So take Jesus» words to heart when he says that it's
none of your concern who gets into heaven and who doesn't.
Not exact matches
The fact that we suppose that Hindus and Buddhists can be saved from Hell in their way need not reduce our Christian
concern for those in our own midst
who follow
none of the great Ways.
He goes his way indifferent to the distribution and division
of earthly goods, as one
who has no possessions and desires
none; he is not
concerned for his daily bread, like the birds
of the air; he does not trouble himself about house and home, as one
who neither has nor seeks a shelter or a resting - place; he is not
concerned to follow the dead to the grave; he does not turn his head to look at the things that usually claim the attention
of men; he is not bound to any woman, so as to be charmed by her and desirous
of pleasing her.
«Until we know the power
of divine grace, we read in the Bible
concerning eternal punishment, and we think it is too heavy and too hard, and we are apt to kick against it, and find out some heretic or other
who teaches us another doctrine; but when the soul is really quickened by divine grace, and made to feel the weight
of sin, it thinks the bottomless pit
none too deep, and the punishment
of hell
none too severe for sin such as it has committed.
Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very
concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list
of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone
who said a prayer and someone
who did not, and they are living the same way,
none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted
of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out
of marriage, lie, break every commandment
of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot
of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one
of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word
of God, God hates sin,
We have only one instance
of a movement in the opposite direction, Johanan ben Zakkai (died about AD 80),
who doubted the mechanical aspects
of ritual defilement and purification by water, etc., but felt obliged
none the less to maintain the commandments
concerned simply because they were commandments: (he said to his disciples) «By your life!
How do you respond to those
who would argue that many
of the sins you describe in this book were committed by others — in some cases long ago — and therefore
none of our
concern?
So glad that cheating and aspects
of the game that
none of us like to see didn't get rewarded, but
concerned at our ability in the final third, and passing inaccuracy, which was coming mainly from the new players, but also people like Ozil,
who we should expect better from.
In the midfield, (including RWB & LWB) we have a whole bunch
of tweeners...
none offer the full package,
none make sense in our manager's current favourite formation, except for Sead on the left and Ox on the right, and all
of them have never shown any consistency for more than a heartbeat... Sead,
who I'm including in this category because
of our present formation, looks like a positive addition, minus his occasional brain farts, but I would rather see what he could do in a back 4 before making my mind up... Ox,
who has never played better, which isn't saying much considering his largely underwhelming play in previous seasons, seems to have found a home in this new formation; unfortunately, can we really expect this oft - injured player to handle the taxing duties that come with said position over the long haul, not to mention, it looks like he has no intention
of staying... Ramsey has relied on the empathy that stems from his gruesome injury years ago and the excitement that was generated a few years back when he finally seemed to put in altogether, but on the whole he has been a big disappointment (neither he nor the Ox have scored enough to warrant a regular spot)... Wiltshire should be put on a weekly contract then played until he suffers his first injury, if and when that occurs he should be shipped - out and no one should very be allowed to say his name on club grounds ever again... Elnehy & Coq are average players
who couldn't make any
of the top 7 teams currently in the EPL... both have showed some great energy on the pitch, but neither are top quality and no good team can afford to have that many average players on their bench playing the same position, especially with Coq's injury history / discipline
concerns and Elheny's headless chicken tendencies... as for Xhaka, his tenure here so far has been incredibly underwhelming... we know he has some skills to provide the long ball but his defensive work is piss poor and he gives the ball away too cheaply and far too often... finally, the enigma himself, Ozil, so much skill with his left foot but his presence has been more frustrating than uplifting... in many respects his failure has been directly related to the failure
of this club to provide him with the necessary players up front, minus Sanchez
of course, and unless something drastic happens very soon his legacy will be largely a negative one (much like Wenger's)
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety
of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style
of play has become a shadow
of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out
of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid
of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi,
who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or
who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out
of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes
of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play
of Monreal, but
none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio
of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago,
who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part
of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part
of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature
of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player
of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out
of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front
of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens
who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that,
of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that
concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one
of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one
of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already
of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs
of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack
of mobility is an albatross around the necks
of our offence... so when you ask
who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because
of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Less
concerned at this stage with rumors about
who we might bring in as the seeming lack
of movement on the exit front... We need to offload at least 4 players beyond arteta an roszicky from Walcott Ramsey Campbell ox mert Gibbs flamini...
