Sentences with phrase «not accepted the practice»

Although most school - age children who suck their thumbs do so in private (they become aware that thumbsucking is not an accepted practice), there is a small percentage of children who continue sucking during the day.

Mayor Bill de Blasio said Tuesday he doesn't accept the practice and said the city will «deal with it very aggressively,» but didn't say how.

In the scientific community, anonymous hatchet jobs are generally not accepted practice.

The honourable mentions are random capitalized terms, acronyms / short forms with no description (w.r.t.), statements of work that are replete with the vendor's marketing blather (i.e., «we are a group of highly skilled professionals who pride ourselves in successfully delivering complex projects with multiple technologies») and SOWs that reference past dates (I like science fiction as much as anyone else, but time travel is still not an accepted practice).

Not exact matches

As a result, 47 % of the practices in the large metros, and 40 % of those in the mid-sized cities, don't accept Medicaid patients.

First of all, I believe most retail investors do understand and accept the concept of asset allocation, even if they don't actually practice it.

Regulators could review our practice of taking reservation payments and, if the practice is deemed to violate applicable law, we could be required to pay penalties or refund the reservation payments that we have received for vehicles that are not immediately available for delivery, to stop accepting additional reservation payments, to restructure certain aspects of our reservation program, and potentially to suspend or revoke our licenses to manufacture and sell our vehicles.

Aldi's business model is based on low prices, which it achieves by practices such as stocking fewer items, eschewing national brands for cheaper generic labels and not accepting credit cards.

Well, yeah... and I mean if what someone is really trying to achieve with this is to reduce practices that in any way, shape or form could indicate that someone bears them or their faith ill will... I don't think publicly humiliating people who would take the time to look up your dead ancestor's name and then take the time to drive to a temple and then get immersed in water on their behalf so that they (by their belief) have the option to accept your religion post mortem is really misguided and contrary to the spirit of freedom of religion in what it advocates.

The Report criticises us either for failing to follow the Church's Policies, or for not following what was accepted as good practice by Child Protection Agencies.

As for racial discrimantion, it might not be immoral in the bible because that was accepted practice back then just the same as it's completely acceptable in parts of the world still.

The only difference is the «degree of wackiness» — some supernatural beliefs and practices are generally accepted by society and a few are not, but none have a rational basis in the 21st century.

Oh yeah, by the way... I hope your ass is at work bright and early on Christmas morning becuase if you really had the nads to practice what you preach you wouldn't accept gifts, give gifts, or take the day off on Christmas.

Church leaders stopped its practice, expelling from the Church those who wouldn't accept the Church leadership.

Your problems as it seems to me is that one, you can not accept the Word as Truth, two, you want to fit practices that you rationalize as acceptable but the Bible deems unacceptable as now somehow ok and three that your Jesus is not the Jesus of the Bible.

They've done this before, he claims: Think of «their predecessors who opposed legalizing divorce but lost,» and who then «accepted divorce» in practice if not in theory — for example, by hiring divorcées.

If that is NOT what you are suggesting, please explain in what ways — how and where — you would accept the «free practice of religion» anywhere other than in a religious building or at home.

To develop such a morality, emphasizes Smedes, «is not to accept homosexual practices as morally commendable.

Supporters of George W. Bush's faith - based initiatives plan, which would shift some of the responsibility and funding for social services onto religious organizations, often stress that the plan isn't radically new but rather an extension of accepted practices.

They argue that medicine is a «monopoly service,» fully funded and regulated by the state, and that professionals can not enjoy the benefits of this monopoly unless they accept — without exception — the «scope of professional practice» set by government regulation.

Panthrotheism does not discriminate or believe the bible is wrong, in analogy no one can claim that our human ancestors are wrong because they were naked or ate raw meats.We have now to accept that we are evolving.What is important that we survive.and still love each other in general despite conflicts.No one is wrong in believing and practicing any religion that is pro life.Some people thinks that any contadiction to classical faith is wrong, un aware that humans survive the trials in history was because of change and adaptation, in short evolution.its not anti religiom

for every priest that violated his vows and the trust of his parishioners there will someday be a reckoning... true the head always suffers for his members that go astray... but the Brits don't understand the Catholic church if they think that we are going to accept practicing man and females gays into the priesthood and except the pope to issue condoms for the prevention of AID they got something else coming... If the Brits want to live in a perverse society where every thing goes that their moral problem!!

IE «willful» I will not go into deep explanation but simply stated, this passage is not speaking to people who commit sins on purpose but to people who practice sin as an accepted way of life.not people like you and I and the apostle Paul who says in Phillipians 312Not that I have already obtained it or have already become perfect, but I press on so that I may lay hold of that for which also I was laid hold of by Christ Jesus.

So maybe the church my friend attended in the 60's that had vending machines in the lobby, where one could buy sodas and crackers or cookies, which were used for «Communion», wasn't any more «incorrect» in the way they did «Communion» than is the more accepted modern practice!

Not all born of human parents, not all who share in the bond of human generations over time, will seem equal in dignity — if and when those practices become accepted among Not all born of human parents, not all who share in the bond of human generations over time, will seem equal in dignity — if and when those practices become accepted among not all who share in the bond of human generations over time, will seem equal in dignity — if and when those practices become accepted among us.

