Sentences with phrase «not abolish the law»

Jesus did not abolish the Law Jesus simplified the Law.

Not exact matches

Jesus did not come to, «fix» or abolish the Jewish religion that included the law.

Matthew 5:17,18 «Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill.

MATTHEW 5:17 «Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.»

As Jesus said on the cross «It is finished», referring to His earlier statement that «He came not to abolish the law, but to fulfill them»

Jesus was very specific in saying that He came to fulfill the law, not to abolish it.

Here's a biblical quote where jesus says we should follow the OT: Jesus orders Christians to follow the Law of Moses in the Old Testament: «Do not think that I [Jesus] have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.

«Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have come not to abolish them but to fulfill them.

However, Jesus himself said he did not come to abolish the law.

Matthew 5:17 - 19 «Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them; For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass the law until all is accomplishLaw or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them; For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass the law until all is accomplishlaw until all is accomplished.

According to Matthew, Jesus said, «Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law and the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfil them» (Matt.

Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.

Jesus came not to abolish the Law, but to fulfill it.

In Poland, for example, capitalism did not begin when in 1990 the Socialist planning board was abolished and market exchange began; or when private property rights were again respected in law; or when private profit was again regarded as a social good.

Remember what Jesus said: «Think not that I have come to abolish the Law and the Prophets; I have come not to abolish them but to fulfil them.»

Perhaps when He says He «did not come to abolish the law but to fulfill it,» He means that He intends to teach us not to be selectively literal, but to be introspectively literal, to apply God's teachings more aggressively to ourselves and hold ourselves to higher standards.

We can not of course go more closely here into the question why the Church has the right and duty, not only to promulgate and inculcate the precepts of immutable divine law and to supervise its observance, but on its own initiative to go beyond this and lay down positive legal prescriptions, and impose obedience to them as a Christian's duty, although they are enacted with full consciousness that they are not necessarily eternally valid but can be changed and even abolished.

Didn't He «fulfill» the law, not abolish it?

It can not change back, it can not be abolished (like a positive ecclesiastical law).

Examples of one or other of the two kinds of divine and unchangeable law would be, that a marriage between brother and sister is now invalid independently of the will of the Church; that a validly consummated marriage between baptized persons is indissoluble and that the Church has no power to alter the fact; that the Church can not abolish the fact that there are seven sacraments, nor alter the ultimate features of the Church's own constitution.

@truth1063 Matt 5:17 «Do not imagine that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets.

It was not until the great Civil War amendments that slavery was finally abolished and the promise of «equal protection of the laws» was made — a promise that has not yet been kept.

Consider what Jesus said as one of his first words: «Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them — Matthew 5:17 NIV

5:17: «Think not that I have come to abolish the law and the prophets; I have come not to abolish them but to fulfil them.»

Then Jesus would turn and say to those on the left, «I have not come to abolish the law, but to fulfill it.

Jesus did not come to abolish the law but to sum up the 10 commandments as 2.

He did not come to abolish the law.

Jesus» exact words when asked on who's authority to change Jewish Law: «I did not come to change the Law, or abolish the prophets»

But despite the real gains in social morality that came in the wake of the abolition of the slave trade, despite the rise in the status of women, despite the benefits that came from the enactment of child - labor laws and the establishment of the welfare state, did not the nineteenth century also bequeath to us those proposed «solutions» to social ills that led to mass starvation in Russia and China, to the utopian nightmares of communism and fascism, to wars unending, and ¯ in those societies that actually managed to abolish most social evils ¯ to a hedonism that is undermining society from within?

Matthew 5: 17, Yeshua states,» Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law...» In John 14, He states «Those who love me will keep My commandments.»

To put it another way, Christ came to fulfill the Law, not to abolish it, so He observed the Sabbath even in His Death; and Three is an important number for the Trinity.

According to Ephesians 2:14, Jesus did not come to abolish the law, but to abolish the enmity that existed because of the law — the enmity created by the law.

Jesus said: Matthew 5:17 «Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.

He clearly states «Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets.

According to Matthew, Jesus said he came «not to abolish... but to fulfill» the law.

Also, I just said this is about the public space, not what they think about all sins, and other laws existed but were abolished.

Jesus said that He did not come to abolish the Law but to fulfill it.

Let there be no mistake about the impact of the Roe and Doe decisions: they did not «liberalize» abortion law; they abolished abortion law in all fifty states.

Jesus is reported to have countered the charge that he was abandoning the ancestral Jewish heritage by saying, «Do not suppose that I have come to abolish the Law and the prophets; I did not come to abolish, but to complete.

No lesser a Christian than Martin Luther understood our predicament: Anyone, he wrote in ìOn Temporal Authority, î who tried ìto rule the world by the gospel and to abolish all temporal law and the sword on the plea that all are baptized and Christian, and that, according to the gospel, there shall be among them no law or sword» or the need for either»... would be loosing the ropes and chains of the savage wild beasts and letting them bite and mangle everyone, meanwhile insisting that they were harmless, tame, and gentle creatures; but I would have the proof in my wounds.î I do not believe that Hauerwas sees America's enemies as harmless, tame, and gentle creatures.

These laws, known as «Romeo and Juliet laws» provide that a person can legally have consensual intercourse with a minor provided that he or she is not more than a given number of years older generally four years but sometimes some other number of years Romeo and Juliet laws were passed Several ped membership org endorsed lowering or abolishing age of consent laws to legalize fleshly activities involving an adult and a child.

You are correct in saying that Jesus said he did not come to abolish the law or prophets, but you left out the important part about Jesus coming to fulfill instead of abolish.

Discriminatory laws enforcing racial segregation have been declared unconstitutional and abolished, while the dream of Martin Luther King (that every individual be judged by the content of his character and not the color of his skin) has been integrated into the American dream itself in a way that only Lincoln's Gettysburg image (a government of, by, and for the people) had been previously.

This is what Jesus meant when he repeatedly insisted that he had come not to abolish the law, but to fulfill it.

Jesus said he did not come to abolish the law.

and also Mat 5:17 «Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.»

He didn't distort the truth or abolish the law.

Jesus Christ came, not to abolish the Old Laws but to fulfill them.

First, the Parliament can to an extent block new legislation but it can not single - handedly do much, certainly not abolish existing laws (directives / regulations).

We don't however have to abolish our constitution, rule of law, independent judiciary and presumption of innocence to do so!