Sentences with phrase «not accept findings»

I do not accept his findings.

Just as scientists would not accept the findings in a scientific paper without seeing the primary data, so should they not rely on Thomson Scientific's impact factor, which is based on hidden data.

Even though the panel concluded that the allegations were unfounded, the GWPF would not accept the findings.

Russia will not accept findings of OPCW inquiry into Salisbury, ambassador signals - Politics live

Krueger and Zhu have not accepted these findings, however.

Not exact matches

If you accept the trends indicating digital is the future, while physical retail is in decline, Canada could find itself shut out entirely — as in, not even the branch plant benefits — from the retail part of the value chain.

Daylle Deanna Schwartz, recommends on the Huffington Post that you use Reality Training, which «means recognizing that if you want to be happy, you need to accept people as they are and find ways to deal with how they are, or don't.»

Verizon Communications has a long - standing interest in buying out its partner, but so far, hasn't found a formula that it can afford and Vodafone will accept.

He feared that he wouldn't live up to their intellectual height and yet soon found that he truly was a peer and his life's course had been permanently altered as society now accepted him as an elite member of the professional class.

You want to have a can - do attitude about work, but maybe 2017 wasn't exactly a shining example of finding a balance between accepting every dictum from on high and coming across as rude, difficult, or just slightly coffee - deprived in these situations.

It's wasteful to struggle with what you can not control: Identify such areas in your business, accept them and tap other resources to find fresh ways to proceed.

Having accepted that it can't satisfy its prospering population alone, China must find a way to feel secure while importing growing quantities of food — the second prong of its strategy.

The women's professional support network Levo recently found that 63 percent of women accept job offers without negotiating their salaries, and another 66 percent don't know how to bring up the topic.

Of course, such a finding was promptly ignored by the media, along with everyone else, because it didn't fit the accepted hardship narrative.

Anecdotes found online at first seem unbelievable: floor staff cheerfully accepting unabashedly damaged returns, no questions asked; Nordstrom employees helping mall shoppers carry purchases from other stores to their cars; and an often - repeated tale about a customer in Anchorage, Alaska, who returned a set of tires to a Nordstrom location — despite the fact that the chain doesn't actually sell tires.

«They're a bunch of people who almost definitely wouldn't have found out about our company, but did so because we started accepting bitcoin.»

A good graph of job distress for the U.S. is here: http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/05/not-yet-worse-than-1982/ What I find exasperating is when economists decide that unemployment is a micro problem, and blame unions for high wages, governments for providing high social wages, and the unemployed for not accepting lower wages.

I found you months back but never commented as usually sites like these don't accept guest comments.

A survey conducted by Glassdoor found 68 percent of women accept the salary they are offered and do not negotiate.

I find myself speaking out more and more about the things I can not accept — like the failed war on drugs, mistreatment of refugees, prejudice against the LGBT community, or the fact that the death penalty still exists despite being proven to not deter crime.

One can literally find hundreds of such statements online by dozens of different analysts in recent years that falsely equate gold as a dead asset, that are in turn, literally accepted and parroted by thousands, if not millions, of other people without any further confirming research.

Nearly four in five (78 per cent) of workers and retirees with pension plans said the availability of pension benefits is a critical factor in deciding whether or not to accept a job, found a survey of 2,750 people in the United States and Canada.

If the Department finds that borrowers with outstanding loans were defrauded, and is only now accepting applications for relief, it should not limit relief based on how long it took to set up a process for applying for relief.

The one exceptional difference between them all is that the Bible clearly explains that the only way to escape eternity in literal hell fire that goes on forever and ever, is to accept the free gift of salvation that is only found in Jesus Christ the creator of all that you can see and can not see.

but you can not blame other as you have the brain to think before you accept anything as you do use your brain / intelectual to go to a good school or find a better job etc...

What I do find odd is that the religious right is so quick to accept a Mormon for his «values» yet they don't seem to understand or care that he doesn't believe as Christians do concerning who Jesus was.

I would not have been able to accept the kind of community that I now find myself so immensely grateful for.

Well seems it was Bob who said that and I explained but you were not satisfied and you then ask me to accept or not as if my decision would make a difference any way read and you will find out what I said here all:

I don't know that there are no gods anywhere in the universe, however I do not find any of the claims of gods here on Earth compelling enough to accept as factual.

