At 6 weeks, only 52 % of the puppies were protected, meaning that half of the puppies vaccinated at 6 weeks of age would get all of the risk from the vaccine and
none of the benefit because their maternal antibodies inactivated the vaccine.
Not exact matches
The values
of these personal
benefits are based on the incremental aggregate cost to our company and are not individually quantified
because none of them individually exceed the greater
of $ 25,000 or 10 percent
of the total amount
of perquisites and personal
benefits for such NEO.
You seem to have highlighted particular sins as though some are worse than others all sin leads to death not just the big ones
because we all are sinners.All have gone astray
none are righteous.I believe the worst sin is pride idolatry is the first commandment we set ourselves as Gods.Regardless
of what the sin is, our hearts are condemned by our pride.It wasnt the sin
of homosexuality or sexual deviance that destroyed sodom.It was there pride and it is one
of our biggest stumbling blocks in our christian walk or it certainly was for me.We look at the story
of the adulterous woman and we think adultery is a terrible crime but the story is for our
benefit to show that we all are sinners that Jesus does nt condemn us but came to save us.And when Jesus says go and sin no more he was not only talking to the woman but everyone else that was around judging her for her sin its a universal message that we all need to see that we all are condemned
because of our sin that Jesus came to save us and that we turn from our sin and follow him.
Because he is the way the truth and the life.brentnz
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety
of reasons, most importantly
because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style
of play has become a shadow
of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out
of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid
of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out
of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes
of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play
of Monreal, but
none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio
of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger
because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part
of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part
of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature
of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player
of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out
of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front
of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that,
of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one
of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one
of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already
of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs
of the original Wenger offensive model
because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack
of mobility is an albatross around the necks
of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue
because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic
because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the
benefits
Because while each
of the practices — home birth, breastfeeding, and co-sleeping — has its
benefits,
none of them is related to a baby's secure attachment with her caregiver, nor are they predictive
of a baby's mental health and development.
Because none of the subjects had actual experience with Bill Clinton, imagining him did not
benefit from such memories, though many could picture the environs in which he would find himself.
Thus, vegetarians, or people that eat
none of these foods, must add supplements to prevent deficiency, while athletes
benefit from supplements
because of their greater needs.
Couldn't really taste anything
because of the other ingredients, but I was happy to have the health
benefits none - the-less I need to sneak tumeric into my foods more often.
None of the publishers wanted to do that
because they'd lose the
benefit of the buzz surrounding a new release, and the practice invited piracy.
Because in the end, unlike a joint loan or credit card, your cosigner is assuming all
of the risk with
none of the
benefits.
And
none of our prescription diets fell under that which was a shame
because there were cases that really could have
benefited and others who pulled their pets off the rx diet thinking they were harming their pets.
None of these provide hugely tangible
benefits on the track, but that's
because upgrades in real - life F1 don't tend to suddenly swing the balance
of power, rather improvements are subtle, gaining the team a few extra tenths
of a second here or there.
None of these will truly
benefit the world,
because economic growth doesn't exist when a product is manufactured by force, and people are forced to buy that product.
While it is no perfect solution either (and there probably is
none), the Advocate General's solution
of doing exactly the same thing the other way round — offering the action for damages as consolation for the party that has previously
benefitted from an erroneous transformation
of EU law by the Member State and now pays the price
because of horizontal direct effect excluding the application
of a norm
of national law they had relied on — has at least a somewhat more equilibrated approach towards sharing the burden
of advantages and disadvantages.
None of these are very good, even though they are active,
because they don't sell your future employer on what you are able to do, or what
benefits you are able to bring to their team.
Because while each
of the practices — home birth, breastfeeding, and co-sleeping — has its
benefits,
none of them is related to a baby's secure attachment with her caregiver, nor are they predictive
of a baby's mental health and development.
In return, he got half
of the property's equity, half
of the rents, half
of the tax
benefits and most importantly,
because I agreed to continue managing the tenants, he got
none of the landlording headaches.