Sentences with phrase «not about logic»

What's more, this discussion is often not about logic per se (e.g. rules of deduction and fallacies that result when they are violated) but the use of analogies as Lindzer's dirt kick and rock scenarios.

The very idea of abstract painting was not about logic; there was an individual anarchy about making truly abstract paintings, and of course Sam Francis was about that.

Pisces is the opposite of Virgo, and whereas Virgo is very analytical, logical and cares very little about feelings - Pisces is all about emotions and not about logic.

The heart of the dispute, as he showed, is not about logic.

This is not about logic, it's teens doing what they want without thinking about the potential consequences because they know they can get an abortion and take care of it.

Not exact matches

So if the consumer wants it, the market wants it, profits and performance aren't necessarily sacrificed, it could make your company more resilient, and make it easier to hire top young talent, why is there still a debate about the logic of being a socially conscious company?

Their questions won't just be about the deal structure, but also about the logic you used to arrive at the structure.

Not only is this type of warfare deeply antithetical to our form of government, but assertions about enemy safe havens also rest on the faulty logic that the past will repeat itself, exactly.

What is remarkable is that debtor interests have accepted this «don't worry about debt» logic about «automatic stabilizers» for nearly two centuries.

The development process of their projects wasn't affected in any way by the new Chinese laws, but if you bend the logic in some way, you can interpret people's reaction based on Singapore's geographical proximity to China and the lack of knowledge in some parts of the world about the relationship between Singapore and China.

My differences are based on judgements about empirical magnitudes and relative risks not questions of basic logic.

THis is not about belief, its about logic.

Suppose, further, that this issue was logically related to matters of principle at a deeper level, so that one could not commit oneself on this issue without also making significant commitments about the internal logic and character of the tradition as a whole.

I have to tell you though, some of religious folks would be a very bad people if it wasn't for the «fear of god» as they already don't know anything about logic.

What about the fact that the Odyssee has survived for centuries, longer than the bible, by your logic, shouldn't a story that has withstood the test of time and is still reproduced and discussed today deserve to be read?

Doctrine isn't about knowledge based on logic and evidence.

@ David By definition, Michael isn't actually a troll, since all of his arguments are logic - based arguments and pretty reasonable considering his standpoint, unlike the gross logical fallacies put forth by Cecilia Davidson (ULTIMATE ABILITY: you're wrong about everything because you're a bigot.

So, I guess I can understand the credulity of everyone who only understands what they're told and don't feel like learning anything about math or logic.

You try to use logic to show holes in current theory and then do an about - face when confronted with the same problem with god because he's supposed to wrap up that paradox so its not for you to think critically, which is iditoic in the extreme chad.

Don't try to talk about justice to other people until you develop a sense of fairness, logic, and some empathy..

Actually what is cool about logical paradoxes is that even in formal logic not all statements can be determined true or false.

Trust me, it's far more work trying to justify a delusion and rationalizing why what you believe isn't consistent with what you see in the real world than having one answer for all the questions you people flail about trying to answer and be able to rely on simple logic and facts to conclude there is no god.

The truth is you can go on and on about science and logic all you want but it doesn't address the fundamental questions of our existence, which is where faith comes in.

Those pastors where talking about the phony Christians too that are spiritually dead, not knowing Jesus» truth, listening to false preachers preach man's logic instead of Jesus» truth on their videos.

i do nt understand what religous people really believe is waiting for them in an afterlife when we know for a fact that the body doesn't go there and the fact that animals apparently cant go to heaven because they have no soul is well thats just good old conceited man made rubbish that is everywhere in the bible and before i get attacked i was raised religious and got very religious for a few years till i actually thought about it and applyed logic to it after that the whole concept of religion made me feel sick

That perhaps there is logic to at least be open to consider the possibility that us, life, nature, the universe, and everything may have come about through design in some sort of fashion or another and just because you may not understand it all doesn't necessarily mean that that there is no purpose behind it all.

You are so incredibly BLIND that you don't care about logic or even if the Bible is correct.

the logic of employees not being forced to work there is the same logic a republican had about why he didn't support the lilly?

