As all Biblical scholars know,
none of the Books of the New Testament were written by Jesus or anyone who ever met Jesus.
But seriously, using your argument and the fact that
none of the books of the new testament were written when Jaaaayzis was alive... none of the new testament is a «true Christian'testament.
Not exact matches
None of them, unfortunately, come from reading
books or articles such as this one, but it's certainly a good start.
Davidow, Theodore Levitt, Regis McKenna —
none of these innovators who literally wrote the
book on marketing had MBAs.
While these mini Mensa types skimmed their psychology
books and hit Georgetown's popular hangout the Tombs promptly at 4 p.m., I memorized, was tutored and had every conceivable study buddy willing to take even a little pity on me and
none of it happened over a beer.
Giving a new college graduate an 832 - page
book by a professor sounds like a terrible idea — except your gift will probably register when you say it's on the recommendation
of none other than Microsoft cofounder and billionaire philanthropist Bill Gates.
Creative chaos It was in the 1883 novel Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A
Book for All and
None, that Nietzsche, in advancing his concept
of the ubermensch, writes, «I tell you: One must still have chaos in oneself, to give birth to a dancing star.»
And
none of this is to say that
book publishing can't change again — ever shifting to the needs
of entrepreneurs and the marketplace
of ideas they join.
None of the
books featured here will give you easy answers to hard questions.
To sort through the empirical evidence, as happened in the course
of my writing the
book, is to find many reasons for concern over secularization — including, for starters, the unhappy fact that the rise
of «
nones» will reduce charitable donations to good causes.
This gets into philosophy -
of - law issues,
of course, but even some imaginable judicially restrained economic - autonomy - is - Locke's - teaching scholars (i.e., really
none of the libertarian con - law scholars I know
of) would be advocating a way
of life, and a pattern
of regular legislation, that centered one's practice
of liberty upon, well, business - man, or to speak Republic
book VIII, oligarchic - man, accomplishments.
Second, the
Book of Mormon contains
none of the key Mormon doctrines.
In other words, between two
of the most prominent ex-gay
books of the 1990s, you got about a couple
of blog posts worth
of discussion
of celibacy, almost
none of it directed to practical problems celibates face.
Indeed,
none of the supernaturalist historians discussed in this
book survive Martin's criticisms in this regard.
What was sought by all critics, but grasped by
none, was «the general intention» behind all
of Vereker's
books, their unifying meaning.
No matter title, conference presence, friendship,
book credits, phone or email records... etc,
none of that makes them Tony Jones or answerable to his sins in anyway.
Atheists have written numerous
books, virtually all
of which acknowledge countless god concepts, while pointing out that
NONE of them has the slightest evidence in their favor.
I hope this
book will help people
of other religions and
none to appreciate Christianity.
The Good
Book says
of mosques in general, «He only shall tend Allah's sanctuaries who believeth in Allah and the Last Day and observeth proper worship and payeth the poor - due and feareth
none save Allah.
I have
books on my shelves written by Muslims and Mormons,
none of which I have thrown out.
So, here we are believing whatever story there is in a «holy
book» written based on the account
of one person that
none of us knew, but had an apparition in the middle
of the night to get to do something.
I fail to see how going to catholicism suddenly makes his fairy tale
book based on no facts suddenly true... oh wait more hypocrisy on the playground because religions cant stand the fact that
none of them could be right, or that theirs might not be better than their neighbors.
More importantly,
none of the topics discussed in the pope's
book are doctrinal in nature; they are all part
of secular mythos that have grown up around Christmas.
Consider further that the
Book of Life, as it applies to unbelievers, is a record
of those who have offered perfect obedience before God and are thus worthy
of eternal life when they are judged by God on the basis
of their works at the White Throne Judgment (Romans 2:6 - 16, Romans 10:4, Galatians 3:10 - 12, Revelations 20:11 - 15),
none of whose names will actually be found in the
Book of Life and will therefore be condemned (Matthew 19:16 - 22).
His
book How to Reach Secular People is good, as is James Emery White's
book called The Rise
of the
Nones: Understanding and Reaching the Religiously Unaffiliated.
Your eyes did see my unformed substance; And in your
book they were all written, Even the days that were ordained for me, When as yet there was
none of them.
