Sentences with phrase «not against judges»
I'm not against judges being Masons.
https://parentalalienation-pas.com/ Not exact matches
After noticing that the curtains separating judges from applicants didn't help much to solve the problem, they eventually isolated the reason: the sound of the women applicant's heels against the hardwood floors of the audition room effectively unblinded the audition.
More and more, people are judging the value of the products they buy against not one, but two currencies: money, and the effort it's going to take to get the damned things home.
BISMARCK, N.D. — A North Carolina - based private security firm hired by Texas - based pipeline developer Energy Transfer Partners won't be banned from North Dakota, though a judge is still weighing whether TigerSwan operated illegally in the state during protests against the Dakota Access oil pipeline and might be subject to fines.
She also listed several of Trump's most controversial statements, beginning with his recent claim that the judge presiding over a lawsuit against Trump University can't properly do his job because he is «Mexican.»
More times than not, though, my coach steers me away from judging myself against others.
A judge dismissed one civil suit against him, ruling that Zhang was not responsible for the claimant's losses from the scheme.
Under a judge's order, GM is shielded from legal claims from before it emerged from bankruptcy in 2009, and company officials wouldn't say Thursday whether they will use that protection against death and injury lawsuits.
In fact, in December 2017 a Virginia district court judge ruled against a female plaintiff in a lawsuit alleging sex discrimination, sexual harassment, and retaliation against defense contractor BAE Systems, in part, because she «did not take advantage of BAE's harassment reporting procedures of which she was well aware.»
In the GQ story, Ioffe wrote that «Melania's caviar - infused anti-aging creams haven't sold as well, though a federal judge ruled in her favor in a lawsuit she filed against its promoters.»
A federal judge has rejected Massachusetts» challenge to new Trump administration rules that would allow more companies to not provide insurance plans that cover birth control; previous decisions by other judges in California and Pennsylvania went the other way, issuing injunctions against the new birth control rules.
The fact that the bankruptcy judge does not recognize this is an important point against them.
Also the article read like pure comedy gold, I'm surprised the judge didn't file for misconduct against apple's lawyer.
Like it or not, Finance Minister Joe Oliver's April budget has now become the fiscal «benchmark» against which their policy platforms will be judged in terms of their commitments to maintain a balanced budget.
If there is a danger that monetary policy will be seen as «too difficult», there is also a risk that too much will be expected of it or, at least, that its success or failure will be judged against an impossibly - high standard: it can't cure the business cycle; it can't reduce inflation costlessly; and it can't be operated with surgical precision.
Judge Randolph Moss, U.S. District judge for the District of Columbia, heard oral arguments for close to three hours Thursday in the first hearing against DOL's rule, but did not immediately render a deciJudge Randolph Moss, U.S. District judge for the District of Columbia, heard oral arguments for close to three hours Thursday in the first hearing against DOL's rule, but did not immediately render a decijudge for the District of Columbia, heard oral arguments for close to three hours Thursday in the first hearing against DOL's rule, but did not immediately render a decision.
Also March 20, 2018: New York state Judge Jennifer Schecter rules against Trump's lawyers» motion to dismiss the defamation case by Summer Zervos, citing the Supreme Court's ruling in Clinton v. Jones that presidents are not immune from civil suits.
According to Reuters, Judge Kimba Wood issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the Alibabacoin Foundation, and ordered the defendants (including ABBC Foundation's CEO Jason Daniel Paul Phillip and CTO Hassan Abbas) to explain to the court «why an order should not be issued granting a preliminary injunction,» which would prohibit the defendants» usage of the Alibaba trademarks anywhere in the United States.
Imagine you looked at your performance after a set number of trades or a set period of time but did not have a trading strategy to judge it against.
A judge has ruled that Uber can't present a key argument in its defense against an Alphabet lawsuit.
I'm not judging against any of those who believe.
«And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.»
But the occasional sensible viewpoint helps us all not to judge a point of view simply because of bias against an individual.
But aren't we warned not to judge because our judgements will be used against us?
Why he didn't speak out against the practice is because he did not come to judge the world, he came to save it.
I was taught that there were only 2 sins the Spirit could not forgive despair and presumption: presuming to know the mind of God and presuming to judge for him surely is a sin against the Spirit, your sin, and you should perhaps ponder your own salvation, not someone else's.
«4 And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.»
The majority of christians have no idea about their faith or what it is to be christian, you see them spout nonsense from a bible they have never read and judge or even hate others who do not believe their beliefs, all the while not knowing they are going against its teachings.
I'm so tired of pastors want to tell their people don't vote, I don't believe in this, or that look who are we to judge anyman if he gay that's between him and his God, what about the thief, liar, cheater, should we stand against them to?