Dr. Wickman should know better than to make unsubstantiated assumptions, exercise poor logic, and worst of all, make statements about scientific fields she is not educated in.

I believe that no one does the math — the logic of math is in favour of creation over evolution — «random chance» aka evolution is mathematically to astounding to believe — Alfred Hoyles number don't lie... and dna is a code — random chance can not create a code sequence nor can random chance ever improve itself... just think about it — mathmatically speaking there is a god or creator or creators of the code for life.

Although the term «logic» might suggest otherwise, I shall not be concerned with deductive arguments about nexus.

Knowledge of the cross is a matter of spirituality and faith, and does not require one to abandon logic and reason about matters of material fact.

The final proofs of logic and mathematics flow deductively from stated premises and achieve certainty only because they are not about the empirical world.

Again, you may disagree with any of the premises, you may disagree that you are dumb, that you don't know what you are talking about, that God exists and loves everyone, and fine, even if the logic is perfect, the conclusion isn't valid for you, since you don't agree with the premises.

The final proofs of logic and mathematics flow deductively from stated premises and achieve certainty only because they are NOT about the empirical world.

Perhaps our oldest references to how gifts are not just about relationships, but also carry a sublimated logic of exchange comes in Book VI of the Iliad, when Homer tells us about a gift exchange between two hereditary hospitality friends:

but, there are also lots of good police officers too... what amazes me is that no one — including cnn — want to talk about all the christians who everyday feed the starving, visit the inmates, support the sick and serve our country... please, use some logic and don't stereotype

«The trouble with this approach, of course, is that despite the veneer of civil religion, most people in America aren't worried about whether they break one of the Ten Commandments now and then, and they certainly don't see the logic behind the claim that infractions of that sort warrant everlasting damnation.

Atheism is not about discovering the universe through logic and reason.

Why are you not worried about offending these other Gods, is it because you don't believe in them and no amount of «logic» can convince of their divinity?

Though the Ctatholics are definetly wrong there is something very flawed with his logic about pagan stories being bundled together they was huge part of the bible they was in many places the hebrews came and went is it possible pagans knew the story of Abraham and Isaac of course I am sure word spread like wild fire not to mention is how do you know if they are pagan stories or true stories that the pagans decided to tell sounds to me like he just doesn't want to be held accountable.

Don't think about it too hard — the logic is simply beyond human understanding...

From a finite set of particular observations one can not derive a universal generalization with certainty (the much debated logic of induction can provide no inferential grounds for making assertions about all cases when only a particular group of cases has been examined).

By rationality I do not mean the self - consciousness about the principles of thought that is expressed in explicit logic or reflection about methodology.

So by that logic, without him, this man wouldn't be about to be put to death either.

Itâ $ ™ s like the crazy logic about homosexuality not being a choice (and Iâ $ ™ m NOT saying it is, Iâ $ ™ m just saying the logic of this particular reasoning is flawedâ $ ¦) Who, they ask, would choose a lifestyle that would get them persecuted, ridiculed and sometimes even killnot being a choice (and Iâ $ ™ m NOT saying it is, Iâ $ ™ m just saying the logic of this particular reasoning is flawedâ $ ¦) Who, they ask, would choose a lifestyle that would get them persecuted, ridiculed and sometimes even killNOT saying it is, Iâ $ ™ m just saying the logic of this particular reasoning is flawedâ $ ¦) Who, they ask, would choose a lifestyle that would get them persecuted, ridiculed and sometimes even killed?

It must be granted that Christian theologians have repeatedly denied the logic of their central conviction, as if the happenings which disclosed for them what reality is all about could not be trusted.

It is a man generalizing about what he imagines all religious people believe, and it is not based in logic.

A Christian doesn't believe there are many ways to heaven ------ And, this is a main reason why christianity and christians are so blatantly and hilariously flawed: it ignores the very basic logic that millions throughout the world will never hear or learn the first thing about christianity.

Don't get me wrong, I've been offended by numerous articles before, but I think it's the penultimate disdain for logic and reasoning that really angers me about this article.