Sentences with phrase «not about the formation»

Its not about formation, but players.

Not exact matches

For the first time since becoming a mother, I was thinking less about how I didn't want to parent and more about how I did want to parent, particularly as it concerned my child's spiritual formation.

To agree on the priority of character formation does not mean walking away from concern about race and poverty.

For as well as theoretical reflection on the moral significance of a decision, there are other ways and means by which a human being can either become clear about the rightness and conformity to God's will of a decision, or at least improve the conditions for its correct formation: the general cultivation of courage, unselfishness, self - denial, the practice of the art of making vital particular decisions which can not be deduced by purely theoretical consideration as this art is taught by the masters of the spiritual life.

Discipleship is not so much about radical commitment as it is about radical love, and the disciplines are not so much about spiritual formation as about love formation.

Tietjen observes that «pastors who wanted to join [the Association of Evangelical Lutheran Churches] could not bring their congregations along because they had neither properly informed them about the events in the Missouri Synod nor adequately prepared them for the formation of a new church.»

The obligation to bear and communicate such meanings against his natural feeling and thinking was the ground of Jeremiah's discovery of his selfhood as «I.» Not the reception of the Word as such but the necessity to decide about it was crucial to the formation of this structure of existence and to its preservation and strengthening in the Jewish community.

If a college or university can't coherently articulate the integrated nature of its core curriculum — if it can't explain how all the disciplines relate to one another, or what role is played by moral and spiritual formation alongside the free enterprise of inquiry — then we should think twice about working for, attending, or sending students there.

Christian faith is not inherited; each generation, each individual, must learn faith anew.11 Recent Protestant innovations in membership procedures and sacramental practices are only the logical extension of long - dysfunctional assumptions about the faith formation of persons in the home, in Sunday School, and in the church.

...» There are observable facts that prove bible stories about Earth's formation AND bible stories about Noah's flood can not be taken literally.

Because when I read the Bible, I don't remember reading much about coal formation or tectonic plates or anything like that.

Church growth isn't just about money and attendance, it's about the formation of disciples of Christ.

Biologists do not agree about the mechanism of the continual disappearance of phyla in the course of geological time, a process almost as mysterious as that of their formation; but the reality of the phenomenon is indisputable.

These difficulties have led to a variety of positions about induction within the formalist tradition which range from the view that theory formation is not in its essence inference from particular to general (Goodman 1955, p. 68), to the view that there is no inference involved in theory formation, only conjecture (Popper 1963, p. 192; Hempel 1966, p. 15).

Anticipating my reaction, he adds, «Some people are concerned about naturalism,» but attempts to explain away that concern by saying, «If one is happy with natural explanations of the formation of stars and planetary systems, why not of plants and animals?»

Add to this that it is generally admitted that some seminaries and houses of formation did not, over an extended period of time, teach what the Church teaches about sexual morality, whether homosexual or heterosexual.

What do most contemporary NT and historic Jesus experts conclude about the historic reliability of the RCC's claims to «rock» formations and infallibility.

Then don't fucking pretend, like you have been, that it matches up perfectly with what we know about the formation of starts and planets!

The formation of the ice cream is all about chemistry and the honey does change the pH level (even if slightly), so there is a good reason for wondering if it would not work.

In 343 formation, ozil play as right winger, Just back to 442, where ozil play as playmaker behind striker, And enough about dlp (deep lying playmaker), xhaka is not pirlo, cazorla, and not even close to xabi alonso Jusyt play a pure dm, aka coqelin

but «build your own stadium» won't happen and the fans have to stop bitching about not being in the I formation and accept modern football to be able to be a whole new Miami vs Jimmy Johnson's Miami.

Tactics aren't just about a different starting line - up or formation.

DeBouchy — enough said... I feel for this player because he was one of the only Wenger players ever that he gave up on because of injury so there must be something we don't know about this situation... strangely enough his skill - set is much better suited for our current formation than Bellerin

I worry about tactics — inability to change formation, or when players don't seem to know their role on the team.

and I'm not sure about Monreal playing as a CB, so maybe Wenger has gone back to the usual formation and his using Gibbs on the LW?

This one is going to be more about the individual selections and instructions than it is the formations, and the interesting parts of the tactical battle will be who starts and what their roles are, not what formations the teams line up in.

lst season at stamford bridge, was the first time i saw that 4 -1-4-1 formation being used, and for some weird reason i feel a very strange negative vibe and well all know the outcome.the manager has come back with this formation and its not yielding result, but he still sticks with it.i do nt know much about formations dear friends, but if you are playing a slow dm in arteta and a very very slow cb, then you are toast against quality teams with sound tactics.wen playing wellbeck as a lone striker, i think 4 -2-3-1, will work better, but if we have a big player like oliver (boooos), thn we can try the 4 -1-4-1, thingy cos he can hold the ball for our midfielders to run in.but on the overall, shame on wenger for not giving our defence a good cover DM.NO BODY PLAYS A SLOW DM / CB AND EXPECT TO B REGARDED AS CHAMPIONSHIP MATERIAL.IT HURTS GUYS, REALLY HURTS.

