Not exact matches
None of the funds made available by this Act may be used to implement an interim final or final rule regarding nutrition programs under the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.) and the Child Nutrition Act
of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1771 et seq.) that --(1)
requires crediting
of tomato paste and puree based on volume; (2) implements a sodium reduction target beyond Target I, the 2 - year target, specified in Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking, «Nutrition Standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs» (FNS — 2007 — 0038, RIN 0584 — AD59) until the Secretary certifies that the Department has
reviewed and evaluated relevant scientific studies and data relevant to the relationship
of sodium reductions to human health; and (3) establishes any whole grain requirement without defining «whole grain.»
An EPA
review of 27 states found that
none required regular air monitoring
of fracking and other waste materials that could emit benzene and toluene
Based on a pick - and - choose menu
of services that includes more than just editing — which right away is a departure from the standard, as too many «author services» companies
require all or
none expensive packages — the platform is delving into things like
review services that will send out copies
of an author's book to their channels, along with talks
of translation (an ungodly expense for indie authors that can easily cost upwards
of tens
of thousands
of dollars per language) and audiobook services.
In our
review of the game, our man Rory says: «
None of the game's environmental puzzles
require much brain power to solve but thanks to the various mechanics at play they remain interesting.
None of those long - settled rules
required the «magic wand»
of peer -
reviewed science; or the stamp
of approval from the NHMRC.
None of the contracts
requires scientific peer
review procedures for the selection
of research proposals.
None of the funds made available in this Act may be used to publish or issue an assessment
required under section 106
of the Global Change Research Act
of 1990 unless (1) the supporting research has been subjected to peer
review and, if not otherwise publicly available, posted electronically for public comment prior to use in the assessment; and (2) the draft assessment has been published in the Federal Register for a 60 day public comment period1.
In
none of those appeals was the appellate court
required to apply judicial
review principles.
Also,
none of the privacy protection standards
reviewed require that health care providers or health plans prepare a formal statement
of privacy practices for patients (although the major physician association urges members to inform patients about who would have access to their protected health information and how their health information would be used).