Sentences with phrase «not accept the theory»

That is why some people of religious faith do not accept the theory of evolution.

Evolution and Creation Dear Fr Editor, Evangelical Creationists, I believe, can not accept the theory of evolution because it appears to conflict with Genesis 1.

Many people, mainly liberals and certainly including Ms. Goodman, don't accept that theory.

Capt. Dennis Adam Mahama (rtd), father of the slain soldier who was attached to the 5th Infantry Battalion (5BN), said he did not accept the theory that his son was new to the route he used for jogging.

What makes a scientist is one driven by curiosity to find out about things and who will follow the scientific method and not become confused over what they know and what they only think they know or know that they don't know and who do not accept theories, claims, or even experimental results without some level of skepticism.

Until someone can explain how that happens and how it can not possibly happen in an equilibrium gravity situation, I can not accept the theory.

Publicly, insurers have not accepted the theory of global warming, which says that the accumulation of greenhouse gases - in part because of activities like burning fossil fuels - is changing weather patterns.

Not exact matches

Oliver Blanchard's theory or Blanchard macroeconomics is an economic theory not well accepted throughout the economic industry.

Difference: atheists that accept evolution, or the theory that all life came from a common ancestor, are more often than not willing to discount that acceptance upon evidence to the contrary.

In much the same way that most Christians would not like to see their pastors discuss «tooth fairy theory» as being a possible path to salvation that's just as good as accepting christ.

You accept only your view and theory but when someone with a different view comes along then all of a sudden you are not as accepting!

Either you accept it as the theory which best explains the every - growing mountain of data across all scientific disciplines for the origins of our species or you do not.

Tom tom: I'm sure you accept many things without absolute proof - for example, you probably accept that matter is made of atoms which you can not see; you probably accept that gravity is not going to disappear tomorrow; you probably believe that testing a theory over and over will yield reliable results.

Unless one accepts some kind of divine intervention, the unified force theory will not be provable.

@david johnson... and non religious... the indifferent probably well over 990,000,000 who do not by their indifference accept atheist theory, but atheists try to claim them to bolster their numbers.Atheism has always been the stuff of frauds.

They've done this before, he claims: Think of «their predecessors who opposed legalizing divorce but lost,» and who then «accepted divorce» in practice if not in theory — for example, by hiring divorcées.

A student with basic training in the sciences knows not to accept something like the «big bang theory», or other science lore.

«We ought in humble submission to accept the real scriptures that god has provided us as they are, rather than ungratefully and stubbornly forcing scripture to be something that it is not because of a theory we hold about what it must and should be.

We concede that not all who doubt the existence of a personal God do so because they accept the theory of evolution, whether the word be restricted to biology or enlarged to its cosmic significance, but we do say, and from experience know, that most modern agnosticism is bound up with those non-theistic philosophies of evolution that stream off from Hegel as their modern fountain - head.

But it is so open to be all - inclusive, all - consuming, like a unifying theory that applies to everyone from atheist to believer in any religious or spiritual tradition, that most wouldn't accept me as a part of their club.

That is basically a theoretical task and hence I can not accept the implication that theory is the anti-thesis of action.

3) True creationism has full respect for the unknown; science by itself is destined to explain everything away even if it is not bona - fide and complete (theory accepted as truth).

You don't BELIEVE theories in science, you accept them or reject them.

While many scientific theories together, like gravity, thermodynamics, relativity, etc. explain much of what we see today, there aren't many generally accepted scientific theories that both explain something equally well and contradict each other.

Many religious folks accept evolutionary theory because they know they can't argue against factual evidence.

I'm not saying I accept his theories, but he pokes enough holes into Darwin's theory and also recognizes that Genesis is a fairy tale.

Although Whitehead did not know much about Marx and accepted the opinion of his theory that was stated by the «learned economists,» much of Marx's outlook can be reconstructed from Whitehead's own writings.

Let's look at the facts, and not blindly accept theory.

@justageeker, 1) I don't think there is an accepted scientific theory of the origin of the universe, yet.

The Big Bang theory and the theory of evolution can not be proven so they are not scientifically proven laws and are accepted on faith as true by some.

If your world view and faith is so fragile that you can't accept even a basic flaw in your religion, you probably have greater problems than just trying to explain away a scientific theory.

Hawking's idea has not been tested much less accepted as a scientific theory.

Given that the scientific method can not reject or even address the relationship between the supernatural and accepted evolution theory the riggers of scientism demand an unfounded belief which discredits the core of atheism.

Inflation is the hot topic in media but it is not even the most widely accepted theory among scientist, and certainly no particular inflation theory is accepted enough to promote the Big Bang to a principle, even with all the media attention it gets.

If you accept the «big bang» theory, where did the stuff that created it come from if not from something greater than it?

If the possibility of the metaphysical project itself is not accepted, then the endeavor to elaborate a metaphysical theory does not seem to be very effective either.

The church recalled it, from the beginning, in dramatic action; and in this it was wise, or fortunate, for a doctrine of «representation,» or «corporate personality,» may well appear abstruse; but those who share the broken bread in Christian fellowship know in themselves what it means, whether or not they could form, or accept, any particular theory about it.

It accepts the idea that there is no pure observation language, but it does not accept the claim that theories are incommensurable.

(2) Theories are not verified or falsified; when data conflict with an accepted theory, they are usually set to one side as anomalies, or else auxiliary assumptions are modified.

An accepted comprehensive theory is overthrown not primarily by discordant data but by an alternative theory; we should visualize not a two - way confrontation of theory and experiment, but a complex confrontation of rival theories and a body of data of varying degrees of susceptibility to reinterpretation.

@Hez - according to a recent Gallup poll, 42 % of Americans do indeed believe the young earth theory, and do not accept either evolution or that the earth is older than 10,000 years.

Then I guess you will not mind the inclusion of the Flying Spaghetti Monster as an alternate theory, The tome has many PH. D.s that have recommended its inclusion in the debate if ID is accepted, such as J. Simon PH.D., Prof Doud Shaw Ph. D., Afshin Beheshti, PH. D., and many more.

A priest whom Kennedy considers to be «fully developed» in psychological terms says that masturbation is not sinful, that he doesn't accept the «theory of mortal and venial sin», and that there is not much guilt or sinfulness associated with sexual misbehaviour.

Even accepting this presumably lesser view, complications are not yet at an end; for it was freely recognized by Hebrew writers that this theory was threadbare; we are told in no uncertain terms that the nation was not of common ancestry.

As Philippe Girard shows in his fine new biography, Louverture accepted the basic validity of both concerns and made it his mission to disprove them, not just in theory but also in practice.

If we accept this understanding of Quantum Theory, we can see our universe as capricious, where on the most fundamental level everyday laws of cause and effect do not apply.

Pair bonding may not be the best or only way to serve our genes but then there is no reason why we have to accept the so called «selfish gene» theory, that we are of value only as gene carriers (the theory popularised by Richard Dawkins in The Selfish Gene.

If you can't accept that you're theory is as flawed as other theories you're just like the close minded Talibans.

That part of the theory I do not accept.

There is the Gap Theory, a concept that also does not accept Darwin's Theory, and there is Theistic Evolution also known as BioLogos.