Sentences with phrase «not about intellectual property»

Not exact matches

«Our core advantage is what we've said all along, which is that it's about the intellectual property and the software, not about who's got the most real estate,» Hurd added.

While complaints about China's abuse of intellectual property rights are not confined to the United States, Trump's global steel and aluminum tariffs announced last week under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 complicate U.S. efforts to recruit allies to put pressure on China.

Do you have an invention, a patent or intellectual property worth millions of dollars but you don't know how to go about selling it?

And a third way is that these concerns will be acknowledged (proponents will say they're concerned about intellectual property, for example), but then they just won't respond to these things.

This press release contains «forward - looking statements,» including statements about Lexicon's growth and future operating results, discovery and development of products, strategic alliances and intellectual property, as well as other matters that are not historical facts or information.

By submitting User Materials to or using the Site, you represent that you have the full legal right to provide the User Materials, that such User Materials will not: (a) divulge any protected health information or infringe any intellectual property rights of any person or entity or any rights of publicity, personality, or privacy of any person or entity, including without limitation as a result of your failure to obtain consent to post personally identifying or otherwise private information about a person or which impersonates another person; (b) violate any law, statute, ordinance, or regulation; (c) be defamatory, libelous or trade libelous, unlawfully threatening, or unlawfully harassing or embarrassing; (d) be obscene, child pornographic, or indecent; (e) violate any community or Internet standard; (f) contain any viruses, Trojan horses, worms, time bombs, cancelbots, or other computer programming routines that damage, detrimentally interfere with, surreptitiously intercept, or expropriate any system, data or personal information, or that facilitate or enable such or that are intended to do any of the foregoing; (g) result in product liability, tort, breach of contract, personal injury, death, or property damage; (h) constitute misappropriation of any trade secret or know - how; or (i) constitute disclosure of any confidential information owned by any third party.

A screwball comedy about female friendship and intellectual - property theft (well, not quite, but we'll get to that), Mistress America breathlessly tags along as Brooke makes wild gesticulations and snappy pronouncements, by way of mentoring the decade - younger Tracy Fishko (Lola Kirke), a shy suburbanite newly installed in the freshman dorms at Barnard.

Sure, it would be nice to write and not worry about everything else, but I'm not willing to sacrifice my intellectual property rights and control to do it.

Well, I have been illuminated here because it seems pretty clear that the reason the credit bureaus are not giving that credit score is they're considering it intellectual property about how they're figuring out that score.

When we asked whos safety they were worried about, the security guard mentioned it is actually because the owners of the mall have intellectual property rights and don't allow photos to be taken.

So third parties being underwhelming is simply just an opinion anyone could say that about any publisher but what is not is AAA new intellectual properties this shows that third parties are not just resting on existing Concepts alone.

First - party Studios must work harder to maintain that attention cuz it is not simply just about a piece of software it is about making the hardware worth the purchase in the first place which actually means they can not sit there and put their entire bread - and - butter on established intellectual properties only.

Not really sure about that, Armored Core is unique intellectual property that was birthed by From Software after all.

Rights Granted by You: By entering this content (e.g., photo, video, text, etc.), You do not relinquish your intellectual property rights, but You understand and agree that Tiny House Design & Living LLC, anyone acting on behalf of Tiny House Design & Living LLC, and Tiny House Design & Living LLC's licensees, successors, and assigns, shall have the right, where permitted by law, to print, publish, broadcast, distribute, and use in any media now known or hereafter developed, in perpetuity and throughout the World, without limitation, your entry, name, portrait, picture, voice, likeness, image, statements about the Campaign, and biographical information for news, publicity, information, trade, advertising, public relations, and promotional purposes, without any further compensation, notice, review, or consent.

The problem is that many businesses and organizations don't want to be open about this because it can compromise intellectual property, or simply make customers not like them as much.

If you have «intellectual property» concerns about any of these, maybe Cory Doctorow's recent column in the Guardian will be of interest, though probably not much immediate help.

Professor Orly Lobel, author of You Don't Own Me: How Mattel v. MGA Entertainment Exposed Barbie's Dark Side, speaks to the ABA Journal's Lee Rawles about how an intellectual property dispute between the maker of Barbie and the creator of Bratz spun into a legal battle that would last more than a decade.

Sam Glover: Let's be clear, most people don't go around talking about intellectual property.

What I found by examining a millennium and a half worth of history in the Latin West and Early Modern period — involving such learned figures as Jerome, Augustine, Benedict, Cassiodorus, Bede, Alcuin, Anselm, Hildegard of Bingen, Galileo, Newton, Locke — was that the learned properties in question involved, if not consistently, a set of properties and rights that could be said to be formative in later thinking about intellectual property.

At High Tech Intellectual Property Legal Blog, California lawyer Judith Szepesi takes the position that these endorsements do not violate Model Rule 7.1 because they are not statements by the lawyer about his or her own skills.

It leads to endless wrenching debate about price, copyright, «intellectual property», the moral rightness of casual distribution, because each round of new devices makes the tension worse, not better.»

As it is not clear how long their search for a healthy business solution will take, it seems reasonable to ask — in the balance of private and public rights around intellectual property — whether their search should continue to impede public access to the body of research behind breaking stories about cancer and other health issues.

We act as in - house counsel for clients who don't want to worry about protecting their intellectual property.

Intellectual property attorney Dave Rein figured it was about time he got web - savvy when he realized his kids» elementary school was blogging and he wasn't.

Another strength of this book is that it focuses on areas that have been given short shrift in previous works on Canadian copyright: users» rights (an area of increasing importance, since most public discourse about copyright focuses on what we can't do rather than what we can); aboriginal approaches to intellectual property rights (which emphasize the protection of the honour of clans, cultures, and nations over the rights of individual creators); digital rights management (and its spectacular failure to actually protect content); and public licensing systems (such as the Creative Commons licenses).

Let's start with doctrine: — Current copyright literature Next to Genie Tyburski and the wonderful Virtual Chase — Virtual Chase Legal Research guide: Intellectual Property Law From Slaw's own Ted Tjaden, some Canadian links — Intellectual Property Law — Canada Pausing only to suppress my occasional cynicism about the length of time that Canada's policy - making on copyright has been going on, at least they have good resources explaining the process — Copyright Reform Process A few comparative links: the United Kingdom — Copyright on the UK Patent Office Site Next New Zealand — New Zealand Copyright Law How to do research on Australian copyright law — Intellectual Property Research in Australia Now two important US sites: first the authorized version — The US Copyright Office Next, a wonderful site that reflects some of Larry Lessig «s thinking at Stanford — The Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center And finally, reflecting the fact that so much law in this area reflects not domestic policy - making, but hard - fought international consensus, an Index to what the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), a United Nations agency has accomplished — WIPO Index And to conclude with an American and a European take on international copyright, since I was just in Chicago, look at Irene Berkey's links — International Intellectual Property and finally a European source (actually it's Swiss, but that's not obviousRobert Kraft, in his Diaries, quotes Stravinsky, la justice — c’est une invention suisse)-- Swiss Legal Research Center International IP Links, run by CMS von Erlach Henrici And finally, a nice and quirky piece on the oddities of copyright called — Digital Copyright & Copywrong by Peter Jacso.

For those that are likely to be targeted due to the work that they do (government, military / defence, handling commercially sensitive information like intellectual property, company secrets, financial transactions, sales deals, etc.), this is a relatively easy hack, and one that you wouldn't know about until it was too late.

4autoinsurancequote.com does not verify nor make any warranty or representation about the content, accuracy, opinions expressed, warranties, products or services, intellectual property compliance, or links of such Third - Party Sites.