Christianity... and the Pope,,, are
not against Capitalism, only the social ills that can result from unbridled greed... when money becomes a false god... or «the Precious» (Lord of the Rings).
Not exact matches
These are to be distinguished from fraudulent pretenders to the title such as Colonel Qaddafi's Popular Democratic Republic, the so - called Democratic Republics of the old USSR, etc.) The sociologist Peter Berger,
against his own earlier predilections, has shown in The Capitalist Revolution that among all existing nations
capitalism is a necessary (but
not sufficient) condition for democracy.
I think many think Jesus is preaching
against capitalism when he speaks of taking care of the poor but I don't see that.
Please provide me some scripture references that speak
against capitalism,
not just charity in general.
In the struggle
against such a system, what is being proposed as an alternative is
not the socialist system, which in fact turns out to be state
capitalism, but rather a society of free work, of enterprise and of participation.
It is
not only in their prejudices
against capitalism that the liberation theologians have been found wanting.
When this is understood, Hart's litany of
capitalism's supposed abuses — pollution, the confiscation of property, unsafe working conditions, etc. — can be seen
not as the inevitable result of unchecked market behavior but as a profound betrayal of the very taboo
against the initiation of force that
capitalism depends on.
The grim reality is that Corporate America is very much
not concerned with giving; in fact the very practice goes
against just about everything
capitalism stands for.
We must
not only alter our personal life style but also struggle
against the polluting systems of corporate
capitalism that proliferate warfare and waste.
Apart from a general critique
against financial
capitalism and
against the inability of current policies to counteract it, it has
not really proposed an alternative vision or utopia likely to mobilize numerous citizens in the long - term and to lead to effective transformations.
The significance of this change of direction is difficult to overstate; for decades Labour had accepted the inequality intrinsic to
capitalism as a brute fact — something to be worked around,
not worked
against.
Isn't this precisely the sort of ludicrous broken -
capitalism nonsense we should fight
against every day, tooth and nail???????
National Socialism was staunchly
against capitalism, and whilst it didn't oppose privately owned companies (unlike its «cousin» / rival, communism), it did dictate that everyone (every German in «nazism's» case) was equal and was required to help one another and work for their nation and fellow Germans rather than personal gain.
There is an urgency to go back to basics and talk to each other... It's
not communism
against capitalism anymore.
Here the resistance
against capitalism does
not manifest itself over a complex emotional relationship with the middle class, but rather through being directly opposed to
capitalism and demanding a more just and equal world.
You are running
against walls (me too ^ ^), things will
not change until
capitalism broke down.
He was especially concerned with the fact that most people, including many socialists in his time, in rebelling
against the evils of
capitalism, tended to picture the future in terms that were
not that far removed from many of the worst, most environmentally and humanly destructive, aspects of
capitalism itself.
Against the establishment wisdom, Minqi Li argues in this provocative and startling book that far from strengthening
capitalism, China's full integration into the world capitalist system will, in fact and in the
not too distant future, bring about its demise.
But the obstacle is the real existing political economy of
capitalism, and
not the alleged technical problems cited by Cox, which are misleadingly used as ammunition
against the feasibility of the imperative need to facilitate a rapid 100 % global renewable wind / solar energy transition.
And
not just any old capitalist, either... Klein, in her argument
against capitalism chooses to use the words of a multi-multi-multi millionaire!
Also, while I think that science and technological progress and
capitalism have done a pretty good job of avoiding permanent resource scarcity so far (eg, the Simon / Ehrlich bet), I don't think we should assume that they can do so forever, or that economic growth will continue at the current several percent rate forever - they might, betting
against human ingenuity is always dangerous, but a good, robust strategy would take into account the possibility that there might be limits to growth even if it is difficult to pinpoint any one given constraint.
«Green socialism» is about taking a stand
against —
not for a long time realized — «green
capitalism.»