Sentences with phrase «not about social issues»

This election is currently about the economy, not about social issues.

Not exact matches

The issues of globalisation and «social dumping» took centre - stage in France's campaign after Le Pen used the relocation of a Whirlpool factory in northern France to Poland to paint Macron as a globalist who did not care about workers.

The idea of speaking out about political issues via social media isn't restricted to Uber, Lyft and Trump's executive order on immigration.

The obvious issue is, Wouldn't the potential return on investment matter more to an investor than conscientiousness about social causes?

When asked about Trump's level of seriousness on the issue, the Republican said the president would not touch Social Security «until the first day of his second term, he told me once.»

Free, near - free, and not - free - but - amazing social media monitoring tools scour the gazillion conversations happening in the major (and minor) social outlets for topics of conversation and the sentiment about issues, brands, and news.

This means that we actively build companies to not only include a financial return, but also aligning them with social and environmental issues that we're passionate about.

I was looking going more into the free social media strategies course but it's not letting me input my email and comes back with a message to let you know about the issue!

People have the right to leave church and organized religion, they have a right to question an institution that will do anything to save face even if it means letting children be harmed (and trust me, there are Priests that have issues with girls - my mom when to an all girls» Catholic school in the 60s and talks about how many of the priests used to «hang out» with the young girls out and girls have been abused), churches that are not practicing social justice.

A church that is clear - headed about issues of sexuality will realize that it is not the great social fixer - it is both too unimportant sociologically and too important eschatologically for such false servanthood.

One of the biggest fallouts (to oversimplify) then was that conservatives cared about personal morality and not involvement in social ethics / issues of evil, while liberals cared about social ethics / issues but were seen as lax about morality.

Some people think that social or political solutions to these issues are impossible, and that the change of heart necessary for a real end to racism will not come about through legislation.

I make that unhappy admission not just because I still do not know my own mind clearly and systematically enough about four central issues of that practical theology task — contemporary social theory, ethics, ecclesiology and the history of spirituality.

«And there's another group who really liked Santorum,» Green continued, «and were quite excited about him not only because of the social issues but because they saw him as representing this positive role for faith and values in a society.»

«Very rarely,» he continued, «did Jesus ever talk about morality or social issues... Often, people want to talk about behavior modification, and our church isn't about that... We're about soul transformation.»

The New Deal did not, in their estimate, constitute the hardest step in bringing about a socialized economic system; the idealistic weekly was sidestepping the crucial issues of class conflict and the factor of coercion in effecting social justice.

He's passionate about social injustice and not afraid to engage political issues he sees as dangerous.

Religious affiliation appears to be a litmus test for people who don't want (or are unable) to think critically about more important issues like the economy, war, and support for public programs (education, social security, etc.).

David Landry does not hesitate to speak directly to corporate social issues about abortion, drug abuse, ecological rape, or minority rights in Metro City and beyond because he understands social contextuality as the norm for the Word realizing itself.

Anyone spending ten minutes on social media sites in the past couple of months will have seen Christians arguing about all kinds of issues, not least those relating to the LGBT community.

The conventional wisdom was that the group didn't care much about social issues like gay marriage and abortion — those were the province of evangelicals.

God is not reducible to social issues, no matter how worthy, and if we give the impression that these are all our faith is about, we are tacitly accepting that we've lost the intellectual argument about whether He exists at all.

Only when the minister gets very «radical» about either doctrine or social issues does serious protest arise, and even then there is a tendency to let the minister think his own peculiar ideas so long as not many people are influenced by him.

You mentioned somewhere that you had an instagram story about some hormonal issues, but didn't elaborate on those issues, and I don't do instagram (or twitter or facebook etc.) so I don't have access to that — do you replicate everything on your site that you put on other social media channels?

I want to talk about social issues,» the reporters would be like, «We don't care.»»

But surely it doesn't do the LPGA image any good when players seem unwilling or unable to speak intelligently about a cultural or social issue.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Don't pose direct questions, especially about serious subjects like school work, problems with social issues, or disappointments and failures in sports, etc..

