Previous studies had determined that the general health of the ozone was improving, but
none of the data clearly defined the condition of the Antarctic ozone hole.
Not exact matches
Unfortunately it is currently lacking a lot
of information (no Nook
data, Azardi still a question mark), and has some incorrect
data in the Kindle listings regarding fixed layout that are
clearly based on specs rather than actual hands - on testing (i.e. just because the User's Guide doesn't list «orientation - lock:
none» as an option doesn't mean it isn't possible).
And we're interested in #FutureChat this week in hearing from members
of The FutureBook community about what else is needed in the way
of information, what better
data on production and sales might offer, not just to authors but also to publishers, their editors and acquisition teams, to marketers and publicity officers,
none of whom can see
clearly what reader - consumers are up to «by candlelight.»
None of this nonsense like with the Cook et al paper where they claim to have made all their
data available even though it
clearly is not.