Not exact matches
Mainline Protestants (Methodists, Presbyterians, Episcopalians, and the like) and evangelical / fundamentalist Protestants (an umbrella group of conservative churches including the Pentecostal, Baptist,
Anabaptist, and Reformed traditions)
not only belong to distinctly different kinds of churches, but they generally hold distinctly different views on such matters as theological orthodoxy and the inerrancy of the Bible, upon which conservative Christians are predictably conservative.
Not that I think bad theology is a good idea, but for
Anabaptists, living the Kingdom and doing right (orthopraxy) has always taken precedence over theorizing about the Kingdom and being right (hyper - orthodoxy).
During the Reformation,
Anabaptists insisted on following literally Jesus» command
not to swear any oath, while Calvinists and Lutherans adhered to the traditional Roman Catholic use of religious oaths as an important expression of the religious foundations of political obligations.
The
Anabaptist rejection of oaths was
not merely an interpretative quarrel, but was understood more deeply as a part of the
Anabaptist rejection of Christian involvement in political and military affairs.
I don't want to come off as an
anabaptist, but it's so true!
In Niebuhr's memorable typology, the «Christ against culture» position is generally associated with the
anabaptists, Tolstoyans, and various sects that position themselves as communal alternatives to the larger society, based of course
not on ethnic distinctives but on fidelity to the gospel.
The
Anabaptists agreed with most of the ideas of the Protestant Reformation but felt that reformers like Martin Luther and John Calvin didn't go far enough.
I can't speak for Neil Cole, but I know that
Anabaptist ideas and teachings are somewhat in the background of Free Grace churches.
In a sense, what it means to be a mainline Protestant, as opposed to a Catholic or an
Anabaptist, is that one can
not be excommunicated for anything (except, apparently, for joining the Klan).
It's
not about John Calvin or the persecution of the
Anabaptist or those «Jonathan Edwards is My Homeboy» T - shirts.
The church, into which one is born (like the medieval Catholic Church), is distinguished by an ethic of conservation and compromise in its relationship with the surrounding society; the sect, which one must join as an adult (like the
Anabaptists), rejects the surrounding society and has an ethic of rigor, perfection and transformation; the mystic is primarily a subjectively religious person who is
not linked to any particular religious body (or, if linked to one, does
not find it very important).
Baptists are indeed heirs of the Reformation, but they are
not, nor have they ever been, mere clones of Luther, Calvin, Zwingli, the
Anabaptists, or anyone else.
I try to be
anabaptist in these sort of things, but by golly, I just can't do it!
Much of the recent theological reflection on martyrdom has come from thinkers in the
Anabaptist tradition —
not surprising, perhaps, since that church's historic refusal to use violence often resulted in
Anabaptists being targets of violence.
then going on about saying we shouldn't claim grace as a property or place limits on it while simultaneously you withhold it to «nasty Catholics, Muslims,
Anabaptists, Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, false Protestants»
Soon after there appeared on the scene another group of Christians who took a stand for violence —
not, like the
Anabaptists, as a means of relieving the oppressed and improving society, but as a political tool.
They were called
Anabaptists because they insisted that the baptism of infants was
not true baptism, that only believers should be baptized, and that if an individual had been baptized in infancy, after he had the experience of being justified by faith he should be re-baptized.
Second,
Anabaptists would do well
not to judge the motives of those Christians who take up arms for their country.
Unlike the other converts, Gerald Schlabach does
not come from a magisterial Protestant tradition of state churches — though some other
Anabaptists, like Yoder, have argued that the Mennonites also pursue a catholic (small «c») vision of the church.
Several other
Anabaptist groups also exist, but I'm
not connected to them personally.
The Protestant estates did
not protest when first at Speyer, in 1529, and then at Augsburg, in 1530, the Diet of the Empire invoked the old heresy laws against the
Anabaptists.
Though these «
Anabaptists of American education,» as I called parents who have opted for home - based schooling in The Dissenting Tradition in American Education, are certainly an increasingly diverse lot, they are united by a common commitment to the proposition that parents,
not the state, have the primary right and responsibility to direct the upbringing and education of their children.