If
not accepted the case would be reopened.
Many lawyers throughout the San Diego, CA area may
not accept cases they feel will ruin their reputation; conversely, we strive to improve our reputation by taking on challenging Underage DUI cases.
There are two basic problems with your theory: You say: can't one accept a case on contingency and «as time permits,» so that in such an event one would simply drop the contingency case (or, if it looked promising, hand it off to some other lawyer in a slump)?
We do
not accept every case.
There may be various reasons you would
not accept the case for full representation, including a case falling outside your area of expertise, requiring too much of your time, or lack of merit.
We do
not accept cases in which a person has not yet been convicted or sentenced.
Remember, ICBC will
not accept the case value you believe is fair just because you send them basic evidence.
If we talk, but I do
not accept your case and enter a representation agreement with you, then I am not your attorney.
I can't speak for other lawyers, but if you see me I will
not accept a case where I can't help my client.
We do
not accept cases from insurance companies.
Not exact matches
But often you can't, and whatever you lose, you have to
accept that you don't have it any longer and continue with your business, in some
cases, as if you're starting that day.
However, our thorough internal investigation established that this was
not a
case of discrimination based on appearance, and we do
not accept this characterization in the complaint.»
That was
not the
case, as just 34.6 % of students
accepted a job offer from their internship in 2014, down from 39.1 % in 2013.
AOD only
accepts pro bono
cases at the moment and it's
not just for anyone.
As a marketplace, Airbnb
not only has to make it easy to pay its hosts — who in this
case live in Brazil — but also
accept methods of payments that are convenient for guests.
«Why are arguments over a business
case not accepted?»
They may end up making or
accepting a partial response in
case it is permanent, but
not, initially, the whole response, in
case it is
not.
In this
case, the Council promoted the formulation of a new authorization category for BankA companies that
accept public funding up to 100 million Swiss francs, but do
not invest or pay interest on those funds.
If the factor is non-recourse, which in that
case the borrower is
not responsible for paying back any unpaid invoices, and the factor
accepts the loss.
In the
case of bitFlyer, the policy would cover losses for retailers that
accept bitcoin in the event that a customer transaction doesn't go through due to technical problems.
Unfortunately, many of us have already been conditioned to
accept these proclamations as fact without even conducting any independent research on our own to (1) determine if the authoritative figure is even an authority on the topic, which in many
cases, he or she is
not; and (2) determine if what the authoritative figure is stating is actually true or
not.
Everyone's at it, and while most people aren't breaking the law in the pursuit of profit, there's a
case for saying that manipulation should simply be
accepted as part of life.
As was previously the
case, the Bank looks to ensure that the quality of the securities it
accepts as collateral are
not dependent upon the financial viability of the institution offering the securities to us — there is separation between who we deal with and whose securities we
accept.
In
case you are
not familiar with Cryptocurrency, the reason why we decided to
accept it is due to several factors, but mainly because it provides additional layers of security and privacy...
NO2XIf Breaking Bitcoin in Paris can be considered at all representative of SegWit2x's community support — which, it should be noted, is
not necessarily the
case — the proposal will face an uphill battle to be widely
accepted in November.Indeed, some signatories of the agreement are
not so sure about the hard fork anymore: Bitwala and F2Pool have publicly backed out of the agreement.
This being the
case, you will be frustrated if you are a resident of the USA trying to signup for an account and trade through HighLow because the broker does
not accept trades from the USA.
It is more comfortable to be socially
accepted than
not, which is unfortunately also often the
case for apostates.
I'm sure most people know this, but in
case it helps someone: Denominations that always
accept female pastors include PC (USA), that is Presbyterian Church, USA, most African American denominations (note that all pastors mentioned in the original article were African Americans), United Methodist, Foursquare, at least some Vineyards if
not all, Congregational, Disciples of Christ, Lutheran and Episcopalian churches.
I said it to hotair already, but I will expand it a bit for you: what is evidence for some is
not accepted by everyone; just as in a court
case, some jurors are convinced with very little evidence while some people can
not be convinced of something no matter how much evidence there is... much of this comes from how you were raised and your own personal world view, for many people God does
not fit into their world view so whatever evidence there is they close their eyes and say, «No, I don't believe that!»
It's the 0.001 % of them who hold rallies, blow themselves up, and go on television / radio (in the
case of Fox News, start their own network) who HATE the fact that there are those of us out there who do
not accept the idea of God or Jesus or Allah and think it is unacceptable.
