One group of rats ate a diet of 5 % glycine, and the other group ate
normal rat chow.
Not exact matches
Both groups of animals ate
normal lab -
rat chow throughout the experiment.
The lab recently developed an animal model of BED in which
rats are given irregular, limited access to chocolate along with
normal chow.
Over a period of 4 weeks,
rats develop robust, binge eating (BE) of the chocolate with concomitant reduction in their intake of
normal chow and also showed increased impulsive behaviors.
The «
normal chow»
rats were the control group.
There were four different groups of
rats: 1) «
normal diet» eating with
normal chow in the refeed period, 2) cyclical restricted eating (bingeing) with
normal chow in the refeed period, 3) «
normal diet» eating with palatable food in the refeed period, and 4) cyclical restricted eating (bingeing) with palatable food in the refeed period.
In the first test, with 24 hour deprivation and
chow feeding, the
rats which had gone through restricted cycles of feeding (on both
normal and sweet food) ate 10 % more food than the control
rats.
The
rats who ate non palatable
chow and were on
normal «diets» were perfectly fine; the
rats who had eaten sweets but were on a
normal diet ate about 20 % more; the
rats who had been in restricted cycling patterns and refed on sweets ate 80 % more than control mice on
normal diets.
In the third test, in simple spontaneous feeding without a 24 hour deprivation window,
rats conditioned by sweet foods ate more than
rats on
normal chow, regardless of whether they had been restricted or not.