Sentences with phrase «normal protein groups»

Namely, the increase of lean muscle mass remained the same in both the normal protein group and in the high protein group.

This is quite interesting in that the normal protein group was likely already in a hypercaloric state as they increased their body weight, yet the high protein group which consumed even more calories (about 20,000 kcals more over the whole study) did not see an increase in BW.

The high protein group lost an average of 1.6 kg of fat mass with the normal protein group only lost 0.3 kg.

At the conclusion of this study the high protein group lost an average of 1.6 kg of fat mass with the normal protein group only lost 0.3 kg.

Although the high protein group consumed 350 more kcals per day than the normal protein group, the high protein diet group saw no change in body weight -LRB--0.1 kg) while the normal protein diet group saw an increase in body weight (1.3 kg).

Additionally, the high protein group saw a 2.4 % decrease in body fat with the normal protein group saw a 0.6 % decrease in body fat.

This is quite interesting in that the increase in total body weight suggests that the normal protein group was likely already in a hypercaloric state as they increased their body weight, yet the high protein group which consumed even more calories (about 20,000 kcals more over the whole study) did not see an increase in BW.

Not exact matches

IgA specific for two cow's milk proteins (casein and BLG) in breast milk from the avoidance group averaged about one - third the levels seen in mothers with normal diets (P ≤ 0.01), Järvinen reported, even though serum IgA levels in the women did not appear to be affected by diet.

The group believes that in normal individuals, the prion protein works as a scaffold for multiple molecular interactions.

In an article entitled «Prion protein modulates monoaminergic systems and depressive - like behavior in mice» and published in the Journal of Biological Chemistry, the group shows that mice lacking normal prions show a depressive - like behavior similar to depression symptoms found in patients with Alzheimer's and prion diseases, namely Creutzfeldt - Jakob Disease (CJD), variant Creutzfeldt - Jakob Disease (vCJD), Gerstmann - Sträussler - Scheinker syndrome, Fatal Familial Insomnia and kuru.

Monitoring groups of mice, one group receiving normal levels of protein in the diet and the other group nourished with low levels of protein for five weeks, researchers were able to uncover the damaging effect a reduction of protein can cause to the structure of this vital organ.

The resulting films can separate one protein molecule from another onethat is only twice its weight, compared with a 10-fold difference needed for normal membranes, the group reports in this week's Nature.

A dietitian designed a diet that met each study participant's daily energy need and 750 calories in fats and carbohydrates were trimmed per day while maintaining the protein amount based on whether they were in the higher - or normal - protein group.

Part of the normal variation, which is equally present between blastocysts of both groups, can be observed in the gene expression of levels mtDNA encoded OXPHOS proteins.

Furthermore, there was a negative expression for Cyclin D1 protein in normal ductal epithelial cells, while the benign group revealed week positivity immunostaining Cyclin D1 in 60 %, whereas, the malignant group represented a variable positivity of immunostaining scores; they were classified as 3 (10 %) cases were weak, 9 (30 %) moderate cases and 12 (40 %) strong expression cases.

The Group studies how transporter proteins (in normal and diseased brains of different ages) modulate the extracellular spatiotemporal concentration profiles of excitatory (glutamate and aspartate) and inhibitory (GABA and glycine) transmitter amino acids.

Lindquist's group focused on a yeast protein called sup35, part of the normal yeast machinery for making all the other proteins in the cell.

We found that both groups, and individuals within the groups, could be distinguished from each other and normals based on their specific CSF proteins (p < 0.01).

For illustration, the average consumption of protein in the high protein group was 307 ± 69 grams, while the average consumption in the normal group was 138 ± 42.

The results of the study were obtained over a course of 8 weeks by monitoring the weight gain in two groups of resistance training individuals — one on a high protein diet, the other one consuming normal amounts of protein.

However, after the primary testing, going from two to three days after the exercise, satellite cells and myostatin molecules had come back to their normal numbers in the higher - protein groups, they were lacking in quantity in the lower - protein group for far longer.

In addition, this group recorded a significantly greater amount of consumed protein and calories than the group that consumed normal protein quantities.

Studying the table below, we notice that the group with normal protein intake increased the daily intake to 2.3 grams of protein per kg.

On the other hand, the normal and high protein group have added a significant amount of muscle mass — 2.87 kilograms and 3.18 kilograms respectively, which accounts for the increased weight gain.

In this study, the 2 groups consumed either 25 % or 14 % of calories from protein, while the total calories and percentage of calories provided by fat remained identical between the high protein and normal protein diets.

Both the normal protein and high protein group showed an increase of their resting energy expenditure, which could be due to burning the calories in the muscle building process.

The ratio of the normal group was 15 % protein, 44 % fats and 41 % carbs, while the high protein group received 26 % protein, 33 % fats and 41 % carbs.

The other two groups, which ate high and normal amounts of protein, experienced equal weight gain, and gained more than the low - protein group.

All study participants ate from the same menu, but researchers manipulated proportions of protein and fat to create a high - protein, a normal - protein and a low - protein group.

One group ate a normal diet while the other group took 60 gram soy protein supplements.

Briefly, the high protein group consumed about 500 calories more per day, with about 80 of those calories coming from carbohydrates (not statistically significant from the normal protein) and about 350 calories extra from protein (this was statistically different), and about 60 calories from fat (also not statistically different).

Furthermore, all of the starting and ending IGF - 1 values for both the control and soy protein groups fell within the normal reference range [83].

The normal - protein group also saw decreased gene expression of genes associated with oxidative stress, while the high - protein group increased the expression of genes associated with oxidative stress.

Interestingly, those eating the high - protein diet actually ate less dietary fat than the normal - protein group, suggesting that they should have observed increased insulin sensitivity.

Despite the fact that participants in both groups lost 10 % of their initial weight, only subjects that ate the normal - protein diet gained insulin sensitivity.

Lean body mass improved in the normal and high protein group and improved energy expenditure and only about 50 % of the extra calories were stored as fat.

No differences were found among the high (H - Pr), normal (N - Pr) and low protein (L - Pr) groups for the height at the shoulder.