Sentences with phrase «none of the benefits of»

So Bitcoin gets none of the benefits of being a currency in the state of New Jersey, but all of the downside of being «legal tender».

Barrier contraceptives interfere with this hormonal exchange and the woman would receive none of the benefits of this intimacy.

However, he told the Financial Times that this «has always been the case» - and noted that the health service would have been spending about # 1 billion on old systems anyway, which provided none of the benefits of the new scheme.

Nearly half of men, however, responded that none of the benefits of being single outweigh their wish to find someone special.

So, in effect, value and income sectors enjoyed none of the benefits of the January rally, yet still took a beating along with the broader market in February and March.

It has absolutely none of the benefits of a regular bike, spitting out 140 decibels of noise and consuming a lot of kerosene, but goes like a bat out of hell.

Not exact matches

«None of those benefits will come to light.»

Trying to go public during the financial crisis was like being a public company without any of the benefits of being public: briefing analysts on a quarterly basis, reporting financials — all the encumbrances of public company but none of the financial benefit.

All of the benefits of its Rockstar papa, none of the ridicule.

Even the fact that you were born at this time in history, that you were given a brain and a heart that you didn't have to earn, and that you get to benefit from the awesome power of modern technologies like the Internet — none of this was within your control, nor did you create these gifts.

Though BCE claimed it desperately needed the deal for its Bell Media division to compete in an ever - changing and increasingly international market (not to mention to bulk up its presence in Quebec), and altruistically promised to undertake a variety of tangible benefits for the greater good of Canadian society, Blais was having none of it.

He also explained that WTFs «combine the benefits of capitalism and socialism with none of the downsides.»

The values of these personal benefits are based on the incremental aggregate cost to our company and are not individually quantified because none of them individually exceed the greater of $ 25,000 or 10 percent of the total amount of perquisites and personal benefits for such NEO.

Some may argue this comparison is too simplistic and «apples to oranges» but the annual terawatt hour consumption figures persist none the less, and Bitcoin costs roughly 10x more energy than CERN Meanwhile, most, if not all of us will probably find it very difficult to demonstrate a cost / utility argument in support of Bitcoin having 10x more benefit than CERN.

To people who haven't tried and don't get taking cold showers (or other punishing task like running a marathon you know you won't win, climbing Mount Everest after others already have, meditating, or practicing yoga — none of which create results beyond you dong something challenging and the personal benefit that comes with it) today's post might help them understand.

Each brand is worth researching but none offer all the combined benefits of bitcoin and the Ethereum Network.

In effect, they give us the benefit of debt - an ability to have more assets working for us - but saddle us with none of its drawbacks.»

So none of us get the benefit of his thinking any more.

None of this is to say that raising money from professional investors is without its benefits.

The SALT deduction is regressive since one - third of the benefit of the deduction goes to the top 1 percent of earners and virtually none goes to the bottom half.

The wink and the nudge, the giving of the benefit of the doubt, the charitable looking the other way — none of these can be tolerated any longer.

You seem to have highlighted particular sins as though some are worse than others all sin leads to death not just the big ones because we all are sinners.All have gone astray none are righteous.I believe the worst sin is pride idolatry is the first commandment we set ourselves as Gods.Regardless of what the sin is, our hearts are condemned by our pride.It wasnt the sin of homosexuality or sexual deviance that destroyed sodom.It was there pride and it is one of our biggest stumbling blocks in our christian walk or it certainly was for me.We look at the story of the adulterous woman and we think adultery is a terrible crime but the story is for our benefit to show that we all are sinners that Jesus does nt condemn us but came to save us.And when Jesus says go and sin no more he was not only talking to the woman but everyone else that was around judging her for her sin its a universal message that we all need to see that we all are condemned because of our sin that Jesus came to save us and that we turn from our sin and follow him.Because he is the way the truth and the life.brentnz

No soul benefits except from its own works, and none bears the burden of another.

There are many benefits and disadvantages to belonging to a tribe, but the Jesus tribes incorporates all the benefits but none of the disadvantages.

While home prices were rising rapidly over the past fifteen years, ballooning the net worth of millions of homeowners, none of those who benefited complained.

Their argument ignores the common practice of imposing environmental risks on one group (usually poorer, less powerful, and often rural) for the benefit of others who suffer none of the environmental risks.

There isn't, David argues, any evidence for the governor's claims about the benefits of gambling, and the governor himself presents none, and a great deal of evidence against it.

If our church was really looking to get rich, we would not be helping others despite the fact that we are in debt, some of our paid staff does not currently have benefits, and none of the staff has had a pay increase in over 5 years.

None of these have shown potent weight loss benefits.

Some researches showed that this little berry provides anti-aging benefits, helps your immune system to operate more efficiently and can even destroy cancer cells while boosting your energy levels, even if none of these studies have scientific confirmation to date.

I opt for raw coconut butter for the fat, with a host of health benefits and none of the nut allergies.

All chocolate lovers want to hear are the benefits and none of the guilt.

If you want all the benefits of fiber with none of the negatives, your only choice is Sunfiber.

im guessing that means none of the nutritional benefits are received.

Some words of wisdom grace the walls with none other than Albert Einstein's famous quote,» Nothing will benefit human health and increase the chances for survival of life on earth as much as the evolution to a vegetarian diet.»

This would give you all of the above - mentioned benefits of whey protein, with none of the unwanted effects of additives.

For $ 3.99 a shot, Youthy Forever delivers the first ever non-alcoholic Resveratrol drink, packed with a whopping 70 mg of Resveratrol, the amount you'd get in 60 glasses of red wine, with all of the benefits and none of the headache.

Bursting with plump blueberries and made with your favourite protein powder, fibre - rich flax meal, oatmeal and coconut flour, these bars have none of the junk of store bought bars and all of the benefits of a convenient on - the - go protein snack.

It's best to buy organic tomatoes, as these will provide you with all of the benefits, and none of the drawbacks associated with conventionally grown tomatoes.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

AskDrSears has a balanced (in my opinion) look at the pros and cons of circumcision — http://askdrsears.com/html/1/t012000.asp — It's quite lengthy, but specifically worth noting is: «Medical benefits — THERE ARE NONE!

Because while each of the practices — home birth, breastfeeding, and co-sleeping — has its benefits, none of them is related to a baby's secure attachment with her caregiver, nor are they predictive of a baby's mental health and development.

With the Mom Care Baby Wrap, you and your newborn or younger baby will be able to enjoy all the great benefits of babywearing with none of the concerns.

None of the studies on DHA and ARA supplemented foods showed such a large benefit.

Interventions to improve breastfeeding initiation, exclusivity and duration are based on extensive evidence from both observational and intervention studies of short - and long - term health benefits of breastfeeding for both mothers and infants.13 — 15 Nevertheless, to our knowledge none of previous studies has systematically examined whether the increases in breastfeeding resulting from such interventions have equally benefited all socioeconomic groups.

All of them have their risks and benefits but none of them is clearly best in every situation.

None of this is to say that cession of Jammu and Kashmir wouldn't be a preferred policy, only that the benefits and costs are relatively indeterminate, and consequently unlikely to rely primarily or solely upon the Sunk Cost Fallacy.

There is no rule forbidding it, but practically speaking there is no way member states would agree to give all the benefits with none of the reciprocal concessions.

Many go beyond the recommendations of medical experts, and none is subjected to independent cost - benefit analysis.

Today Mr Hutton said «none of this should come as a surprise», noting that people who had been shut out of the labour market for ten or 15 years «are obviously going to find it difficult» to move from benefits to work.