Sentences with phrase «not accept the truth»

I just hope you «believers» don't destroy the world just because you can not accept the truth.

It is not our fault you can not accept the truth in front of your stupid FACE!

Know you can go back to being foolish and not accepting any truth Christians try to explain to you.

You can see that he will not accept the truth as it is, that he wants God to be other than he is.

I don't accept truth by revelation, and I don't accept divinities.

why don't you accept the truth that when you can not find comfort you seek imaginary solace thru fairy tale god.

Many humans simply can't accept this truth and find they need a christ buddy to hold their hand and whisper lies to them about life everlasting — just to get from day to day.

Some people just will not accept the truth, even when it is staring them in the face, sadly.

Sadly there are still, a minority, but not a tiny one, of Wenger's brainwashees who just won't accept this truth!

Be it out of stupidity or ignorance, those defending him can not and will not accept the truth - Massimo Cellino is no good for a sustainable Leeds United Football Club.

The local authority did not accept the truth of the mother's retraction.

Helen Goudge says in effect the mother is wrong about the father but can not accept that truth.

Not exact matches

«False data» is information that is not factual, but is accepted as truth and passed along like wisdom.

In truth, it's natural and it's healthy to accept sadness and know it won't last forever,» Bernat points out.

The idea that you must first accept as truth something that has not provided adequate evidence to justify that position is, to say the least, intellectually dishonest.

To muslims whether a person accepts Islam or does nt he / she does for his own good in the end or rejects it and is shown the truth in the end and will only be left with regrets.

Despite all its enemies, the Truth of the Bible still persists today, and it penetrates to change the hearts of God's people and will continue to do so until the last day, whether you and pseudoscholars like Baden accept it or not.

And nobody says you can't read them for interest or weighing, but somewhere, somehow, the truth must be asserted, weighed, accepted, rejected.

I spent YEARS of my life trying to prove that Christianity was the ruth, and the conclusion I came to (not at all an easy one, and one that took a long time to accept) was that it was not truth.

While you are right to suggest that the texts must eventually be examined and their truths «asserted, weighed, accepted, [or] rejected,» your particular approach betrays a distrust of the commentary — a distrust not uncommon in Evangelical Christianity (or at the very least Evangelical Christianity in the Americas).

I only tell them the Truth, and it is up to them whether they accept or reject the Truth, although I would feel pity that they won't be with me if they reject.

Telling the truth isn't accepted or wanted by the millions of non-believing, Hedonists who are going to Hell.

It's just that some of us have accepted the fact that Christianity is not the truth, so we've gone elsewhere in our search.

========= @Colin * continued * ================ with the «Big Bang» therory as to why it couldn't be true, yet for the most part everyone accepts it as a truth.

Those who can not see, or accept, likely have anger or pain to release before seeing the Truth.

I think if tf was honest and told me that he can't prove to me his God even though he may know the truth of it in his heart, then I could accept that, and he might also then see he shouldn't be trying so hard to put that cart before the horse regarding these absolute assertions on morality.

so do nt be foolish do nt run from the truth you have now been shown that Jesus loves you and is wants you to live forever with Him if you would just confess your sins ask for forgiveness, accept Jesus as your Lord, Savior.

But, if you find an answer not deemed «correct» by your religion, and accept it as the truth, then won't you probably find yourself outside of that faith?

You keep siting this one and that one but you choose not to accept the truth.

Your problems as it seems to me is that one, you can not accept the Word as Truth, two, you want to fit practices that you rationalize as acceptable but the Bible deems unacceptable as now somehow ok and three that your Jesus is not the Jesus of the Bible.

I am looking for authenticity, relevancy, no ovewhelming bands that take away from the experience of worship, clergy who are willing to answer my hard questions, who understand doubt is a stepping stone to deepening my belief, who accept everyone as Jesus did (and we know Jesus was a rebel who accepted and led all sorts of people), who don't feel the need to try to be hip, who speak about things without inserting politics, who are wiling to trash the temple to bring us back to the truth, who will step out of the box of comfort and be real.

not pulling your head out of your buy - bull and just accepting something written by sheep herders 3000 years ago, then «revised» 2000 years ago, and calling it the truth, when nothing in it can be verified having any connection to a «deity» is ignorant.

atheism tells us to ask questions and not just accept archaic answers as absolute truth.

