Sentences with phrase «nonscientists as»

Instead of peer review, for the most part, these other magazines hire nonscientists as gateway keepers who decide if a paper is trendy or not before it is peer - reviewed.

All the signals seem to be telling scientists (and nonscientists as well) not to go into federal public service.

Some scientific anniversaries celebrate events so momentous that they capture the attention of many nonscientists as well — or even the entire world.

One thing is clear: this research should be monitored by informed nonscientists as well as scientists for its theological, ethical, social and legal implications.

Not exact matches

The public needs to hear, in language that nonscientists can understand, the potential scientific, moral, legal, and social benefits, as well as the potential threats, posed by human cloning.

Having congressional committees such as the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology composed of nonscientists is in itself quite ridiculous.

These panels will be staffed by biomedical scientists both from within the institution and outside, as well as a veterinarian, a nonscientist, and a government representative.

So try to use a more specific vocabulary and be aware that words such as «creativity» may be understood differently by a scientist and a nonscientist.

If you would answer «yes» to these questions, and you're someone who enjoys explaining research to nonscientists, bringing people together from diverse professional backgrounds, and acting as a facilitator, then a career in an emerging area — knowledge brokering — could be an excellent choice for you.

Elizabeth Hadly, a biologist at Stanford University, gave a personal account of her experience as a scientist engaging with nonscientists, specifically artists, government officials, and military officers.

This is just as true for scientists as for nonscientists and this book contains much that both will want to think about.

Yet Illes and Wassermann are enthusiastic about my investigation, seeing it as an opportunity for a nonscientist to describe what, if anything, MRIs and other emerging brain - reading technologies can tell us about the three pounds of mushy tissue between our ears, home organ to that mysterious realm called the «mind.»

As a nonscientist, Unger approaches the problem from the standpoint of philosophy.

Debabrata Ghosh, a professor at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences in New Delhi, had a wider audience in mind as well: «I attended the March in Delhi to keep alive the tradition of asking critical questions and to bridge the gap between scientists and nonscientists,» he says.

I have actually had science writers who are nonscientists say that they felt their status as laymen made it easier to relate to their audience, while I have had science journalists who are scientists claim they don't see how one could be effective without experience as a scientist.

To cite the twentieth - century instrumental record, without mentioning all the melting — as even the occasional scientist may do before general audiences — is often suspected of being special pleading, trying to confuse nonscientists with carefully selected facts, what lawyers with a losing case sometimes attempt to do with juries.

The authors note that Oreskes» methodology is further flawed because it also surveyed the opinions and writings of «nonscientists who may write about climate, but are by no means experts on or even casually familiar with the science dealing with attribution — that is, attributing a specific climate effect (such as a temperature increase) to a specific cause (such as rising CO2 levels).»

The authors note that Oreskes» methodology is further flawed because it also surveyed the opinions and writings of «nonscientists who may write about climate, but are by no means experts on or even casually familiar with the science dealing with attribution — that is, attributing a specific climate effect (such as a temperature increase) to a specific cause (such as rising CO

Your last «cite» — Holgate (2007), from Proudman — as blogged by nonscientists is studied as homework.

I appreciate your point — but the simple fact is, we can't teach science to nonscientists, such as humanities students, the same way we teach it to science students.