If your CB's are awful in a 4 back system then they'll be exposed as well in a 3 back system no matter what happens.You're just delaying the time for them to get exposed and deceiving yourself.Our problem was not about formation.It was about tactics yet no one saw this and thought 3 -4-3 was our saviour.Look at our starting CB's in 4 back: Koscielny and Mustafi who are all quality.The midfield is the problem.It's not the 3 back or 4 back.In 3 back also our players are not suited for that formation hence I advice Wenger to switch back before it's too late.We need to revert to 4 back and play the right players in the centre.We needed a DM to make our midfield stable but we didn't so we have to make do with what we have.

Mexico didn't experiment, and that's fine - Miguel Herrera has talked about wanting his team to be more versatile, but they played the same formation and style as they always have under him tonight.

hmm so this man decides to use all the transfer window to get a cheap defender and ends up still paying over, I will never understand how wenger thinks, God help us I pray this should be his last season, its not even about transfers any more formation and tactics wise, wenger is dead

The tactics of 4 -1-4-1 has led the players astray, meaning they do not know crap about the formation so the run around the place without any direction > The players role in this formation have not been define, what i am basically saying they do not know what is their function (what to do)

And about the 3 -5-2 formation, I don't think that will work, this Arsenal we are talking about.

I do not think we can say the same thing of Alex Oxlade - Chamberlain, though, despite the boss saying a lot of good things about the dynamic England international and despite the fact that he seems to have found a new lease of life as a wing back in Wenger's new three at the back formation.

Wenger rarely changes formation, rarely surprises with the odd player asked to do something different and will be telling the players to let them worry about us.This will not work against Citeh.

Titi may not agree about Giroud dropping to the bench as he seems to think that all Giroud needs is a partner up front, but I can't see Wenger switching to a 442 kind of formation.

Tbh I think the formation Wenger has played for the first few matches has not worked, and I have wondered whether Ozil's comments about being one of the best No. 10's in the World, has been motivated a little by his being stuck on the left.

When I supported Wenger when he didn't buy Cesc back, didn't know he was about to change formation to 4 -1-4-1 which I find Bizzare since it obviously kills Ozil's abilities.

Its almost as if they shit themselves and backed off of city and as Ive already said there was None in the team who wants to own the responsibility when the chips are down everyone turns their backs and more or less says «its not down to me» «its not my responsibility» and Wenger who should be appointing a player to lead when we are up against it or at least chopping and changing formations ect and revitalising the side just rants at the ref and means about offside.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

As well as his goals, Willian won both penalties and put in the kind of effort we've come to associate with him, in what will surely give his manager a bit of a headache about sticking with the 3 -5-2 formation that does not really accommodate his talents.

Well I am one that doesn't like the formation we play and I agree 100 % about players playing out of position.

We already moan about Santi being used out wide, because it is NOT his natural position, well, to change tactics, formation, during a game, requires players changing roles and substitutions in order to carry it out.

Well he is only the MANAGER, who buys, sells, coaches, picks, subs and decides team shape / formation, so yes, you must be right, we should not be «obsessing» about him, if we want success.

And I've just listened to Wenger on sky sports talking about the change in formation, it's because we conceded a lot of goals to the top teams, oh so now we can't beat the lower teams, good decision wenger!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And the Ox looks likely to mostly end - up playing right - wing - back with the new formation, which maybe he's not too happy about?

Singled out players he don't particularly fancy (ok, we all do that), speculate in idle fantasy about bringing in this player and that player in line with the formation.

On the one hand, we have everyone complaining about Valverde's tactics — not attacking enough, 4 -4-2 is not a good formation, that Valverde doesn't rotate enought.

But it's not just about the 3 -4-3 formation at the back but also about the quality of the players to suit the team dynamics, whether in transition or regrouping defensively, depending on the suitability of the players.

My fellow gunners Wenger is a failure either you admit or not, though this is a preseason match which is less important just to make the players gain fitness, before the competitive matches commence, but at the same time Wenger's tactics and formation should be questioned especially against big teams, he had conceded numerous goals against big teams in which today's match is a reflection of what we are talking about, his old and out dated philosophy is no longer valid in modern football, no wonder Alexis Sanchez can't confide in his plans to propel the team in winning major honours, Wenger still believe in some of the bunch of fringe players he should have gotten rid of in the team and replace them with world class players or players that are hungry for success like Alexis, anyway there is still much time in the transfer window presently to do that, if he can change the hands of time and stop being too stubborn.

its better i don't think about d formation... its good we have so many options to choose from