Sentences with phrase «none of the review required»

Not exact matches

None of the funds made available by this Act may be used to implement an interim final or final rule regarding nutrition programs under the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.) and the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1771 et seq.) that --(1) requires crediting of tomato paste and puree based on volume; (2) implements a sodium reduction target beyond Target I, the 2 - year target, specified in Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, «Nutrition Standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs» (FNS — 2007 — 0038, RIN 0584 — AD59) until the Secretary certifies that the Department has reviewed and evaluated relevant scientific studies and data relevant to the relationship of sodium reductions to human health; and (3) establishes any whole grain requirement without defining «whole grain.»
An EPA review of 27 states found that none required regular air monitoring of fracking and other waste materials that could emit benzene and toluene
Based on a pick - and - choose menu of services that includes more than just editing — which right away is a departure from the standard, as too many «author services» companies require all or none expensive packages — the platform is delving into things like review services that will send out copies of an author's book to their channels, along with talks of translation (an ungodly expense for indie authors that can easily cost upwards of tens of thousands of dollars per language) and audiobook services.
In our review of the game, our man Rory says: «None of the game's environmental puzzles require much brain power to solve but thanks to the various mechanics at play they remain interesting.
None of those long - settled rules required the «magic wand» of peer - reviewed science; or the stamp of approval from the NHMRC.
None of the contracts requires scientific peer review procedures for the selection of research proposals.
None of the funds made available in this Act may be used to publish or issue an assessment required under section 106 of the Global Change Research Act of 1990 unless (1) the supporting research has been subjected to peer review and, if not otherwise publicly available, posted electronically for public comment prior to use in the assessment; and (2) the draft assessment has been published in the Federal Register for a 60 day public comment period1.
In none of those appeals was the appellate court required to apply judicial review principles.
Also, none of the privacy protection standards reviewed require that health care providers or health plans prepare a formal statement of privacy practices for patients (although the major physician association urges members to inform patients about who would have access to their protected health information and how their health information would be used).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z