Instead, I just think, like many atheists, you're just in deep denial about it, and you don't want to accept the truth.

For the faithful in Christ can not accept this view, which holds either that after Adam there existed men on this earth who did not receive their origin by natural generation from him, the first parent of all, or that Adam signifies some kind of multiple first parents; for it is by no means apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled with what the sources of revealed truth and the acts of the magisterium of the Church teach about original sin, which proceeds from a sin truly committed by one Adam, and which is transmitted to all by generation, and exists in each one as his own» -LCB- Humani Generis 37).

«The truth is that ex-gays are not fully accepted in their own religious communities.

We get that, and we accept that as part of the price of not wanting to close off the teaching work of the Holy Spirit, whom Jesus said would lead us into all truth.

The Christian life is not about tolerance... but truth... The Bible is quite specific about what sin is... we must love the sinner but not tolerate the sin... being a Christian requires us to know and speak the truth in love... tolerance means accepting everything without judgment... we can not do that in this society in the midst of moral decay.

But Mr. Morison is not the only first - class mind to come to accept the truth of the objective Resurrection of Christ.

Holy Scripture can not be accepted as revealed truth but must be analyzed as historical data.

This self love is sin.God never forced chaos on us.we gave in to satan's lies about evil being an inherent necessity.Jesus said he was the way, the truth and life.He was the life (love) that everyone craves for, he is the truth which meant that his love was our only need and he exposed the lies of satan that we could attain bliss on subordinating people to our cravings.Sinning people don't accept a God who requires us to renounce ourselves because they are not convinced of God's love being enough for them and they are afraid to destroy their identity and live for the Glory of God.So, upon death, these souls realize that the physical world was just a shadow of God's love (the nature, food etc) and their own lies (violence, self love etc) and realize that love is their only need.They pursue it from other soul beings but are hurt that there's only hate and self love.They are afraid to approach the light because they don't want to renounce their identity as they have not recognized God's love before.

The value of faith stems not from the irrationality of its object but from the humility that is required to see the truth which is accepted, and the courage required to act upon it.

'' Once you remove man's dogmas and get back to the teachings of Jesus Christ» Which is one of man's dogmas... Men wrote the bible.You haven't removed anything, you have accepted one of man's dogmas as if it were truth.

If this means that a normal, sane, rational, loving human being would NOT accept any god that relishes babies being ripped out from their mothers» wombs, who orders his chosen guys to eat barley cake and dung sandwiches, who slaughters infants because their country's king is being a dick, and all the rest of the vile pornographic bloody primitive B.S. in the «Good Book,» but that nevertheless it's the «truth... welcome to it.

Further on Paul warns that destruction is coming for those who did not accept the love of truth for their salvation.

If the traditional formulations of God show him to be the Perfect Good, Absolute Truth and Supreme Being, since goodness, truth and being are positive values, then there should not be too great a difficulty in accepting a formulation of God's eternity as Absolute or Perfect Time, since time is now revealed to us as positive, thanks to the discovery of evoluTruth and Supreme Being, since goodness, truth and being are positive values, then there should not be too great a difficulty in accepting a formulation of God's eternity as Absolute or Perfect Time, since time is now revealed to us as positive, thanks to the discovery of evolutruth and being are positive values, then there should not be too great a difficulty in accepting a formulation of God's eternity as Absolute or Perfect Time, since time is now revealed to us as positive, thanks to the discovery of evolution.

Marx's critique of religion can not be accepted or refuted merely on the basis of religious dogmas, for the dogmas themselves are to be evaluated on the basis of the «truth of man» and not outside it.

So instead of doing some thinking on your own and questioning the utter absurdity of some writer centuries after the death of Christ offering a «prophecy» that is completely open ended and can not be held accountable or reliable in any way, you just accept that as «truth»?

William James wrote that he could not accept any rule of thinking that would keep him from accepting «certain kinds of truths if those kinds of truths were really there.»

The Church is the community of truth and love, and it is the same as in any other loving community of finite human beings: we must always love and accept one another also as men who are strangers to each other and who do not quite understand one another.