But
none of the models fit with law firms.
Not exact matches
From comparison to empirical object, we estimate a T8 spectral type, but
none of the comparison object can accurately represent the observed near - IR fluxes
of GJ758 B. From comparison to atmospheric
models, we attribute a Teff = 600K $ \ pm $ 100K, but we find that no atmospheric
model can adequately
fit all the fluxes
of GJ758 B.
Since
none of these
models were
fit to any
of these measures, this is perhaps more likely a case
of you not wanting to pay attention to anything that might threaten your presupposition that
models can't possibly work?
That's not the case here: All
of these preschool programs are high - performing, but
none of them
fit the traditional «no excuses» charter
model.
None of the 4 door small car
models by Honda or Toyota would have
fit the bill.
The thing is, I know TONS
of super successful people, but
none of them
fit this extreme, celeb - lottery - winner TV
model.
I have twice in this thread said: «Wolf's final judgement on the matter can be found in part IV
of his 1893 Handbuch der Astronomie, where he declares that
none of the attempts, by himself and others, to
fit the sunspot number with
models based on planetary influences has produced satisfactory results.»
Comparing to a set
of model broadens the span
of results and give an impression
of agreement «within the error bars», but actually
none of the
model (nor the average) seems to provide a really satisfactory
fit.