Sentences with phrase «not accept your differences»

In a world filled with hate and prejudice, they are feared by those who can not accept their differences.

Not exact matches

According to Kolanovic, the major difference between markets and Uber is that when the going gets tough for a traveler, they can elect not to accept a ride.

God grant me the serenity to accept things I can not change, Courage to change the things I can, And wisdom to know the difference.

Federalism is based on shared principles including respect for the constitution and the division of powers, while being aware that Quebec has not agreed to the Constitution Act, 1982, and accepting that there are differences among the provinces and territories and that governments may have different policy priorities and preferences.

Difference: atheists that accept evolution, or the theory that all life came from a common ancestor, are more often than not willing to discount that acceptance upon evidence to the contrary.

Why can't you just live your lives and accept differences, if there is an Allah won't he deal with it at judgment?

The one exceptional difference between them all is that the Bible clearly explains that the only way to escape eternity in literal hell fire that goes on forever and ever, is to accept the free gift of salvation that is only found in Jesus Christ the creator of all that you can see and can not see.

Well seems it was Bob who said that and I explained but you were not satisfied and you then ask me to accept or not as if my decision would make a difference any way read and you will find out what I said here all:

I can't accept the logic that because things that are wrong are worse «over there» than they are «here» that a qualitative difference exists.

The only difference is the «degree of wackiness» — some supernatural beliefs and practices are generally accepted by society and a few are not, but none have a rational basis in the 21st century.

«God grant me the serenity to accept the things I can not change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.»

They have some differences but one major similarity is that they do not accept the Pope.

The same reasons BC condemns the readers and contributors to this forum — that we think, question, use our own God - given intelligence and reasoning skills, don't accept the easy answers, and are accepting of differences which create no harm — are the very things that make that notion quite bizarre.

The problem is that a basic tenet of classical liberalism — a tenet generally accepted in the Western world by «liberals,» as well as by many «conservatives» — is that differences regarding fundamental principles of human nature and morality are not a threat to social and political life.

God grant me the serenity To accept the things I can not change, Courage to change the things I can And wisdom to know the difference.

They do not accept the clause «hate the sin but not the sinner» they do not see there is any difference

That is the difference between a saved person going to Heaven and a person who is not saved and is going to Hell, Have you accepted Jesus or rejected Him.

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,

The difference here of course has nothing to do with trustung what «men» have written, it has to do with faith in whatever diety you believe... If you accept that there is a diety responsible for inspiring someone to write about them then really it is not the person writing but the diety writing through them... so your argument from that perspective is moot...

However, granted the difference in their use of «internal,» one can not say that Santayana rejects Whitehead's view that the relation is internal; he certainly accepts that it is intimate.)

It's funny how people have become so brainwashed into accepting what is wrong but are against what is right, it's also funny how people can't tell the difference between difference of opinion and hatred.

Certainly we can not maintain this if we accept a metaphysical doctrine that refuses to admit any difference in kind between a living mind and a mechanical structure.

This emphasis upon the present and the past among the poor may be born of a lack of hope; but in some cases it may be a product of an honest cultural difference indicating a more self - accepting and less acquisitive style of life, a style which should be respected and not automatically deemed inferior to the more ambitious future - oriented activities of the middle classes.

But the third source of Tillich's thought, the tradition of German idealist philosophy, gives greater emphasis to impersonal conceptions and is more evident in his systematic discussion of the doctrine of God.33 He does not accept Hegel's vision of participation in the all - inclusive Absolute in which all differences are overcome in harmonious synthesis.

If this aspect differed in kind in the case of Jesus from every other member of the species man, then in the present state of our knowledge it would seem impossible rightly to describe Jesus as a man.17 It may be the case that most Christians (and most Christian theologians) in most centuries have accepted this claim: but most have not shared either our modern sensitivity to the difference between history and mythology or our concern for the principles of logic.

In verse 65 it also does not make any difference WHETHER OR NOT a person has the inherent - free - will ability to accept or reject, the person can not come to Christ if God has not granted him to be called and drawn to Chrinot make any difference WHETHER OR NOT a person has the inherent - free - will ability to accept or reject, the person can not come to Christ if God has not granted him to be called and drawn to ChriNOT a person has the inherent - free - will ability to accept or reject, the person can not come to Christ if God has not granted him to be called and drawn to Chrinot come to Christ if God has not granted him to be called and drawn to Chrinot granted him to be called and drawn to Christ.