«The overarching issue is that when kids are hungry they can't focus on math, music, science, social studies, or art, if they are thinking about when they are going to eat,» he continued.

«The overarching issue is that when kids are hungry they can't focus on math, music, science, social studies, or art, if they are thinking about when they are going to eat.

Mary Watkins and Susan Fisher, in their book, Talking with Young Children About Adoption, discuss adopted children benefitting from these relationships as they provide «not only a feeling of belonging but the clarifying understanding that prejudice and bad treatment are not an individual and private matter but a social issue.»

I'm hoping that I don't lose them over the coming days and weeks, because a lot of the social issues I write about (like gendering children) definitely pertain to childrearing, and a lot of these folks are very socially conscious and awesome people whom I am honored to have as readers.

I am sure that when these leaders wake up each morning, they are not thinking about foreign policy, but about domestic social unrest, the lack of provision of a proper welfare system, about how to deal with the issue of internal migrants (some 200 million people on the move from villages to urban areas demanding the same rights as urban locals), and so on.

While benign autocracy rather than Western - style democracy is still the preferred political model, it has not prevented the emergence of lively discussions about social issues, increasingly facilitated by the internet.

Are you telling me that chicks aren't all over guys that write about «new techie widgets for optimizing social response to social issues?».

So, the question remains: Does engaging hundreds of millions of people on the subject of conflict in central Africa «help» despite not actually confronting the root causes and longterm consequences, i.e. can it be celebrated as step, however small, in the right direction for social media, political activism and raising awareness about African issues?

«That is one of the developments in our politics that is most unpleasant, we can't take criticism, we can't take news that is positive about somebody we don't like, and so we have a lot of insults on social media and actually distracts from the issues and instead of dealing mainly with the issues, people rather take the route of trading insults.»

Many Americans continue to say their religious beliefs have been influential in shaping their views about social issues, including abortion and same - sex marriage, according to Pew research, but it doesn't always translate into votes.

The point though, is that (as I stated) Libertarians don't care about social issues like this.

Syracuse, N.Y. - Westchester County Executive Rob Astorino, who is thinking about challenging Gov. Andrew Cuomo this year, said during a stop in Syracuse Wednesday his focus would be on jobs and not the social issues he says Democrats use to muddle the message.

«Brian has been a leading voice in the fight for comprehensive criminal justice reform, and has shown a deep commitment to not just talking about issues of social justice, but actually delivering results.

Former Assemblyman and senior fellow at the Demos foundation, Richard Brodsky, says if there is another convention, it won't be motivated by concern about legislative ethics, but by social issues that people care more about, like schools, and pension benefits.

Continue reading» «Fuel duty is not just about economics, it's an issue of social justice» says Robert Halfon»»

Romney is a Rockefeller Republican not because he's a social liberal, but because he's callous about social issues and doesn't let them dictate his party control.

Though he didn't have complaints about his own advising experience, he decided to pursue the issue in part because «I've always been interested in these kinds of social justice causes,» Brozek says.

In addition to providing strategic advice, Brydon handles administration and security issues — «all the things that people don't think about when they think, «We should be on social media,»» Brydon said.

Even marginally more public statements about social issues don't seem to stir much gamer reaction.

Says Chung, who was a junior at a Los Angeles - area high school at the time,» [The riots] opened my eyes to how we do or do not teach about social justice issues in schools.»

I told this story to a group of two dozen or so of my fellow ed reformers last week at an American Enterprise Institute convening on «race, social justice, and school reform» because I wanted to make two simple (some will say simplistic) points: our expensive and aggressive ed reform efforts still focus far too little on what kids do in school all day; and we don't all have the same ideas about what it means to serve the cause of social justice — or whether it is even appropriate to place social justice issues at the heart of our efforts to improve outcomes for kids.

Former adjunct lecturer Betsy Groves, a licensed social worker and founding director of Boston Medical Center's Child Witness to Violence — a program that helps children, parents, and educators in violent communities or domestic violence situations — often hears how adults feel uncomfortable discussing the issue, thereby reinforcing the notion that we shouldn't talk about violence.