Sentences with phrase «not achieving nothing»

As always we are just one injury away for not achieving nothing else but what WENGER has got us use to.....

Not exact matches

When the right thoughts and actions are combined there is nothing you can not achieve.

Great design is achieved, not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take way.

If the mining companies are doing nothing to help local communities other than paying wages and are not making provision to rehabilitate land after mining activities, etc., then these levies are justified if they are used to achieve these aims.

Oddly enough I tend to thank only those people that actually helped me achieve what I want in life, not something that did nothing.

We must not be defeatist and cry that the whole Church is heading for disaster, but neither should we have the childish idea of a crazy avant - garde that the Church should move ever faster, that what has been achieved is nothing and that everything that is new in the Church is but a modest beginning leading to unheard - of things.

Atheism offers nothing to me, it never has and never will, it doesn't make me feel good or comfort me, it's not there for me when I'm sick or ill, it won't intervene in my times of need or protect me from hate, it doesn't care if I fail or succeed, it won't wipe the tears from my eyes, it does nothing when I have no where to run, it won't give me wise words or advice, it has no teaches for me to learn, it can't show me what's bad or nice, it's never inspired or excited anyone, it won't help me fulfill all my goals, it won't tell me to stop when I'm having fun, it's never saved one single soul, it doesn't take credit for everything I achieve, it won't make me get down on bended knee, it doesn't demand that I have to believe, it won't torture me for eternity, it won't teach me to hate or despise others, it won't tell me what's right or wrong, it can't tell nobody not to be lovers, it's told no one they don't belong, it won't make you think life is worth living, it has nothing to offer me, that's true, but the reason Atheism offers me nothing is because I've never asked it to, Atheism offers nothing because it doesn't need to, Religion promises everything because you want it to, You don't need a Religion or to have faith, You just want it because you need to feel safe, I want to feel reality and nothing more, Atheism offers me everything that Religion has stolen before.

He stands before God as a sinner, that is, his sin has not relative but absolute character; he is condemned, and can appeal to nothing which he has been or has achieved.

He concludes his critical investigation in The Historical Jesus: The Life of a Mediterranean Jewish Peasant with the astonishing sentence «If you can not believe in something produced by reconstruction, you may have nothing left to believe in...» [5] Yet no critical reconstruction of any kind can achieve a representation of the original reality of Jesus» career beyond the realm of probability.

Fanatics are impervious to reasoning and will stop at nothing to achieve their ends, passionately believing them to be not their own ends but God's.

I don't necessarily believe that the current system is beyond reform, there are some positive movements in this direction, but nothing short of a whole change of perception and thought is necessary; not something that can be achieved with just a little nudge and encouragement.

Furthermore, that aim either would not be achieved by God (in which case God could not yet be prehended), or it would be, but then there would be nothing to grow.

Media Statement 10 June, 2015 Warnings on soft drink ads don't make people healthy Responding to San Francisco's decision to impose health warnings on ads for sugar sweetened drinks, Australian Beverages Council CEO Geoff Parker said: «The introduction of health warnings on soft drink ads will achieve nothing.

u cant can u bcoz it achieved nothing giroud is not good enuff for this club u just want to impress people hy praising him and bscking jim up and it just shows ur lack of football knowledge..

We need a manager with some ambition and not someone who is paid huge sums of money to achieve nothing.

Wrote here in the summer after the market closed that if you sack only Wenger and not the whole leadership it will achieve absolutely nothing.

It got so bad that Fernando decided that he'd prefer to do the Indy 500 than race at Monaco, and on a few occasions even retired a car that had nothing wrong with it because he couldn't be bothered to drive around near the back with no hope of achieving anything meaningful.

These players must be made aware and shaken a bit to wake the fu ck up because one good season is nothing (see Ramsey or Cazorla) if you don't build up on what you achieved.

he was also not slow in Bringing back former manager Mourhino - a man with a proven pedigree and understanding of the modern game — Abramovich takes no prisoners he wants to win — While Chelsea continue to sweep aside all in their path, Abramovich stops at nothing to achieve football success!

I don't think you're quite grasping that Sanchez is leaving on a FREE transfer, so you're right his situation is nothing like the other players you mentioned because unlike them, he knows he can just walk to City next season independent of what numbers he achieves this season.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Wenger manage to please them by spending few money and still making the club have profit.Imagine all those clubs outside the top 4 crying for the CL place as there is so much money involved, that why Wenger is untouchable by the board.He is over achieving compare to what he spend and he does not spend in order to win but to compete.Don t come with your crap talk about Ozil and Sanchez, their buy did not solve nothing of the serious needs of the team, it was Hollywood signing just to woaw around people and supporters.