The point of the present analysis is that divorce ought not to be accepted as a normal and proper practice, for the benefit of couples who no longer satisfy each other.

These practices and elements have become so normal and accepted within Christianity that we believe they are «from Jesus» or «by the Holy Spirit» when they are not.

But just as equal opportunities within a society are unlikely to become reality without general access to high quality education, so free trade will not in practice be generally accepted, especially among the poorer countries, until the huge discrepancies between nations in technical and commercial skills are diminished.

Along the same lines, Sapontzis argues that animals» intentional and sincere, kind and courageous actions are moral actions, for they accord with accepted moral norms, and we do not require demonstrations of moral principle in everyday human moral practice (AAMB 51 - 2).

The mores have made social drinking a widely accepted contemporary practice, and not all Christians hold it to be wrong.

The releasing strength and power of the real Redeemer Jesus Christ we receive by the sacramental baptism (Churches believing in sacramental baptism do not practice rebaptism, but accept the one Holy Baptism and a church member can shift the church without being baptized again).

As Philippe Girard shows in his fine new biography, Louverture accepted the basic validity of both concerns and made it his mission to disprove them, not just in theory but also in practice.

But Jesus was more accepting of women, children, aliens, beggars, leppers and even sexual minorities than OT practice, which I think represents a greater inclusiveness which should lead us to believe that love / protection /» rights» be extended to these vulnerable groups and not just the priveledge adult male population.

It can not be denied that a similar belief underlies the practice of sacrifice in the Old Testament — the belief that God will accept the life of a substitute when the offerer's own life is forfeit.

The authors would still allow doctors to decline to assist suicides — for now — but only because that practice is not yet accepted generally within the medical community.

Within a local area, numbers of churches will tacitly accept an ecumenical answer by simply pointing out that «signing» for the deaf is carried on at one or more specific churches in the city, and deaf members in a church where such signing is not practiced are in effect invited to the church where it is, even though that church may be of another denomination.

It is quite staggering how many students do not understand some of the most simple doctrines and liturgical practices and, indeed, do not accept, or feel uncomfortable with the Church's teaching on moral issues.

Worship, to one who does not accept its bases in belief, is apt to seem more like a cultic practice nurtured in mythology than a life - renewing force.

Sometimes that is literally a theatre of war, but some also speak of more nuanced divisions: such as «The House of Truce», «House of Calm» — non-Muslim territories where Muslims are free to practice — and «The House of Invitation» where Islam is not yet fully accepted but is in the process of being introduced — ie.

But within the boünds of Christianity, which you are free to accept or deny, it is quite clear that homôsëxuality must not be practiced.

If it is desirable for Harvard Law School to reject every white applicant whose credentials fall within a certain range while accepting every similarly qualified black applicant, why not apply this practice to the entire range of applicants, and reject all whites for a period of several years?

This constituency includes persons now repelled by organized religion because they can not accept certain positions (such as opposition to evolutionary theory or to birth - control practice) which they have been exposed to in some churches and which they assume characterize all churches.

By the way - Hippies and New Agers - the Dali Lama, whos religion and philosophy and practices like mediation and meatless diet, Yoga, etc — you all have embraced — clearly states abortion is killing and not accepted by the Buddist religion.

i think mormon politician should stop telling people to accept them but rather run their campaign.i do nt care how mormon you are, as long as you do nt practice poligarmy in my state.

Jesus did not practice inclusion to the extent of accepting every person who came to him.

I am going to weigh in, being a catholic and the whole shabang... First of all this is not infringing on anyone's right to practice their religion... Requiring insurance companies to provide contraception for women does not mean the woman has to use it or purchase it... Catholic hospitals take federal funds for their patients, therefore they are not exempt from employment laws... If the Catholic Diocese doesn't want to provide the insurance claiming religious beliefs, then they can no longer accept federal funded patients... They also know that they will be subjected to discrimination lawsuits based hiring and religious discrimination — non-catholics work there, and therefore are being denied healthcare due to catholic beliefs... Majority if not all Catholic women do, have, or had used contraception in their lifetime... God does not nor does the bible say anything about contraception, since it had not been invented yet — so this is a man - made law, made by a bunch of men, who have never had a menstrual cycle — and the pain that comes with it....

We have already noted earlier that when compared with the commonly accepted religious practices of the day, the Christian community of faith took on an everyday, almost secular appearance, not unlike such a contemporary movement as the Rotarians.

If we can't accept ppl for who they are, regardless of their practices, just like Jesus did for us, then what is the point of our religion?

Since the practice of homosexuality is incompatible with Christian teaching, self - avowed practicing homosexuals are not to be accepted as candidates, ordained as ministers, or appointed to serve in the United Methodist Church.

It is based upon the same science practices that have led to the gasoline engine, modern medicine, nuclear power, computers, etc. b. Although people believe in some aspects of scientific ideas that are conjectural, the extent that those will be fully accepted will be based upon testing and observations, not faith or dogma.