Sentences with phrase «not absorb more water»

Not exact matches

If all the flour does not absorb into the dough, add more water a teaspoon at a time.

If the rice isn't done to your liking, add 1/2 cup more water and simmer until absorbed.

Make sure the yam is not too dry, if necessary add a little more water, the noodles can sometimes keep absorbing liquid.

100 g) 225 g whole grain rye flour 225 white wheat flour (or bread flour) 2 tablespoons of roasted rye malt * 350 g water - 77 % hydration dough (pay attention to the water level, adjust it to your flour's absorbance - if you flour absorbs less water, add less water in the beginning, it is easy to add it more later if necessary) 9 g fine sea salt Fruit soaker 40 g dry apples, chopped to small pieces 100 g dry prunes 50 g rum Other 60 g chocolate chips (I used these) orange zest of 2 organic oranges 70 g roasted hazelnuts, chopped (roast them for 8 - 9 minutes at 230 °C / 446 °F) * if you don't have roasted rye malt at hand, substitute it for cocoa powder but make sure you add some (appr.

1 cup uncooked Pear Barley (boil it with 3.5 cups water, until all water is absorbed, make sure it is nice and soft for baby, if not add more water) a little onion (a thin slice, chopped very fine).5 — 1 tsp minced garlic (adjust to personal taste, my baby loves garlic) 10 mushrooms, chopped fine a handful of spinach or field greens, chopped a sprinkle of cheese of your choice (more if you are trying to add calories in diet) a splash of olive oil

Though wool cloth diaper covers and wool diaper wraps are NOT waterproof, they are water - resistant and untreated wool can absorb more than three times its weight in moisture before it begins to feel wet; an awesome attribute for a cloth diaper cover most loved for effective night time diapering.

If still not absorbing, then check to see if your water is hot inside the machine and perhaps use more detergent next time.

«At the current rate of change, there is not much more room for the waters off the Oregon coast, for example, to absorb more CO2 without crossing the threshold,» Waldbusser says.

That deep water is not only rich in nutrients, it also has relatively high concentrations of carbon dioxide, both because it is cold (cold water can absorb and hold more carbon dioxide than warm water) and because the decomposition of organic matter that sinks into the depths releases carbon dioxide.

He notes that DMF could rapidly replace ethanol, because it not only provides more energy but also has a higher boiling point (allowing DMF to blend more easily with gasoline) and it does not react with water (ethanol absorbs atmospheric water vapor, which degrades its potency).

This isn't just a small amount of salt dissolved in water, but rather water that has absorbed as much natural salt as it is able and will not absorb any more (26 % actually....

Almost all of the water should be absorbed — add more if you need to along the way, the pot shouldn't run dry.

When I make my morning smoothie it includes 3 oz of spinach, 3 oz of assorted kale (seasonally available here in Georgia and a cup of mixed frozen berries blended with some soy milk (deliberately not in a vitamix to retain more fiber) then I mix in 2 tbsp of chia, which absorbs up to 30x it's weight in water and gives you a major load of fiber.

Therefore, to absorb even more water within your body doesn't make a lot of sense.

And now (late 2012 / early 2013) Consumer Reports has reported that most rice has arsenic in it, and the traditional Asian method (of boiling it in a large quantity of water and draining it before eating) gets rid of much more arsenic than the typical American way of cooking rice (just using as much water in the pot for cooking that the rice can absorb, and not rinsing it or draining it after cooking, which leaves all the arsenic in the serving).

Away from the dense network of heat absorbing (daytime) then heat radiating (nighttime) structures which is the Urban Heat Island and above the air with high water vapor content trapped by the valley along the river, not to mention the pall of coal dust over the city, morning low temps were much more like what the natural countryside would experience.

Words only have meaning in context and while it may be true that water vapor is a greenhouse gas in the sense that more of it in the atmosphere will absorb more infrared radiation and warm the climate, it is not a greenhouse gas in the sense that it is a gas we need to seriously worry about adding directly to the atmosphere.

Warming must occur below the tropopause to increase the net LW flux out of the tropopause to balance the tropopause - level forcing; there is some feedback at that point as the stratosphere is «forced» by the fraction of that increase which it absorbs, and a fraction of that is transfered back to the tropopause level — for an optically thick stratosphere that could be significant, but I think it may be minor for the Earth as it is (while CO2 optical thickness of the stratosphere alone is large near the center of the band, most of the wavelengths in which the stratosphere is not transparent have a more moderate optical thickness on the order of 1 (mainly from stratospheric water vapor; stratospheric ozone makes a contribution over a narrow wavelength band, reaching somewhat larger optical thickness than stratospheric water vapor)(in the limit of an optically thin stratosphere at most wavelengths where the stratosphere is not transparent, changes in the net flux out of the stratosphere caused by stratospheric warming or cooling will tend to be evenly split between upward at TOA and downward at the tropopause; with greater optically thickness over a larger fraction of optically - significant wavelengths, the distribution of warming or cooling within the stratosphere will affect how such a change is distributed, and it would even be possible for stratospheric adjustment to have opposite effects on the downward flux at the tropopause and the upward flux at TOA).

