I would agree with Mr Dukes that
none of those criteria apply to an interim care order — but the problem in his argument is that Article 5 only applies if the Court agree with him that an interim care order is depriving a child of their liberty [Spoiler alert — the Court do not]
Note: If an insured person is under the age
of 16 years at the time
of the accident and
none of the Glasgow Coma Scale, the Glasgow Outcome Scale or the American Medical Association's Guides to the Evaluation
of Permanent Impairment, 4th edition, 1993, referred to in sections (6), (7) and (8)
of the above
criteria, can be
applied by reason
of the age
of the insured person, then an impairment sustained in an accident by the insured person that can reasonably be believed to be a catastrophic impairment shall be deemed to be the impairment that is most analogous to the impairment referred to in sections (6), (7) and (8)
of the above
criteria, after taking into consideration the developmental implications
of the impairment.