I think the big difference is, like you intimated, the signs of God you said you experienced, you decided they were not real signs ----- me, I accept them [my signs] as real.

I agree with what you have written from the biblical perspective and would like to take it further in the sense that that we are all sinners whether fornicators liars homosexuals the difference is that if we decide to follow Jesus we not only repent of our sin but we turn away from continuing to sin Remenber the woman caught in adultery Jesus said go and sin no more that applys to all of us that have accepted Jesus.But unless we die to our desires we cant live for him.brentnz

Why not accept the situation now for what it is and join the many other non-believers who are actually trying to make a positive difference in the world, instead of just trying uselessly to pray away our current crises?

Those who are wise in their own minds (whether they are «educated» or not makes no difference) often depend upon their own wisdom; whereas those who are know they have much to learn (that is, they are «babes») are willing to accept what Jesus reveals to them about the character and nature of God.

Now i can accept a difference of option but when that's turned into making things personal I can't take you seriously.

Let us pray for «courage to change what we can change, serenity to accept what we can not change, and wisdom to know the difference.»

The attacks have been condemned by the Islamic community repeatedly and if we are to move forward as a community we must learn from each other and accept differences, not be afraid of them.

The only difference between Christians and non-Christians is that Christians have accepted and are called to testify to what God has done for all humanity, and non-Christians have not yet accepted.

Is it really necessary today to remind intelligent people, whether Christians or not, that there is a difference between recognizing that such a view was held by Socrates and accepting it, between recognizing a hope as primitive Christian and sharing it oneself?

However, his reformulation of relativity was not accepted by physicists, no doubt because he was never able to show any confirmable difference between the predictions of observable fact derived from his theory and that of Einstein.

Science will gladly accept any evidence for there being gods, but the real difference here is that there just isn't any evidence to support the belief that any actual gods exist in the first place.

His naive use of class differences to identify excellence («Ministers of the better class are not satisfied to accept the rural churches») and his explicit call for theological schools to train persons to minister specifically to the rich suggest that this interest in theology, which is otherwise so thoroughly underemployed in Harper's proposed reform of theological schooling, is vulnerable to ideological misuse as a «cover» that at once obscures and legitimates an underlying concern to secure the churches» social status.

Basic differences between Mill and Hartshorne are to be found, not in their principles of morality, but in the reasons each offers for accepting a utilitarian moral theory.

«God» (take it or leave it) grant me the serenity to accept the things I can not change, the power to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.

Philastrius of Brescia (d. 397) regarded Hebrews as written by Paul but not canonical; on the other hand, African synods held in 393 and 397 accepted the canonicity of «thirteen letters of the apostle Paul» and «of the same, one to the Hebrews», thus maintaining a distinction without a difference.

We don't want to accept the true that Wegner is not anymore someone who can make difference.

But you're going to have to accept that others have differing opinions even as they, too, enjoy and are entertained by the moments that make for highlight clips, and these differences, unless clearly presented otherwise, have everything to do with baseball, and are not because there's an animus against his ethnicity.

Jon Fox, I had previously decided to accept our differences and not get involved with you anymore as we were just going round in circles.

As for his sale, if we get a half decent offer from City (frankly I don't think they need him, or his sulks) then we should accept it and move on, hes not going to make a difference to the destination of the title, and the way he's playing for us it's not going to hurt too much if he goes.

So as the old adapted Serenity Prayer goes: Change the things that can be changed (Wenger & players) Accept the things we can not change (Kronke & Sons) And have the wisdom to know the difference.

Around the end of November he started to feature (from the bench initially) for the first team in Premiere League games.This came as a result of injuries I know but everyone had accepted he had worked hard to get himself back and he was making a difference to the team in midfield (not hard I do appreciate given the form of Xhaka and Ramsey at the time.

Loyal comments BUT they choose to ignore that against better teams than inept Everton those costly mistakes you think we «should not focus on», make the difference between really top sides and nearly ones who have talent but accept constant faults.

The difference between a Liverpool, Manchester United or Chelsea supporter is they don't accept what the media always throws down their throat.

But with us not playing since last weekend and not having to travel for, it is hard to accept why this would make any difference.