Sentences with phrase «nonscience a»

or «nonscience» or whatever.
Just as intelligent design is a threshold question between nonscience and conjectures, anthropogenic global warming (AGW) is a threshold question between conjectures and hypotheses.
Neil Lock's essay did: «On Science and Nonscience» (wattsupwiththat.org).
It's nonscience (rhymes with conscience).»
If you only twiddle the knob labelled «CO2 ″ then it will be the only variable impacting the output... and if that same label represents the backward beliefs in CAGW «nonscience» (that's a new word that I lay claim to... nonsense, get it?)
Enough of this «greenhouse nonscience»... the study needed to protect «life as we know it» needing MORE «Public notice / concern» is in the production & consistent persistence of the Planetary Dipole, in both it's processes of production AND continuance.
That abject nonscience crap is public health dangerous.
As it was mentioned above, science - related academic pieces are likely to be written in APA style, while social and nonscience will be carried out mostly in MLA.
These concerns lie at the heart of an important book, The Myth of Scientific Literacy by Morris Shamos, who has spent many years in the US trying to communicate science to nonscience students.
But a recent informal study of 17,000 reviews done under the new system found that just 48 % addressed the nonscience criterion.
Like many pharmaceutical researchers, he has suffered through the drug industry's R&D downsizing in recent years and now is underemployed in a nonscience job.
Nonscience parts of the space program have borne the brunt of the cuts, but a bevy of science missions are also at risk, including the resurrection of Russia's lunar program.
In his 2010 book Nonsense on Stilts (University of Chicago Press), philosopher of science Massimo Pigliucci concedes that there is «no litmus test,» because «the boundaries separating science, nonscience, and pseudoscience are much fuzzier and more permeable than Popper (or, for that matter, most scientists) would have us believe.»
In fact, most of my friends from graduate school were nonscience majors.
We'll continue to offer the best how - to articles on the basic nonscience skills that scientists need to succeed.
No wonder Ph.D. s have difficulty making transitions to nonscience careers.
However, you can be considered with a 4 - year nonscience degree if you have taken several prerequisite science classes.
The increasingly popular middle course, of doing one science and two nonscience A levels, may be interesting and even broadly educative, but is no use to anyone considering studying science further into higher education.
From the outset, we wanted to cover all the important nonscience skills that young scientists need to acquire to be productive and successful.
The men are most likely to be in leadership positions and math - intensive jobs, whereas the women are more likely to be in health sciences or nonscience professions.
From its inception, the Career Development Center for Postdocs and Junior Faculty (CDC) has aimed to fill this deficit by educating young researchers in the large body of nonscience knowledge that young academic scientists need to advance their careers and the research infrastructure of the United States.
The student is considering dropping the class and pursuing a nonscience course instead.
While this prevailing opinion of nonscience graduates is rarely valid, there is an undeniable advantage to having a science degree.
These concerns stem from an overly simple demarcation between science and nonscience.
If the student is still considering dropping the course and pursuing a nonscience course or major, you have to recognize that the realities we face sometimes dictate the path we pursue.
Those who pursued nonscience or applied science degrees («artsies,» as my mechanical engineering father and brother called them) were not up to the challenge to succeed in the real world of numbers and rigorous scientific experimentation.
Science Careers discusses the value of teaching science to nonscience majors and a podcast segment addresses the effects of teacher quality on early reading.
As worthy as these scientists» scientific and public achievements are, when the average person can name maybe five science celebrities at the most — but could probably name more than 1000 nonscience celebrities (I'm just guessing, but if you have a few hours, try it)-- it's time to admit that we're using the word «celebrity» differently than the rest of the world is.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z