None is a guaranteed starter at arsenal but no one seems interested in taking the bite other than for ox
Although it will be incredibly difficult to ever match his contributions on the pitch, it's vitally important for a former club legend, like Henry, to publicly address his
concerns regarding the direction
of this club... regardless
of those
who still feel that Henry has some sort
of agenda due to the backlash he received following earlier comments he made on air regarding Arsenal, he has an intimate understanding
of the game, he knows the fans are being hosed and he feels some sense
of obligation, both professionally and personally, to tell it like he sees it... much like I've continually expressed over the last couple months, this team isn't evolving under this current ownership / management team... instead we are currently experiencing a «stagnant» phase in our club's storied history... a fact that can't be hidden by simply changing the formation or bringing in one or two individuals... this team needs fundamental change in the way it conducts business both on and off the pitch or it will continue to slowly devolve into a second tier club... regardless
of the euphoria surrounding our escape act on Friday evening, as it stands, this club is more likely to be fighting for a Europa League spot for the foreseeable future than a top 4 finish... we can't hope for the failures
of others to secure our place in the top 4, we need to be the manufacturers
of our own success by doing whatever is necessary to evolve as an organization... if Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke can't take the necessary steps following the debacle they manufactured last season, their removal is imperative for our future success... unfortunately, I strongly believe that either they don't know how to proceed in the present economic climate or they are unwilling to do whatever it takes to turn this ship around... just look at the current state
of our squad,
none of our world class players are under contract beyond this season, we have a ridiculous wage bill considering the results, we can't sell our deadwood because we've mismanaged our personnel decisions and contractual obligations, we haven't properly cultivated our younger talent and we might have become one
of the worst clubs ever when it comes to way we handle our transfer business, which under Dein was one
of our greatest assets... it's time to get things right!!!
None of this is
of any
concern to the defenders
of free expression,
who are thus unable to understand the controversy that so preoccupies them, one in which Rushdie and his writing are, strictly speaking, irrelevant.
Amusingly, the only reason any
of my friends use such terms (being the largely libertarian group that we are) is to have a dig at you pain in the arse lefties
who can't help but
concern themselves with things that are
none of their business.
The researchers themselves have always wanted to publish without restriction, and
of the 22 people
who met in Geneva, fully half were leading flu researchers, and
none of the rest were biosecurity experts
concerned with bioterrorism.
None of the researchers involved in such exercises dismiss public
concerns or deride those
who are offended by the research proposals.
For those
of you
who aren't as
concerned with price (don't worry,
none of these are like $ 1,000 jeans because lets be real here) I'm rounding them up by style for you below.
The consequences
of this are slim to
none, as authorities at large are more
concerned about the escape
of Sirius Black (Gary Oldman), the man
who gave up Harry's parents to Lord Voldemort, from Azkaban prison, as it is assumed that he is coming after Harry.
«I'm particularly
concerned about students
who are English learners because if they don't get reclassified by the time they are in high school, their chance
of graduating is poor to
none,» Vladovic said after the meeting.
I notice that
none of the representatives
of WD
who have commented here have felt any need to address Victoria's
concern (my
concern as well - hopefully the
concern of most
of the writers
who frequent this blog) about the implied endorsement
of their email intro for Trafford.
Conteh explores the fact that people posses their power solely within the actions
of a group, saying about the piece, «Africans
who act solely on the behalf
of the interests and
concerns of African people are Africans in their most powerful form, bar
none.»
None of us here need to wilt before anyone, family or otherwise,
who tries to belittle us for our deep
concern about this issue.
«For these people
who feel so passionately about this, their ultimate authority is a report from a group
of scientists, and they're saying «this is where we stand, forget about our moral
concerns, forget about our ethical positions, forget about whether we are Right, Left or centre, forget about whether we are Christians or Buddists, no,
none of that matters.»
Even those Members
of Provincial Parliament
who expressed
concern about this change, such as future Superior Court judge Albert Roy, recognized its importance in curbing abuses
of the trial de novo procedure, [10] and
none appear to have doubted the capacity
of the Provincial Court to adjudicate regulatory offences fully and fairly.
OTLA is hardly out
of step with this position: The very same
concerns were raised in 2007 by
none other than Ontario's former associate chief justice Coulter Osborne,
who wrote in his report on the Civil Justice Reform Project:
(
none yet) The society is now
concerned that
who holds the copyright to the «characters» is unclear, since two or possibly more entities or individuals appear to hold copyright to various parts
of the authors work.