While each day's meal did not provide a perfect «balance,» over the long haul, their nutritional profile conformed to just what they needed.2 Not surprisingly,
none of the children chose to eat a diet dominated by grain and milk.
Not exact matches
Before anyone starts trolling me: I am wealthier / more privileged than most; aristocratic background; LOVE
children but have
none of my own; can easily afford First Class, but just as often
choose to sit in PREMIUM ECONOMY (and a screaming infant is just as annoying in the back
of the plane as it is up front!)
The gist
of the argument, summarized in the current issue
of Foreign Policy, is this: «Across the globe, people are
choosing to have fewer
children or
none at all.
Quite frankly, its
none of their business how we, as mothers,
choose to feed our
children.
None of Lucy's five
children — one girl and four boys — has
chosen to tell their schoolfriends that their father is in jail.
What
none of these families knew at the time was that because they
chose a different public school for their kids, their
children would only receive three - fifths
of the funding they would have had they stayed in a district school — failing or not.
The answer should be «
none»; parents and
children ought to be free to
choose whatever education system they want, regardless
of how worthwhile other people perceive it to be.