These gardens could absorb more than 5.7 million gallons of water every year, not to mention the millions of gallons already being absorbed by the existing parks.

When the ocean absorbs CO2 from the air, not only does that CO2 increase the temperature of the water, and cause more ice melt, but it also causes ocean acidification.

The oceans, too, absorb a lot of CO2, although that's not a good thing because it makes the water more acidic.

For example, the scientific explanation that temperatures have not risen since 2001 is because an «upward push by anthropogenic forces was temporarily offset by a downward pull as solar activity decreased and the oceans absorbed more heat than usual from the atmosphere (sea water temperatures continued to rise)».

Also you focused on re-radiating meaning emitting long - wave spectrum - which possible, but I was thinking more about emitting the same wavelength, as mentioned in this quote: «However, aerosols (which often contain water and if so can absorb red wavelengths) are usually larger than visible wavelengths and therefore absorb and reflect all wavelengths of light equally (this is not technically scattering, although it is often called that; it technically involves absorption and re-radiation, or reflection).»

In the heavier denser liquid water of the ocean transit is slowed down even further, some fourteen times more than in our atmosphere, as water being a transparent medium for visible light transmits it through unchanged but delays it in each encounter as it tries to absorb it but can't.

But the effects of melt aren't confined to the Arctic: Ice reflects the sun's rays, so as it disappears, more ocean waters, which absorb those rays, are exposed, intensifying regional and global warming.

Basically, Dr Ferenc Miskolczi's life as a NASA climate research scientist was made hell because he discovered that the extra water vapour being evaporated is not having a positive - feedback (increasing the CO2 warming effect by absorbing more infrared from the sun), instead it is going into increased cloud cover, which reflects incoming sunlight back to space.

Climate Astrology: «Global Warming» commands sea level rise Increases... & sea level rise slowdown: NASA discovers that «global warming» is slowing and not increasing sea level rise — NASA study claim: «Because the Earth has become more parched, partly because humans are pumping out more ground water, the rising oceans are being absorbed by lakes, rivers, and underground acquirers, much like a sponge absorbs water.

As obvious on figures 6 - A and 6 - B, Ttop and Ptop are determined by the water vapour that radiates over some 1900 cm - 1 much more than the 40 cm - 1 of the tropospheric CO2 near 614 cm - 1 and 718 cm - 1.; stratospheric radiation to the cosmos is not very important because the cooling of each layer is exactly equal to its heating mostly by UV absorbed by Ozone.

Not only will melting Arctic sea ice raise global sea levels, it will also allow the earth to absorb more heat from the sun because ice reflects the sun's rays while blue open water absorbs it.

Water absorbs more heat than does the land, but its temperature does not rise as greatly as does the land.

But it is not — water vapor is much more important and they both simultaneously absorb OLR, the out - going long - wave radiation.

Not evenly of course, I suppose the curve (absorbed energy vs depth) would have logarithmic shape, more or less where bulk of the energy is absorbed by the first few centimeters of water.

2) We have INCREASING POSITIVE feedback effects from (a) melting tundra, (b) melting melting hydrates in the oceans, (c) lower reflectivity (albedo) of the Arctic itself, not to mention its next door neighbor Greenland, (d) increased fires in northern Asia and North America which will further exacerbate albedo, (e) LESS ICE AREA to reflect sun in the Arctic... and thus allow that nice dark water to absorb more and more sun.

Whether there is 0.03 % or 0.04 % of CO2 in the atmosphere only influences how often the photons get absorbed and re-radiated on their way to space — an increase in CO2 delays the process a little but does not change it fundamentally and * Does * * Not * * Trap * * Heat * any more than a sieve traps watnot change it fundamentally and * Does * * Not * * Trap * * Heat * any more than a sieve traps watNot * * Trap * * Heat * any more than a sieve traps water.

A radiated IR photon is going to be absorbed directly, and not wait around for man to release CO2 to cause warming to cause more water vapor molecules!

Is there any likelihood a bloom of plankton (from a freshwater pulse, or fallout of a dust cloud full of minerals, for example) would change the temperature of the surface water (change the reflectivity, I suppose, or change how much is absorbed by making more complicated molecules for photosynthesis)-- sufficient to make the water mass density change, affecting whether it sinks or not?

The only way CO2 could absorb any more IR than it is already absorbing is if 1) the surface started re-emitting more IR, which could only happen if more sunlight reached the surface, or 2) atmospheric water vapor levels dropped, freeing up more IR to be absorbed by CO2, in which case, warming would not occur, because that radiation was already being absorbed by the water vapor that disappeared.

Doesn't that then mean that there are no more photons to be absorbed by the added water vapor produced as a result of the added heat from the CO2 associated warming?

What is also happening here is «absorption», the longer wave lengths of light get absorbed by water earlier than the shorter waves lengths, red light doesn't penetrate as deeply as blue light because it gets absorbed more readily.

Some situations that occur in flood - prone areas include: 1) the diameter of the sewer pipe is not sufficient to hold all of the water flow during a heavy storm event; 2) the gradient of the sewer pipe is not steep enough to allow water flow at the same rate as the rain; and 3) heavily paved areas do not allow water to absorb into the ground, forcing more water into sewers.