None of these have any connection with man made
books from thousands
of years ago that apparently describe the origin
of life.
I think if these people had worried less about what others might be sharing, and just stayed focused on getting their own
book done, maybe we'd be talking about how great their
book is because it would be published, rather than all the lives they destroyed in trying to control others and make sure
none of their ideas leaked out.
Other reports have nitpicked details
of the story, most
of which are addressed in the
book and
none of which detract from her mother's telling
of the life and death
of Cassie Bernall.
But
none of those was entitled, on account
of being acquainted with
books, to any special social privileges.
creationism is far from an adult theory, its a child like story with fantasy elements based on myth and NO science, we always hear about these crazy people trying to outlaw evolution.But has you stated we have billions
of years
of evidence, thanks for helping us evolutionists out, unfortunately you have
none, just a
book, no science, no artifacts, no garden
of eden, no bones
of adam or eve or even the snake for that matter, no ark, no proof
of a biblical flood, no proof
of a created world by a higher power, no nothing..
I use the word limitations rather than mistakes, for
none of the biographer's statements seems to me false.2 What I miss in the
book is awareness
of some intellectual advances during the century or more between the end
of Darwin's career and the publication
of this biography.
His
book is an extraordinarily instructive examination
of how these patterns unfold in both Scripture and tradition, where all three» often intertwined» operate as the «most appropriate ways»
of naming the Trinity,
none of which makes the others unnecessary.
Yet
none of the voices from the journalistic and political establishments dared criticize Imus because he sells their
books big time.
All
of the advances that you sight are a direct result
of scientific inquiry,
none were made by referencing a
book written by bronze age middle eastern shepards
Your
book is not viewed as being historical at all, since nearly
none of it can be confirmed.
So we come back to what was said at the beginning
of this
book — that
of all the many things the world now needs,
none is more needed than an upsurge
of vital, God - centered, intelligently - grounded prayer.
If you have dreams for what you are going to do for God, and how your ministry will grow, and what
books you will write, and how many children you will rescue, and how churches will beat down your door to ask you to come speak for them, the chances are pretty good that if you are following Jesus,
none of this will happen and instead, He will lead you into obscurity, poverty, nakedness, danger, and sword (Rom 8:35).
«You formed my inmost parts,» the Psalmist prays, «you knitted me together in my mother's womb... Your eyes saw my unformed substance; in your
book were written, every one
of them, the days that were formed for me, when as yet there was
none of them» (Psalm 139:13, 16).
The following is a list
of atheist
books of moral teachings...
none, zilch, nada, zippo, vaporware.
He gives only slight attention to textual problems, so that the commentary has
none of the marks
of the older, forbidding commentaries that have the feel
of a phone
book.
Its three most important figures — John Muir, Aldo Leopold, and Rachel Carson — were all deeply influenced by the
Book of Nature and the
Book of Books, but
none fully embraced the King
of Kings.Muir was the product
of a strict Campbellite home where he learned most
of the Bible «by heart and by sore flesh.»
None the less, any
book — indeed, as I shall be arguing, all knowledge - reflects the outlook and standpoint
of the author.
We're talking about discipline (or the lack
of it), church today, new friend debriefings, the
book I'm writing, the school he's trying to finish (still) and how frustrating it is to work and work and still feel like you're just barely making ends meet because I do a lot
of things really well but unfortunately,
none of them make us much money.
The
Book of Mormon states: «He (God) inviteth them all to come unto him... and he denieth
none that come to him, black and white, bond and free, male and female; and he remembereth the heathen; and all are alike unto God, both Jew and Gentile.»
(Disclaimer:
None of these artists are «partners» with the
book or anything.
We must accept it as a whole or
none at all because if the
book or collection
of books which I would rather say the Bible is wrong in geology then what good is its theology?
There are numerous cultural and sociological reasons for this,
none of which I intend to delve into (see this
book for some help).
I think it's very easy to forget that the Bible is a
book written for human beings,
none of whom are exactly the same in circumstance, journey, thought or understanding.
In fact, if nothing in the Second
Book of Kings had taken place, if
none of the decisions
of these men had been made, little would have changed.