I know that it is common thought that you just
accept Jesus and get forgiven for everything and then just keep on living your life, but that is
not the
case.
In this
case you have too much of a good thing when people can't
accept that they can
not or do
not know something.
Furthermore, similar efforts to prioritize minorities have
not precluded the country from
accepting compelling
cases from majority groups.
Thus, metaphors and models of God are understood to be discovered as well as created, to relate to God's reality
not in the sense of being literally in correspondence with it, but as versions or hypotheses of it that the community (in this
case, the church)
accepts as relatively adequate.16 Hence, models of God are
not simply heuristic fictions; the critical realist does
not accept the Feuerbachian critique that language about God is nothing but human projection.
The Maudoodi school, on the other hand,
accepts only the Qur» an and the Hadith as the infallible sources of law and does
not regard the decisions of the medieval jurists as binding in all
cases.
xx4zu1 - «the point that was made is that religion is the only thing that is given to you, in most
cases, at birth that you can chose
not to
accept.»
The writers were evidently aware (perhaps they had learned by experience in trying to win credence for their message) that the mere fact that the tomb appeared to be untenanted, even if it were
accepted, would
not necessarily prove their
case.
This was very important in Gaebelein's
case: he might
not have been
accepted as a leader within fundamentalist evangelicalism, nor become a famous Bible and prophecy conference speaker, if he had
not changed his view.
In any
case it was probably inevitable that Bultmann's pupils (such as Günther Bornkamm)-- while
accepting his negative verdicts that Jesus did
not think of himself as Messiah, Son of God, or Son of Man — should refuse to
accept the dispiriting embargo on all discussion about how Jesus did regard himself, and refuse as well to
accept the excessively rigorous skepticism about the facts behind the Gospels» literary forms.
Some of what I've researched and confirmed a long time ago is now starting to surface more publicly in newer discoveries so I believe it's probably now only just a matter of time before people as a whole start becoming more aware that what they've always thought and
accepted to be true may
not necessarily be the
case but with that also probably gain a far better understanding of the world around us.
Finally, the objections are based on careful research developed by responsible experts and widely
accepted by the public, in one
case that children «s ads exploit children who are
not yet old enough to discriminate, and in the other that violence on television causes violence in actual behavior.
(A
case in point is that of a publicly supported, church - related hospital which is the only hospital in town and which refuses to permit certain medically
accepted surgical procedures — such as abortion or tubal ligation — which are objectionable to the church but
not to the patients of other faiths or no faith who depend upon that hospital for health care, and whose tax dollars support it.)
Clive, you point out how others often don't understand what Jesus was saying; but while Jesus often labors to try and make things clear to the unbeliever («Oh, you of little faith) or at the very least the author tries to make it clear for us in retrospect (At the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this
case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes
not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to
accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following him.
Just as in the
case of Ephrem, Aphrahat also does
not accept original sin.
I'm sure many people would consider themselves pacifists but say that this is too extreme a definition, one might say for example that pacifism means «attempting to promote peace and making it a goal, but
accepting that war is necessary in some
cases to prevent greater evils,» however the way violence vs. following Jesus is being discussed in this context doesn't allow such concessions.
Azariah who later became Bishop of Dornakal argued that the church in
accepting the position of a communal political minority with special protection would become a static community and it would negate its self - understanding as standing for mission and service to the whole national community, that in any
case the Indian church is
not a single social or cultural community since it consists of people of diverse background, each of whom would have its own political struggle to wage in cooperation with the people of similar background in other religions; and therefore theologically and politically Christians should ask only for religious freedom for its mission and service to all people,
not as a minority right, but as a human right (ref.
This emphasis upon the present and the past among the poor may be born of a lack of hope; but in some
cases it may be a product of an honest cultural difference indicating a more self -
accepting and less acquisitive style of life, a style which should be respected and
not automatically deemed inferior to the more ambitious future - oriented activities of the middle classes.
One may
not accept the premises of Anglican polity, but in this
case the polity has done its work with integrity according to its own self - understanding.
If this aspect differed in kind in the
case of Jesus from every other member of the species man, then in the present state of our knowledge it would seem impossible rightly to describe Jesus as a man.17 It may be the
case that most Christians (and most Christian theologians) in most centuries have
accepted this claim: but most have
not shared either our modern sensitivity to the difference between history and mythology or our concern for the principles of logic.
In the first
case, individuals attempt (or are counseled) to
not accept the reality of their sexual orientation (the idea that «there are no homosexual people — just heterosexual people with a homosexual problem»).