His only judgments came against the religious leaders who were judged not for their sins but, because they lived in continual judgment of any who did not act just like they did and because they failed to extend grace and love to those who needed it the most.
Ms Judge's motion stated the proposal was not for or against abortion but sought to protect individuals who were seeking an abortion.
I Am a girl, 15 from Illinois, and i plan on wrestling next year, and i wish that guys wouldn't forfeit against girls, because if they are on a wrestling team they are obviously there because they WANT to wrestle and compete, however if the guy is not comfortable wrestling with me (a girl) i wont judge him in anyway, its your own choice and i agree
It's God's place to judge people, not mankind against each other.
As I said, while I may not agree with your lifestyle I will not judge you because God warns against it.
The judge was clearly prejudice against the athiest for insulting religion and made up his mind not to give a fair verdict.
How many Clam marches in black or Jewish areas have been UPHELD as protected speech, NOT provocative?!! This is just one judge's choice to strike back against atheism.
Jeremiah 18:21, 23) A notable amount of praying in the Old Testament is thus cursing, and lest Christians should assume too much credit in this regard, a similar abuse of prayer, all the more inexcusable because sinning against light, stands in the New Testament — «How long, O Master, the holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?»
I have also filed a complaint against Tony Jones» attorney and the family court judge (is she the attorney's former law partner and if so why didn't she recuse herself from this case?).
Against the law student's disaffection, the Civil War experience shows that careful legal interpretation can be an engine of history in its own right — a real motive and limit, not just an instrument of judges» will to power.
You came by this so - called truth arbitrarily (if you did not, please feel free to explain how you evaluated thousands of interpretations against one another and managed to discern which one was the real truth), and then YOU PRESUME TO JUDGE OTHERS based on a «truth» you arrived at arbitrarily.
They assume not only a settled ecclesiastical system in the Church, but also an established body of orthodox beliefs against which to judge heresy and, what is most significant, a collection of Christian Scriptures.
By the way by no means does this mean that I am particularly against Islam, I am also against Judaism, Christianity, and any unproven dark age manifestation of a all knowing, creator, If there was a god he sure does «nt need help enforcing his edicts and morals, remember that if there is a god then as many religions state, people will be judged upon there beliefs and sins after death and spend eternity in heaven or hell, so why is it so important for people to butt in and start trying to control each other and force people to believe in something that many think is absurd and insane.
By the word of God we define: The Easterners can not complain against the Patriarch to western Patriarchs; that every case that can not be settled in his presence must await the judgement of Christ... (and) on no grounds whatever one can think or say that the Catholicos of the East can be judged by those who are below him, or by a Patriarch equal to him he himself must be the judge of all those beneath him, and he can be judged only by Christ who has chosen him, elevated him and placed him at the head of his church.
Muslims in general if left alone with out your intervention might end up fighting each other due differences of views in their faith, but if west keep on applying pressure causing starvation, harassment and confrontation against Muslims and against their faith, this will only lead them to leave behind their differences and jointly or individually confront their enemies, those who wants to deprive them from their rights of faith and belief and the more they are pressed the more they would complain by reacting and not by words and cries since words and cries seem does not reach, heard or work out now a days since being their judges and executors are all of non religious such as atheists, infidels, polytheists who consider their vast interests above all humanity and faith issues such as mercy, leniency, compassion, pity, sympathy, kindness all that of human mutual heavenly code of conduct.!?
Let God judge all s - i - ns against God or Man.
Although the judge's decision did not deal with whether or not the sexual abuse actually happened, this latest turn of events is something of a victory for SGM, whose legal strategy has been to first argue that the First Amendment gives pastors the right to discourage victims of abuse from reporting the crimes against them to police and second to argue that the case should be thrown out on technicalities, such as the statute of limitations.
As you may have seen, last week, Reformed leaders Mark Dever, Ligon Duncan, Al Mohler, Don Carson, Kevin DeYoung, and Justin Taylor reaffirmed their support of C.J. Mahaney, president of Sovereign Grace Ministries, after a judge ruled that that nine of the eleven plaintiffs in the massive sexual abuse lawsuit against him and his ministry did not sue in time before the statue of limitations had expired.
I do not judge people but Jesus Himself said that if you are not for Him, then you are against Him.
in a position to judge another human's soul but to me the scripture tells me that I can not sin in a way that is against the Holy Spirit that fills my heart.
To this characteristic of the probable Aristotle links a trait that we have already encountered: rhetoric, he says, enables one to «persuade the opposition,» not that the orator ought to plead indifferently for or against, but if he undertakes to persuade the listeners or the judge of something, he must anticipate the argument of his adversary in order to refute it.