orders joint custody to both parents, each parent should facilitate opportunities for reasonable telephonic and electronic communication between the minor child and the other parent, as appropriate, as provided for by court order if the court determines that this type of communication is in the best interest of the child.

In Franklin, Spring Hill, Columbia, Murfreesboro, Lawrenceburg, and Pulaski, we see frequent cases of a custodial parent blocking the noncustodial parent's access to their children.

In evaluating the best interests of a child in determining custody in the case of a proposed relocation of one parent, the trial court may appropriately consider several factors including: the advantages of the relocation in terms of its capacity to improve the life of the child; the motives of the custodial parent in seeking the move; the likelihood that the custodial parent will comply with visitation orders when he or she is no longer subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of North Carolina; the integrity of the noncustodial parent in resisting the relocation; and the likelihood that a realistic visitation schedule can be arranged which will preserve and foster the parental relationship with the noncustodial parenIn evaluating the best interests of a child in determining custody in the case of a proposed relocation of one parent, the trial court may appropriately consider several factors including: the advantages of the relocation in terms of its capacity to improve the life of the child; the motives of the custodial parent in seeking the move; the likelihood that the custodial parent will comply with visitation orders when he or she is no longer subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of North Carolina; the integrity of the noncustodial parent in resisting the relocation; and the likelihood that a realistic visitation schedule can be arranged which will preserve and foster the parental relationship with the noncustodial parenin determining custody in the case of a proposed relocation of one parent, the trial court may appropriately consider several factors including: the advantages of the relocation in terms of its capacity to improve the life of the child; the motives of the custodial parent in seeking the move; the likelihood that the custodial parent will comply with visitation orders when he or she is no longer subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of North Carolina; the integrity of the noncustodial parent in resisting the relocation; and the likelihood that a realistic visitation schedule can be arranged which will preserve and foster the parental relationship with the noncustodial parenin the case of a proposed relocation of one parent, the trial court may appropriately consider several factors including: the advantages of the relocation in terms of its capacity to improve the life of the child; the motives of the custodial parent in seeking the move; the likelihood that the custodial parent will comply with visitation orders when he or she is no longer subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of North Carolina; the integrity of the noncustodial parent in resisting the relocation; and the likelihood that a realistic visitation schedule can be arranged which will preserve and foster the parental relationship with the noncustodial parenin terms of its capacity to improve the life of the child; the motives of the custodial parent in seeking the move; the likelihood that the custodial parent will comply with visitation orders when he or she is no longer subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of North Carolina; the integrity of the noncustodial parent in resisting the relocation; and the likelihood that a realistic visitation schedule can be arranged which will preserve and foster the parental relationship with the noncustodial parenin seeking the move; the likelihood that the custodial parent will comply with visitation orders when he or she is no longer subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of North Carolina; the integrity of the noncustodial parent in resisting the relocation; and the likelihood that a realistic visitation schedule can be arranged which will preserve and foster the parental relationship with the noncustodial parenin resisting the relocation; and the likelihood that a realistic visitation schedule can be arranged which will preserve and foster the parental relationship with the noncustodial parent.

In these cases, the court may choose to base child support on the noncustodial parent's potential income rather than his or her actual income.

In the case of custody, the parents must agree on four key points: legal custody (who makes decisions about the child); physical custody (where he or she lives); visitation (how often and under what conditions the noncustodial parent spends time with him or her); and child support (the noncustodial parent's contribution to the costs of raising the child).

The noncustodial parent, however, has the right to challenge the custody arrangement in the case of a relocation.

In most cases, the noncustodial parent is still granted visitation time.

However, in extreme cases of neglect, abuse or addiction, a judge may remove the noncustodial parent's visitation rights.

It is important for both parents to understand that, except in rare cases, a noncustodial parent tends to always have some rights with regard to his child.

In a relocation case the noncustodial parent seeking to restrain the custodial parent from moving must meet a heavy burden to show that circumstances justify reopening the question of custody.

In any event, the statement is dictum, since the case turned on the corollary rule that modification of custody may be ordered when the custodial parent has moved for the purpose of frustrating contact between the child and the noncustodial parent.

Illinois» Fathers for New Futures (FNF) hosts the Power of Fathers Symposium, a statewide collaborative of nonprofits that seeks to strengthen and support low - income minority fathers in developing relationships with their children, families, and communities.77 Among its programs, FNF provides job readiness training, parent education, case management, child support information, and additional services to young fathers and men trying to reconnect with their families.78 FNF also hosts a working group of practitioners, and research and policy experts that supports outcomes for children of noncustodial, African - American fathers.79

In the vast majority of cases, when custody is contested, courts award physical (or primary) custody to the mother, who becomes the custodial parent, and visitation rights («parenting time») to the father, who is the noncustodial parent and who also pays child support.

The noncustodial parent can not claim the credit because even in the case of divorced or separated parents the household must actually be the principal place of abode of the taxpayer / claimer and child.

Through the University of Louisville Research Foundation, Inc., in Louisville, KY, Stepping Up 4 Your Child provides noncustodial fathers with a comprehensive, solution - oriented program featuring group - based parent education and individualized case management to help fathers achieve financial independence, increase their parenting skills, and develop a co-parenting alliance.

Utah lawmakers took a step Wednesday toward establishing another option for courts in divorce cases that would give noncustodial parents who meet certain criteria more time with their children.

SALT LAKE CITY — Utah lawmakers took a step Wednesday toward establishing another option for courts in divorce cases that would give noncustodial parents who meet certain criteria more time with their children.

While there are formulas within the statute for determining support in these cases, the only requirement that stands when joint physical custody is roughly equal is that the standard of living of the child should not be less than that of the noncustodial parent.

In most cases, a custodial parent is not allowed to move the children out of state without the approval of the noncustodial parent.

In this case, the noncustodial parent gets to pick the weekend he or she wants, as long as he or she gives the other parent at least 14 days» written or telephonic notice.