My own story can be taken apart theologically using the Bible, or not, it is a journey of searching for reality and finding that I can not change it, I can only accept it, even if it sounds childlike.

Can you imagine the Founding Fathers comtemplating a court telling an employer that he or she had to accept someone who did not want to perform their work duties?

But, if you find an answer not deemed «correct» by your religion, and accept it as the truth, then won't you probably find yourself outside of that faith?

I do not believe in any of the man - made gods, yet I find joy in life with a satisfying career, raising my chiidren, financial security, martial arts, weight lifting, etc.... For some reason you seem unable to accept that as being an alternative.

Yall need to find a new tag line this thinking for ones self just do nt work, To Chose to accept Christ as your Savior is a very personnel choice, It has to come from you and you alone, A silent request for Christ to save your soul, No one made that decision for me.

To understand why Behe's argument is so uncontested in the realm of fact, and yet why so many scientists find the concept of irreducible complexity not only difficult to accept but even impossible to consider, we should start by summarizing the modern understanding of Darwinism, as set out by Richard Dawkins.

We have seen this in many places, from Hindu fundamentalists fighting with national geologists to Christians who can't accept modern findings on hom.ose.xuality or the physical determinism of our brains.

We find that what we can not do through human efforts, can be done by Christ, if we're humble enough to accept it (Remember, the — I believe allegorical — story of the «The Fall» in Genesis was about mankind wanting to do things on its own and be «like God»).

and I find it sad that you can not accept that (YOU don't have to know he exists,, but allow ME the freedom to say such without you being arrogantly assuming)

After 3 months of searching the internet and you tube to decide if I wanted to come back to religion, I finally found someone who preaches from the heart, the way my Mama and Papa used to hear when they went to church, DR John Collins with the Church of Biblical Christians tells it the way it should be plus he does not accept donations, He preaches against todays prosperity preachers, My Papa said hes the only guy he has heard of lately not affraid to tell you what he thinks and use scripture to back him up.

Even Michio kaku have accepted that there is a force that «not known yet» that makes things to work in the universe (read his later findings)

It will not accept solely on the basis of authority but will search for what it finds convincing and persuasive; it will not, however, be fantasy or mere play but will assume that there is something to find out and that if some imagined possibilities fail, others may succeed.

, I am without any hesitation asked for financial support, more support and even more support (OK, I accept that may sometimes be culture — but is not healthy...) and any friendly response from me is cultivated and I suddenly find myself fundraising... — if I would be allowed to spend $ 100K I would rather spend this NOT on evangelism by a Westerner, but also NOT on a local evangelist, but on quality leadership / bible college training for African leadenot healthy...) and any friendly response from me is cultivated and I suddenly find myself fundraising... — if I would be allowed to spend $ 100K I would rather spend this NOT on evangelism by a Westerner, but also NOT on a local evangelist, but on quality leadership / bible college training for African leadeNOT on evangelism by a Westerner, but also NOT on a local evangelist, but on quality leadership / bible college training for African leadeNOT on a local evangelist, but on quality leadership / bible college training for African leaders.

That Murdoch can not find a way to accept this God who sees and seeks (who redeems), but instead embraces an impersonal and probably fictional Good, makes it ironic - perhaps contradictory would not be too strong a word - that she would conclude her book with these words from Psalm 139 (in the Authorized Version, of course):

On the whole, the new rites seem to have been widely accepted, though a tremendous amount of teaching needs to accompany them, and many ministers do not find themselves well equipped to perform this work.

Incidentally, I find that this is a common defense of preachers who apparently are so vulnerable in their preaching that they can not accept critical comments or even honest discussion that represents another point of view.

It is vital that people reject or accept Christianity because of this central message and challenge, and not because of a secondary and unnecessary theological framework which many of us find outdated and incomprehensible.

The hardest thing to accept as a Christian is that being a Christian is like climbing a slippery pole, you are always back sliding... We are all hypocrites, as we are an imperfect man or woman severing a perfect God... I find myself humbled to knowing that there are over 100 sins in the bible way to many to say, and not one is greater then another....

I think what I should have said was that «it» was better than nothing meaning to find out and get some sense of direction to take on whether to accept or not accept the existence of God.

Now regardless of how much truth is found in other faiths, if the sacrifice of the God - man Jesus is absent from their tenets, I can't accept that they are AS valid as Christianity.

I found as many Presbyterians who didn't accept Calvinism as I did Methodists who did, so I survived in the local church during those years.