Sentences with phrase «none of the evidence supports»

Not exact matches

The researchers asked a nationally representative sample of 1351 adults about six specific ideas, none of which is supported by evidence or facts.

There's empirical evidence that supports the existence of oxygen, atoms, neurons, gravity, etc., but none for God.

The point is that Christians need so many answers, none of which is supported by any evidence at all, whereas the atheist only needs one answer for all of them: There is no God.

Unfortunately for you, not only is there absolutely no evidence whatsoever to support any of these claims, the existence of any such God leads to numerous questions and apparent inconsistencies for which none of you can provide convincing answers.

Do this enough and eventually you build a relatively complete narrative that is internally consistent, but none of it can be supported with any objective evidence.

In point of fact Christianity is an elaborate web of such theories and claims, none of which is supported by any objective evidence.

None of the foundational parts of the bible have any supporting evidence, and the evidence we do have points away from a personal god, so those promises are unverifiable and when you're worm food it wil be too late.

There are many prophecies in thousands of religions that have regional and local fulfillment's throughout the thousands of years of recorded human history, however all of them rely solely on self fulfillment and none have any factual evidence to support any supernatural claims.

Normally I'm a bystander, laughing at the attempts of believers to support their cause with the justification of «evidence», but frankly, you have none.

However, as no evidence has ever been found supporting the existence of a deity, it must be assumed that none exist.

Ok, Johnny Mo, I will... they ALL have the same problem — that is, none of them have any supporting evidence and the claims of each lack empirical falsafiability.

There is a ton of objective evidence supporting evolution, and none refuting evolution.

And, while there is a mountain of scientific evidence supporting the «big bang» theory and the theory of evolution, there is none for a creator.

But people have been rooting against us purely out of hate / disbelief with none to little evidence supporting why.

For millennia, people seeking to make a buck have claimed that they have unlocked the secrets of romantic compatibility, but none of them ever mustered compelling evidence in support of their claims.

As far as actual, peer - reviewed scientific evidence is concerned, none exists to support the claims of The Warrior Diet so far.

Though none of its health claims have been supported by scientific evidence, it's widely popular and can be found in this BB cream by Vichy.

None of these assumptions is well supported by current evidence.»

Yet none of their complaints about the program being a federal takeover of Utah's education system is supported by evidence.

The interesting thing is to see that a.) None provide any credentials proving their methods are better; b.) they don't like the tone of the article — then again, a lot of people, when all they do is talk among those who only agree with them get offended when they run across someone that isn't in lock step with them; c.) they try to attack me personally, as a «hater», which is totally unfair and judgmental about someone whom they have never met; d.) can't point to any specific dogs with significant accomplishments that have been clicker trained — hunting, police, obedience, tracking, etc... and just finding a specimen or two isn't very convincing evidence... get enough dogs and sometimes you'll find the genius dog that almost trains itself; e.) there is no point by point refutation of what I've said, supported by third party evidence.

We always have multiple competing hypotheses, although in the initial stages, none of those hypotheses may have strong evidence to support it.

That's right: none of his risible notions are supported by evidence!

My best to everyone, and just to remind y ’ all, I'm still waiting for the first bit of evidence supporting AGW... none to date... still waiting...

I know a lot of geologists — I am one — and I know none who think CAGW is other than a half - baked theory without any supporting evidence.

The Plaintiff led expert evidence in support of her case but none of these witnesses were treating physicians.

The hospital ultimately moved for summary judgment, which the trial court granted, finding that: (1) the technologist did not act within the scope of her duties, as is necessary for the hospital to be vicariously liable for the technologist's conduct; (2) the plaintiffs failed to adduce sufficient evidence to support a finding of intentional infliction of emotional distress; and (3) none of the plaintiffs suffered actual damages as a result of the technologist's conduct.

Your skills · Experienced recruiter from any sector or teacher with a sales background · Evidence of delivering results · None aggressive negotiator · Can work comfortably within a team or individually · Possess a honest work ethic · Adaptable · Your Personal Traits · Confident, professional and able to build strong relationship · Passion for achieving consistent results · Desire to build a successful career · Ability to quickly assimilate new information and think on your feet Associated benefits · Competitive and negotiable base salary · Free car parking · Reduced working hours during School holidays · 8.00 am - 5.30 pm · Training, development and support · Team and individual Bonus scheme based on results · Pension · None corporate working environment · Private medical insurance including spouse · Incentive schemes · Company paid for social events and activities This is an immediate start however does take into account any gardening leave you may have.

For example, the Allen review9 found that none of the interventions designed for universal use in the early years (defined as conception to school) had «best» quality evidence available to support them.