Why not be positive, instead or peddling the same old rubbish that thus far has achieved nothing?

You have hit the nail on the head, people say that things don't make sense at arsenal, as long as kroenke is at arsenal we will achieve nothing, the sooner we the arsenal fans realise this man will destroy arsenal, then we may be able to save our great club by forcing him to sell his shares.

Last night was a disgusting display and Ill tell you why I think this, Since the Swansea game last week its become highly apparent that for teams who are looking to get a point OR beat us the tactic is simple, park the bus and then get us on the break, Last night our team SHOULD have been steamrollering to try and achieve 2nd spot, but the fight has gone because they knew a point would suffice, the season ai nt over until the last game and whilst 2nd spot means nothing with regards to trophies it means everything with regards to pride and bragging rights for the fans.

Wenger won't win you the league... I've seen Arsenal play like this before... there is just nothing to expect other than perhaps what we achieved the last two years... i'm being realistic Wenger OUT or NOT.

which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course

So, if you can keep everything that happened during this transfer window aside and support ur team - mates hunger for success, winning mentality, teamwork and above all top 4 ambition, there's nothing you can't achieve @ liverpool.

They make me realize that there's nothing in the world that I can't achieve as long as they are by my side.

Isn't greater home - ownership the best opportunity for people to escape state dependency and invest in a simple, low - risk asset over a life - time that will allow people who started with nothing to achieve their goal of total financial independence?

Here's the issue: the entire four - day message of the Convention was not about expanding Trump's base of support among minorities or women (the 2016 GOP platform says nothing about providing «equal pay for equal work»; it was not about proposing substantive solutions to problems facing the nation; it was not even about making amends with traditional conservatives and moderate Republicans to achieve party unity (the Republican governor of Ohio, John Kasich, the Bush family, and all former Republican nominees for president, except one, did not attend).

«But the fact is that whatever I do or don't achieve in politics, nothing matters as much as my family.

But Times columnist Philip Collins, a former speech writer for Tony Blair, said it made no sense for Ed Miliband to back a general strike, it would not get backing from the general public and it would achieve nothing.

A further unrealistic attitude which both political leaders and the public encourage with equal enthusiasm is an exaggerated notion of what any government can achieve so that nothing unfortunate happens for which the public will not blame the government and for which politicians are not prepared to assume responsibility or at least, if in opposition, to blame the government.

Nothing we can not achieve in Essex and East Anglia, in England and the whole country beyond.»

The former Tory MP, who triggered the vote after defecting from the Tories, said there was «nothing we can not achieve» if Ukip was able to extend its appeal to «all Britain and all Britons».

If we stay true to that there is nothing that we can not achieve.

Theoretically, there's nothing being achieved here that couldn't have been done with town hall posters, letters and a few phone calls, but the ability of Twitter to communicate with a staggering number of people instantly allows it to galvanise popular movements - and then coordinate them - with a speed and efficiency which would have been unthinkable just three years ago.

I wasn't a dangerous person who needed to be kept away from people and so the prison sentence achieved nothing for society.

«Half women shortlists may not increase gender diversity and do nothing to achieve social diversity Main David Cameron responds to your concerns...»

It's ridiculous to think the march achieved nothing just because Ed didn't come out well from it.

You could argue that having achieved nothing in two years as an MP is not as bad as having achieved nothing in * thirty * - two years as an MP.

He was an irresistible force and it seemed there was nothing he could not achieve simply by applying the power of his will.

But it shows the astronauts didn't die for nothing — some science was achieved,» he told New Scientist.

If Google's Clips camera achieves nothing more than throwing those questions into sharper focus, its invention won't have been in vain.

There is nothing that one needs to achieve in the Tantric path, nothing that one isn't already.

You have nothing to lose and so much to gain, so don't be reluctant to change — try to experiment, learn and search for better ways to target your chest until you achieve the desired results or perhaps even more!

It's not even something you can be «good at» or «bad at» because there is no final goal to achieve, nothing to accomplish.

When you set your mind on a goal you so desperately want to achieve, there is nothing that can stop you, except... not knowing where to start.

Or framed for your post: There's nothing wrong with your microfarming, but you certainly don't need a microfarm to achieve giant reductions in disease risk — which comes with simply eating a whole plant food based (WPFB) diet, whether organic or not.